Skip to main content

Better Correspondence by Registration

  • Conference paper
Computer Vision – ACCV 2009 (ACCV 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 5996))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1641 Accesses

Abstract

Accurate image correspondence is crucial for estimating multiple-view geometry. In this paper, we present a registration-based method for improving accuracy of the image correspondences. We apply the method to fundamental matrix estimation under practical situations where there are both erroneous matches (outliers) and small feature location errors. Our registration-based method can correct feature locational error to less than 0.1 pixel, remedying localization inaccuracy due to feature detectors. Moreover, we carefully examine feature similarity based on their post-alignment appearance, providing a more reasonable prior for subsequent outlier detection. Experiments show that we can improve feature localization accuracy of the MSER feature detector, which recovers the most accurate feature localization as reported in a recent study by Haja and others. As a result of applying our method, we recover the fundamental matrix with better accuracy and more efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Torr, P., Murray, D.: The development and comparison of robust methods for estimating the fundamental matrix. International Journal of Computer Vision 24(3), 271–300 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fischler, M.A., Bolles, R.C.: Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Communications of the ACM 24(6), 381–395 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Torr, P., Zisserman, A.: MLESAC: A new robust estimator with application to estimating image geometry. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 78(1), 138–156 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tordoff, B., Murray, D.: Guided-MLESAC: Faster image transform estimation by using matching priors. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 27(10), 1523–1535 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chum, O., Matas, J.: Matching with PROSAC: Progressive sample consensus. In: Proceedings of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. I: 220–226 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Haja, A., Jahne, B., Abraham, S.: Localization accuracy of region detectors. In: Proceedings of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, June 2008, pp. 1–8 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kanatani, K., Sugaya, Y.: High accuracy fundamental matrix computation and its performance evaluation. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems E90-D(2), 579–585 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chojnacki, W., Brooks, M., van den Hengel, A., Gawley, D.: A new constrained parameter estimator for computer vision applications. Image and Vision Computing 22(2), 85–91 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Georgel, P., Benhimane, S., Navab, N.: A unified approach combining photometric and geometric information for pose estimation. In: Proceedings of British Machine Vision Conference, pp. 133–142 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rousseeuw, P.: Robust Regression and Outlier Detection. Wiley, Chichester (1987)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Obdrzalek, S., Matas, J.: Image retrieval using local compact DCT-based representation, pp. 490–497 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lowe, D.G.: Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision 60(2), 91–110 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bookstein, F.L.: Fitting conic sections to scattered data. Computer Graphics and Image Processing 9(1), 56–71 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hartley, R.I., Zisserman, A.: Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Weng, J., Huang, T., Ahuja, N.: Motion and structure from two perspective views: Algorithms, error analysis, and error estimation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 11(5), 451–476 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Luong, Q., Deriche, R., Faugeras, O., Papadopoulo, T.: On determining the fundamental matrix: Analysis of different methods and experimental results (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mikolajczyk, K., Tuytelaars, T., Schmid, C., Zisserman, A., Matas, J., Schaffalitzky, F., Kadir, T., Van Gool, L.: A comparison of affine region detectors. International Journal of Computer Vision 65(1-2), 43–72 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Matas, J., Chum, O., Urban, M., Pajdla, T.: Robust wide baseline stereo from maximally stable extremal regions. Image and Vision Computing 22(10), 761–767 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Modersitzki, J.: Numerical Methods for Image Registration. Numerical Mathematics and Scientific Computation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Conn, A.R., Gould, N.I.M., Toint, P.L.: Trust-Region Methods. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics and Mathematical Programming Society (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Riggi, F., Toews, M., Arbel, T.: Fundamental matrix estimation via TIP - transfer of invariant parameters. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Hong Kong, August 2006, pp. 21–24 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fan, S., Brooks, R., Ferrie, F.P. (2010). Better Correspondence by Registration. In: Zha, H., Taniguchi, Ri., Maybank, S. (eds) Computer Vision – ACCV 2009. ACCV 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5996. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12297-2_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12297-2_42

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12296-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12297-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics