Skip to main content

Does Supporting Multiple Student Strategies in Intelligent Tutoring Systems Lead to Better Learning?

  • Conference paper
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6738))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 4090 Accesses

Abstract

One feature that makes an Intelligent Tutoring System (ITS) hard to build is strategy freedom, where students are able to pursue multiple solution strategies within a given problem.. But does greater freedom mean that students learn more robustly?  We developed three versions of the same ITS for solving linear equations that differed only in the amount of freedom. We conducted a study in two US middle schools with 57 students in grades 7 and 8. Overall, students’ algebra skills improved. There was no difference in learning gain and motivation between the conditions. Students tended to adhere to a standard strategy and its minor variations, and not pursue alternative strategies. Thus, the study suggests that in early algebra learning, a small amount of freedom is useful, validating, although to a limited degree, one source of complexity in ITS architectures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. VanLehn, K.: The behavior of tutoring systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 16, 227–265 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dean Jr, D., Kuhn, D.: Direct instruction vs. Discovery: The Long View. Wiley InterScience, Hoboken (2006), http://www.interscience.wiley.com

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aleven, V., McLaren, B.M., Sewall, J., Koedinger, K.R.: A new paradigm for intelligent tutoring systems: Example-tracing tutors. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 19(2), 105–154 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Holt, Rinehart, Winston: Holt mathematics teachers edition, Course 2 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Star, J.R., Rittle-Johnson, B.: Flexibility in problem solving: The case of equation solving. Learning and instruction 18, 565–579 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Waalkens, M., Aleven, V., Taatgen, N. (2011). Does Supporting Multiple Student Strategies in Intelligent Tutoring Systems Lead to Better Learning?. In: Biswas, G., Bull, S., Kay, J., Mitrovic, A. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6738. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_105

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_105

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21868-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21869-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics