Abstract
Besides generating seismic waves that eventually dissipate an earthquake also generates a static displacement field everywhere within the Earth, causing the geometrical shape of both the Earth’s outer surface and of internal boundaries such as the core-mantle boundary to change. By rearranging the Earth’s mass earthquakes also cause the Earth’s rotation and gravitational field to change. Earthquakes therefore affect all three pillars of geodesy, namely, the Earth’s geometrical shape, rotation, and gravity. These effects of earthquakes are usually modeled separately, with flat Earth models typically being used to compute changes in site positions and spherical Earth models being used to compute changes in the Earth’s rotation and global gravitational field. Here, a unified approach to computing changes in the three pillars of geodesy is described. As an example of this approach it is applied to the 2004 Sumatran earthquake. A preliminary comparison of predicted and SLR-observed degree-2 zonal gravitational field coefficients does not reveal the expected step-like change at the epoch of the earthquake.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aki, K. and P.G. Richards (1980). Quantitative seismology. Freeman, New York.
Banerjee, P., F. Pollitz, B. Nagarajan, and R. Bürgmann (2007). Coseismic slip distribution of the 26 December 2004 Sumatra-Andaman and 28 March 2005 Nias earthquakes from GPS static offsets. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 97(1A), S86–S102, doi:10.1785/0120050609.
Cannelli, V., D. Melini, P. De Michelis, A. Piersanti, and F. Florindo (2007). Core-mantle boundary deformations and J 2 variations resulting from the 2004 Sumatra earthquake. Geophys. J. Int., 170, 718–724.
Chao, B.F. and R.S. Gross (1987). Changes in the Earth’s rotation and low-degree gravitational field induced by earthquakes. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 91, 569–596.
Cheng, M.K. and J. Ries (2007). Monthly estimates of C20 from 5 SLR satellites. GRACE Technical Note 05, p. 2, Center for Space Research, Univ. Texas, Austin.
Dahlen, F.A. and J. Tromp (1998). Theoretical global seismology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Desai, S.D. (2002). Observing the pole tide with satellite altimetry. J. Geophys. Res., 107(C11), 3186, doi:10.1029/2001JC001224.
Dziewonski, A.M. and D.L. Anderson (1981). Preliminary reference Earth model. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter.,25,297–356.
Gilbert, F. (1970). Excitation of the normal modes of the Earth by earthquake sources. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 22, 223–226.
Gilbert, F. and A.M. Dziewonski (1975). An application of normal mode theory to the retrieval of structural parameters and source mechanisms from seismic spectra. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London,A278, 187–269.
Gross, R.S. (2007). Earth rotation variations – long period. In: Herring, T.A. (ed), Physical geodesy, Treatise on Geophysics vol. 3, pp. 239–294, Elsevier, Oxford.
Gross, R.S. and B.F. Chao (2006). The rotational and gravitational signature of the December 26, 2004 Sumatran earthquake. Surv. Geophs., 27, 615–632.
Gross, R.S., D.A. Lavallée, G. Blewitt, and P.J. Clarke (2009). Consistency of Earth rotation, gravity, and shape measurements. In: Sideris, M.G. (ed), Observing our changing Earth, IAG Symposia vol. 133, pp. 463–472, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Kalnay, E., M. Kanamitsu, R. Kistler, W. Collins, D. Deaven, L. Gandin, M. Iredell, S. Saha, G. White, J. Woollen, Y. Zhu, M. Chelliah, W. Ebisuzaki, W. Higgins, J. Janowiak, K.C. Mo, C. Ropelewski, J. Wang, A. Leetmaa, R. Reynolds, R. Jenne, and D. Joseph (1996). The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull. Amer. Met. Soc., 77, 437–471.
Kaula, W.M. (1966). Theory of satellite geodesy. Blaisdell, Waltham, Mass.
Lapwood, E.R. and T. Usami (1981). Free oscillations of the Earth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Milly, P.C.D. and A.B. Shmakin (2002). Global modeling of land water and energy balances. Part I: The Land Dynamics (LaD) model. J. Hydrometeor., 3(3), 283–299.
Panet, I., V. Mikhailov, M. Diament, F. Pollitz, G. King, O. de Viron, M. Holschneider, R. Biancale, and J.-M. Lemoine (2007). Coseismic and post-seismic signatures of the Sumatra 2004 December and 2005 March earthquakes in GRACE satellite gravity. Geophys. J. Int., 171, 177–190.
Sabadini, R., R.E.M. Riva, and G. Dalla Via (2007). Coseismic rotation changes from the 2004 Sumatra earthquake: The effects of Earth’s compressibility versus earthquake induced topography. Geophys. J. Int., 171, 231–243.
Stammer, D., C. Wunsch, I. Fukumori, and J. Marshall (2002). State estimation improves prospects for ocean research. Eos Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union, 83(27), 289–295.
Tsai, V.C., M. Nettles, G. Ekström, and A.M. Dziewonski (2005). Multiple CMT source analysis of the 2004 Sumatra earthquake. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L17304, doi:10.1029/2005GL023813.
Acknowledgements
The MINOS computer code was supplied to us by G. Masters whom we thank. The work of one of the authors (RSG) described in this paper was performed at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Support for this work was provided by the Earth Surface and Interior Focus Area of NASA’s Science Mission Directorate.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gross, R.S., Chao, B.F. (2010). A Unified Approach to Modeling the Effects of Earthquakes on the Three Pillars of Geodesy. In: Mertikas, S. (eds) Gravity, Geoid and Earth Observation. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 135. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10634-7_85
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10634-7_85
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-10633-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-10634-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)