Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing ((AINSC,volume 156))

  • 723 Accesses

Abstract

Nowadays, many research institutes are largely dependent on third party funding. This situation leads to practical work or in other words project work which exceeds the research typical proof of concept implementation. As we were tired of seeing a downward trend in the number of accepted application oriented (full) papers in the major agent conference, we conducted a survey to provide evidence for the thesis that researchers can gain relevant benefits from project work for their research work. Hence, in this paper, we present the results of this survey and discuss different scientific questions researchers should ask themselves during project work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balzert, H., Schäfer, C., Schröder, M., Kern, U.: Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten - Wissenschaft, Quellen, Artefakte, Organisation, Präsentation, 1st edn. W3L (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cargill, M.: Writing scientific research articles: Strategy and Steps, 1st edn. Wiley-Blackwell (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carifo, J., Perla, R.J.: Ten common misunderstandings, misconceptions, persistent myths and urban legends about likert scales and likert response formates and their antidotes. Journal of Social Sciences 3(3), 106–116 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen, W.M., Klepper, S.: Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: The case of process and product r&d. The Review of Economics and Statistics 78(2), 232–243 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Davenport, T.H.: Process Innovation: Reengineering Work through Information Technology. Harvard Business (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Elliott, J.E.: Marx and schumpeter on capitalism’s creative destruction: A comparative restatement. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 95(1), 45–68 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hirsch, B., Balke, T., Lützenberger, M.: Assessing agent applications — r&D vs. R&d. In: Weyns, D., Müller, J.P. (eds.) Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Agent-Oriented Software Engineering, vol. 1, pp. 93–104 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. IFAAMAS: Charter for the international foundation for autonomous agents and multiagent systems

    Google Scholar 

  9. Keeney, R.L.: Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking, 2nd edn. Havard University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kitchenham, B., Pfleeger, S.L.: Principles of survey research part 2: Designing a survey. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 27, 18–20 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kitchenham, B., Pfleeger, S.L.: Principles of survey research part 3: Constructing a survey instrument. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 27, 20–24 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kitchenham, B., Pfleeger, S.L.: Principles of survey research part 4: Questionnaire evaluation. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 27, 20–23 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lipowski, E.E.: Developing great research questions. American Journal of Healthsystem Pharmacy AJHP Official Journal of the American Society of HealthSystem Pharmacists 65, 1667–1670 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Luck, M., McBurney, P., Shehory, O., Willmot, S.: Agent technology: Computing as interaction – a roadmap for agent based computing (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Messing, B., Huber, K.P.: Die Doktorarbeit - Vom Start zum Ziel: Lei(d)tfaden für Promotionswillige, 4th edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pakes, A., Schankerman, M.: The rate of obsolescence of patents, research gestation lags, and the private rate of return to research resources. In: R & D, Patents, and Productivity, NBER Chapters, pp. 73–88. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pfleeger, S.L., Kitchenham, B.: Principles of survey research part 1: Turning lemons into lemonade. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 26, 16–18 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stock, S., Schneider, P., Peper, E., Molitor, E.: Erfolgreich promovieren - Ein Ratgeber von Promovierten für Promovierende, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Fähndrich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fähndrich, J., Ahrndt, S., Albayrak, S. (2012). Mining Application Development for Research. In: Pérez, J., et al. Highlights on Practical Applications of Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, vol 156. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28762-6_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28762-6_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-28761-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-28762-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics