Abstract
Without a well formulated and structured question, it can be very difficult and time consuming for physicians to identify appropriate resources and search for the best available evidence for medical treatment in evidence-based medicine (EBM). In EBM, clinical studies and questions involve four aspects: Population/Problem (P), Intervention (I), Comparison (C) and Outcome (O), which are known as PICO elements. It is intuitively more advantageous to use these elements in Information Retrieval (IR). In this paper, we first propose an approach to automatically identify the PICO elements in documents and queries. We test several possible approaches to use the identified elements in IR. Experiments show that it is a challenging task to determine accurately PICO elements. However, even with noisy tagging results, we can still take advantage of some PICO elements, namely I and P elements, to enhance the retrieval process, and this allows us to obtain significantly better retrieval effectiveness than the state-of-the-art methods.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Andrenucci, A.: Automated Question-Answering Techniques and the Medical Domain. In: HEALTHINF, pp. 207–212 (2008)
Aronson, A.R.: Effective Mapping of Biomedical Text to the UMLS Metathesaurus: The MetaMap Program. In: AMIA Symposium (2001)
Bai, J., Nie, J.Y., Paradis, F.: Using language models for text classification. In: Asia Information Retrieval Symposium (AIRS), Beijing, China (2004)
Chung, G.: Sentence retrieval for abstracts of randomized controlled trials. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 9(1), 10 (2009)
Demner-Fushman, D., Lin, J.: Answering clinical questions with knowledge-based and statistical techniques. Computational Linguistics 33(1), 63–103 (2007)
Hansen, M.J., Rasmussen, N.O., Chung, G.: A method of extracting the number of trial participants from abstracts describing randomized controlled trials. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 14(7), 354–358 (2008)
Hersh, W.R.: Information retrieval: a health and biomedical perspective. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
McKnight, L., Srinivasan, P.: Categorization of Sentence Types in Medical Abstracts. In: AMIA Symposium (2003)
Rindflesch, T.C., Fiszman, M.: The interaction of domain knowledge and linguistic structure in natural language processing: interpreting hypernymic propositions in biomedical text. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 36(6), 462–477 (2003)
Schardt, C., Adams, M., Owens, T., Keitz, S., Fontelo, P.: Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 7(1), 16 (2007)
Weinfeld, J.M., Finkelstein, K.: How to answer your clinical questions more efficiently. Family practice management 12(7), 37 (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Boudin, F., Shi, L., Nie, JY. (2010). Improving Medical Information Retrieval with PICO Element Detection. In: Gurrin, C., et al. Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5993. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12275-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12275-0_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12274-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12275-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)