Skip to main content

Stereopsis and Teleophthalmology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 573 Accesses

Abstract

The use of stereoscopic digital imaging in Teleophthalmology

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Diabetic Retinopathy Study. Report Number 7. A modification of the Airlie House classification of diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1981; 21(1 Pt 2):1–226

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmed J, Ward TP, Bursell SE et al (2006) The sensitivity and specificity of nonmydriatic digital stereoscopic retinal imaging in detecting diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care 29(10):2205–2209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baker CF, Rudnisky CJ, Tennant MT et al (2004) JPEG compression of stereoscopic digital images for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy via teleophthalmology. Can J Ophthalmol 39(7):746–754

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Beauregard D, Lewis J, Piccolo M et al (2000) Diagnosis of glaucoma using telemedicine – the effect of compression on the evaluation of optic nerve head cup-disc ratio. J Telemed Telecare 6(Suppl 1):S123–S125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boucher MC, Desroches G, Garcia-Salinas R et al (2008) Teleophthalmology screening for diabetic retinopathy through mobile imaging units within Canada. Can J Ophthalmol 43(6):658–668

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bursell SE, Cavallerano JD, Cavallerano AA et al (2001) Stereo nonmydriatic digital-video color retinal imaging compared with early treatment diabetic retinopathy study seven standard field 35-mm stereo color photos for determining level of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 108(3):572–585

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cavallerano JD, Aiello LP, Cavallerano AA et al (2005) Nonmydriatic digital imaging alternative for annual retinal examination in persons with previously documented no or mild diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 140(4):667–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chow SP, Aiello LM, Cavallerano JD et al (2006) Comparison of nonmydriatic digital retinal imaging versus dilated ophthalmic examination for nondiabetic eye disease in persons with diabetes. Ophthalmology 113(5):833–840

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ciulla TA, Regillo CD, Harris A (2003) Retina and optic nerve imaging. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, p x, 369p

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fransen SR, Leonard-Martin TC, Feuer WJ et al (2002) Clinical evaluation of patients with diabetic retinopathy: accuracy of the Inoveon diabetic retinopathy-3DT system. Ophthalmology 109(3):595–601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gomez-Ulla F, Alonso F, Aibar B et al (2008) A comparative cost analysis of digital fundus imaging and direct fundus examination for assessment of diabetic retinopathy. Telemed J E Health 14(9):912–918

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hanson C, Tennant MT, Rudnisky CJ (2008) Opto­metric referrals to retina specialists: evaluation and triage via teleophthalmology. Telemed J E Health 14(5):441–445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Henkes HE, Nederlands Oogheelkundig Gezelschap (1973) Photography, electro-ophthalmology and echo-ophthalmology in ophthalmic practice. In: Henkes Harold E (ed) Documenta ophthalmologica, Proceedings series. Junk, The Hague, p v, 318p

    Google Scholar 

  14. Johansen MA, Fossen K, Norum J et al (2008) The potential of digital monochrome images versus colour slides in telescreening for diabetic retinopathy. J Telemed Telecare 14(1):27–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee MS, Shin DS, Berger JW (2000) Grading, image analysis, and stereopsis of digitally compressed fundus images. Retina 20(3):275–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lehmann MV, Mardin CY, Martus P et al (2008) 3D vs 2D qualitative and semiquantitative evaluation of the glaucomatous optic disc atrophy using computer-assisted stereophotography. Eye (Lond) 22(5):628–635

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Li HK, Hubbard LD, Danis RP et al (2010) Monoscopic vs. stereoscopic retinal photography for grading diabetic retinopathy severity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51(6):3184–3192, Epub 2010 Jan 6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Martinello M, Favaro P, Muyo Nieto GD et al (2007) 3-D retinal surface inference: stereo or monocular fundus camera? Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007:896–899

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Moss SE, Meuer SM, Klein R et al (1989) Are seven standard photographic fields necessary for classification of diabetic retinopathy? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 30(5):823–828

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Murgatroyd H, Ellingford A, Cox A et al (2004) Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease. Br J Ophthalmol 88(7):920–924

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Neubauer AS, Rothschuh A, Ulbig MW et al (2008) Digital fundus image grading with the non-mydriatic visucam(PRO NM) versus the FF450(plus) camera in diabetic retinopathy. Acta Ophthalmol 86(2):177–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rudnisky CJ, Hinz BJ, Tennant MT et al (2002) High-resolution stereoscopic digital fundus photography versus contact lens biomicroscopy for the detection of clinically significant macular edema. Ophthalmology 109(2):267–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rudnisky CJ, Tennant MT, de Leon AR et al (2006) Benefits of stereopsis when identifying clinically significant macular edema via teleophthalmology. Can J Ophthalmol 41(6):727–732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rudnisky CJ, Tennant MT, Weis E et al (2007) Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 114(9):1748–1754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Saine PJ, Tyler ME (2002) Ophthalmic photography: retinal photography, angiography, and electronic imaging. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, p xv, 398p

    Google Scholar 

  26. Salti HI, Nasrallah M, Haddad S et al (2009) Enhancing nonmydriatic color photographs of the retina with monochromatic views and a stereo pair to detect diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 40(4):373–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Scanlon PH, Foy C, Malhotra R et al (2005) The influence of age, duration of diabetes, cataract, and pupil size on image quality in digital photographic retinal screening. Diabetes Care 28(10):2448–2453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Scanlon PH, Malhotra R, Greenwood RH et al (2003) Comparison of two reference standards in validating two field mydriatic digital photography as a method of screening for diabetic retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 87(10):1258–1263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Somani R, Tennant M, Rudnisky C et al (2005) Comparison of stereoscopic digital imaging and slide film photography in the identification of macular degeneration. Can J Ophthalmol 40(3):293–302

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Taylor CR, Merin LM, Salunga AM et al (2007) Improving diabetic retinopathy screening ratios using telemedicine-based digital retinal imaging technology: the Vine Hill study. Diabetes Care 30(3):574–578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tennant MT, Greve MD, Rudnisky CJ et al (2001) Identification of diabetic retinopathy by stereoscopic digital imaging via teleophthalmology: a comparison to slide film. Can J Ophthalmol 36(4):187–196

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Wade NJ (2002) Charles Wheatstone (1802–1875). Perception 31(3):265–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris J. Rudnisky M.D., MPH, FRCSC .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wong, B.K., Rudnisky, C.J., Tennant, M.T.S. (2012). Stereopsis and Teleophthalmology. In: Yogesan, K., Goldschmidt, L., Cuadros, J. (eds) Digital Teleretinal Screening. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25810-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25810-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25809-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25810-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics