Skip to main content

Correspondence among Subjective and Objective Similarities and Pathologic Types of Breast Masses on Digital Mammography

  • Conference paper
Breast Imaging (IWDM 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 7361))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In multi-modality, multi-information breast cancer diagnosis framework, radiologists take into account all the information available in making diagnosis, one of which can be the information from reference cases. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between pathological concordance and image similarity of breast masses for exploring the utility of similar images and determining the effective similarity index for image retrieval. Twenty-seven images of masses, three from each of 9 pathologic types, were used in this study. Subjective similarity ratings for all possible pairs (351 pairs) were provided by 8 expert readers. Thirteen image features were determined, and their usefulness as a similarity index was examined. Generally, masses with the same pathologic types were considered more similar (0.75) than those with different types (0.43) by the experts, although cysts and fibroadenomas appeared very similar on mammograms. Perimeter, ellipticity, radial gradient index, and full-width at half maximum of radial gradient histogram were considered potentially useful (correlation, r>0.4) for estimating subjective similarity among image features. Similar images together with their clinical data may serve as a useful reference for diagnosis of breast lesions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Tabar, L., Fagerberg, G., Duffy, S.W., Day, N.E., Gad, A., Grontoft, O.: Update of the Swedish two-county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer. Radiol. Clin. North Am. 30, 187–210 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shapiro, S., Venet, W., Strax, P., Venet, L., Roeser, R.: Selection, follow-up, and analysis in the health insurance plan study: A randomized trial with breast cancer screening. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr. 67, 65–74 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Humphrey, L.L., Helfand, M., Chan, B.K.S., Woolf, S.H.: Breast cancer screening: A summary of the evidence for the U.S. preventive services task force. Annals. of Internal Medecine 137, E-347-3-367 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chan, H.P., Sahiner, B., Roubidoux, M.A., Wilson, T.E., Adler, D.D., Paramagul, C., Newman, J.S., Sanjay-Gopal, S.: Improvement of radiologists‘ characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: An ROC study. Radiology 212, 817–827 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Huo, Z., Giger, M.L., Vyborny, C.J., Metz, C.E.: Breast cancer: Effectiveness of computer-aided diagnosis - observer study with independent database of mammograms. Radiology 224, 560–568 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jiang, Y., Nishikawa, R.M., Schmidt, R.A., Metz, C.E., Giger, M.L., Doi, K.: Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis. Acad. Radiol. 6, 22–33 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Swett, H.A., Fisher, P.R., Cohn, A.I., Miller, P.L., Mutalik, P.G.: Expert system-controlled image display. Radiology 172, 487–493 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Qi, H., Snyder, W.E.: Cotent-based image retrieval in picture archiving and communications systems. J. Digit. Imaging 12, 81–83 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sklansky, J., Tao, E.Y., Bazargan, M., Ornes, C.J., Murchison, R.C., Teklehaimanot, S.: Computer-aided, case-based diagnosis of mammographic regions of interest containing microcalcifications. Acad. Radiol. 7, 395–405 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Giger, M.L., Huo, Z., Vyborny, C.J., Lan, L., Bonta, I., Horsch, K., Nishikawa, R.M., Rosenbourgh, I.: Interlligent CAD workstation for breast imaging using similarity to known lesions and multiple visual prompt aids. In: Proc. SPIE Medical Imaging, vol. 4684, pp. 768–773 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Aisen, A.M., Broderick, L.S., Winer-Muram, H., Brodley, C.E., Kak, A.C., Pavlopoulou, C., Dy, J., Shyu, C.R., Marchiori, A.: Automated storage and retrieval of thin-section CT images to assist diagnosis: System description and prekliminary assessment. Radiology 228, 265–270 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li, Q., Li, F., Shiraishi, J., Katsuragawa, S., Sone, S., Doi, K.: Investigation of new psychophysical measures for evaluaation of similar images on thoracic CT for distinction between benign and malignant nodules. Med. Phys. 30, 2584–2593 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nishikawa, R.M., Yang, Y., Huo, D., Wernick, M., Sennett, C.A., Papioannou, J., Wei, L.: Observers‘ ability to judge the similarity of clustered calcifications on mammograms. In: Proc. SPIE Medical Imaging, vol. 5371, pp. 192–198 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Muramatsu, C., Li, Q., Suzuki, K., Schmidt, R.A., Shiraishi, J., Newstead, G.M., Doi, K.: Investigation of psychophysical measure for evaluation of similar images for mammographic masses: Preliminary results. Med. Phys. 32, 2295–2304 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Muramatsu, C., Li, Q., Schmidt, R.A., Shiraishi, J., Doi, K.: Investigation of psychophysical similarity measures for selection of similar images in the diagnosis of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms. Med. Phys. 35, 5695–5702 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Muramatsu, C., Li, Q., Schmidt, R.A., Shiraishi, J., Doi, K.: Determination of similarity measures for pairs of mass lesions on mammograms by use of BI-RADS lesion descriptors and image features. Acad. Radiol. 16, 443–449 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Muramatsu, C., Schmidt, R.A., Shiraishi, J., Li, Q., Doi, K.: Presentation of similar images as a reference for distinction between benign and malignant masses on mammograms: Analysis of initial observer study. J. Digit. Imaging 23, 592–602 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Muramatsu, C. et al. (2012). Correspondence among Subjective and Objective Similarities and Pathologic Types of Breast Masses on Digital Mammography. In: Maidment, A.D.A., Bakic, P.R., Gavenonis, S. (eds) Breast Imaging. IWDM 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7361. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31271-7_58

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31271-7_58

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31270-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31271-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics