Skip to main content

Determining Potential Errors in Tool Chains

Strategies to Reach Tool Confidence According to ISO 26262

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 7612))

Abstract

Due to failures of software tools faults compromising the safety of the developed items may either be injected or not detected. Thus the safety norm for road vehicles, ISO 26262, requires to evaluate all software tools by identifying potential tool failures and measures to detect or avoid them. The result is a tool confidence level for each tool, which determines if and how a tool needs to be qualified. This paper focuses on tool failure identification and proposes two strategies for this task. The function-based strategy derives potential tool failures from a functional decomposition of the tool. The artifact-based strategy analyzes artifacts only. We introduce an analysis tool to support these strategies and discuss their ability to produce lists of failures that are comprehensive, uniform and adequately abstract. This discussion is based on our experience with these strategies in a large scale industrial project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. International Organization for Standardization: ISO 26262 Road Vehicles – Functional safety–, 1st edn. (November 15, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stürmer, I., Conrad, M.: Code Generator Certification: a Testsuite-Oriented Approach. In: Proceedings of Automotive-Safety & Security (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schneider, S., Slotosch, O.: A Validation Suite for Model-based Development Tools. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Quality Engineering in Software Technology, CONQUEST (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beine, M.: A Model-Based Reference Workflow for the Development of Safety-Critical Software. In: Embedded Real Time Software and Systems (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hillebrand, J., Reichenpfader, P., Mandic, I., Siegl, H., Peer, C.: Establishing Confidence in the Usage of Software Tools in Context of ISO 26262. In: Flammini, F., Bologna, S., Vittorini, V. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2011. LNCS, vol. 6894, pp. 257–269. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Laprie, J.C. (ed.): Dependability: Basic Concepts and Terminology. Springer (1992) ISBN 0-387-82296-8

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wildmoser, M., Philipps, J., Slotosch, O. (2012). Determining Potential Errors in Tool Chains. In: Ortmeier, F., Daniel, P. (eds) Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security. SAFECOMP 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7612. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33678-2_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33678-2_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33677-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33678-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics