Skip to main content

A Unified Approach to Modeling the Effects of Earthquakes on the Three Pillars of Geodesy

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Gravity, Geoid and Earth Observation

Part of the book series: International Association of Geodesy Symposia ((IAG SYMPOSIA,volume 135))

  • 2527 Accesses

Abstract

Besides generating seismic waves that eventually dissipate an earthquake also generates a static displacement field everywhere within the Earth, causing the geometrical shape of both the Earth’s outer surface and of internal boundaries such as the core-mantle boundary to change. By rearranging the Earth’s mass earthquakes also cause the Earth’s rotation and gravitational field to change. Earthquakes therefore affect all three pillars of geodesy, namely, the Earth’s geometrical shape, rotation, and gravity. These effects of earthquakes are usually modeled separately, with flat Earth models typically being used to compute changes in site positions and spherical Earth models being used to compute changes in the Earth’s rotation and global gravitational field. Here, a unified approach to computing changes in the three pillars of geodesy is described. As an example of this approach it is applied to the 2004 Sumatran earthquake. A preliminary comparison of predicted and SLR-observed degree-2 zonal gravitational field coefficients does not reveal the expected step-like change at the epoch of the earthquake.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aki, K. and P.G. Richards (1980). Quantitative seismology. Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, P., F. Pollitz, B. Nagarajan, and R. Bürgmann (2007). Coseismic slip distribution of the 26 December 2004 Sumatra-Andaman and 28 March 2005 Nias earthquakes from GPS static offsets. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 97(1A), S86–S102, doi:10.1785/0120050609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannelli, V., D. Melini, P. De Michelis, A. Piersanti, and F. Florindo (2007). Core-mantle boundary deformations and J 2 variations resulting from the 2004 Sumatra earthquake. Geophys. J. Int., 170, 718–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao, B.F. and R.S. Gross (1987). Changes in the Earth’s rotation and low-degree gravitational field induced by earthquakes. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 91, 569–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, M.K. and J. Ries (2007). Monthly estimates of C20 from 5 SLR satellites. GRACE Technical Note 05, p. 2, Center for Space Research, Univ. Texas, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlen, F.A. and J. Tromp (1998). Theoretical global seismology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai, S.D. (2002). Observing the pole tide with satellite altimetry. J. Geophys. Res., 107(C11), 3186, doi:10.1029/2001JC001224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dziewonski, A.M. and D.L. Anderson (1981). Preliminary reference Earth model. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter.,25,297–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, F. (1970). Excitation of the normal modes of the Earth by earthquake sources. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 22, 223–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, F. and A.M. Dziewonski (1975). An application of normal mode theory to the retrieval of structural parameters and source mechanisms from seismic spectra. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London,A278, 187–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, R.S. (2007). Earth rotation variations – long period. In: Herring, T.A. (ed), Physical geodesy, Treatise on Geophysics vol. 3, pp. 239–294, Elsevier, Oxford.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, R.S. and B.F. Chao (2006). The rotational and gravitational signature of the December 26, 2004 Sumatran earthquake. Surv. Geophs., 27, 615–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, R.S., D.A. Lavallée, G. Blewitt, and P.J. Clarke (2009). Consistency of Earth rotation, gravity, and shape measurements. In: Sideris, M.G. (ed), Observing our changing Earth, IAG Symposia vol. 133, pp. 463–472, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalnay, E., M. Kanamitsu, R. Kistler, W. Collins, D. Deaven, L. Gandin, M. Iredell, S. Saha, G. White, J. Woollen, Y. Zhu, M. Chelliah, W. Ebisuzaki, W. Higgins, J. Janowiak, K.C. Mo, C. Ropelewski, J. Wang, A. Leetmaa, R. Reynolds, R. Jenne, and D. Joseph (1996). The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull. Amer. Met. Soc., 77, 437–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaula, W.M. (1966). Theory of satellite geodesy. Blaisdell, Waltham, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapwood, E.R. and T. Usami (1981). Free oscillations of the Earth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milly, P.C.D. and A.B. Shmakin (2002). Global modeling of land water and energy balances. Part I: The Land Dynamics (LaD) model. J. Hydrometeor., 3(3), 283–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panet, I., V. Mikhailov, M. Diament, F. Pollitz, G. King, O. de Viron, M. Holschneider, R. Biancale, and J.-M. Lemoine (2007). Coseismic and post-seismic signatures of the Sumatra 2004 December and 2005 March earthquakes in GRACE satellite gravity. Geophys. J. Int., 171, 177–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabadini, R., R.E.M. Riva, and G. Dalla Via (2007). Coseismic rotation changes from the 2004 Sumatra earthquake: The effects of Earth’s compressibility versus earthquake induced topography. Geophys. J. Int., 171, 231–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stammer, D., C. Wunsch, I. Fukumori, and J. Marshall (2002). State estimation improves prospects for ocean research. Eos Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union, 83(27), 289–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, V.C., M. Nettles, G. Ekström, and A.M. Dziewonski (2005). Multiple CMT source analysis of the 2004 Sumatra earthquake. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L17304, doi:10.1029/2005GL023813.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The MINOS computer code was supplied to us by G. Masters whom we thank. The work of one of the authors (RSG) described in this paper was performed at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Support for this work was provided by the Earth Surface and Interior Focus Area of NASA’s Science Mission Directorate.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. S. Gross .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gross, R.S., Chao, B.F. (2010). A Unified Approach to Modeling the Effects of Earthquakes on the Three Pillars of Geodesy. In: Mertikas, S. (eds) Gravity, Geoid and Earth Observation. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 135. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10634-7_85

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics