Skip to main content

A Semantics-Preserving Approach for Extracting OWL Ontologies from UML Class Diagrams

  • Conference paper
Book cover Database Theory and Application (DTA 2009)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 64))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Full implementation of the Semantic Web requires widespread availability of OWL ontologies. Manual ontology development using current OWL-aware editors remains a tedious and cumbersome task that can easily result in a knowledge acquisition bottleneck. Conceptual schemata such as UML class diagrams, on the other hand, capture abundant domain knowledge. Thus developing approaches and tools for extracting the available knowledge can facilitate the development of OWL ontologies and the construction of various Semantic Web applications. In this paper, a formal approach for extracting OWL DL ontologies from existing UML class diagrams is presented. The approach establishes a precise conceptual correspondence between the two models and relies on a semantics-preserving UML-to-OWL translation algorithm. Tool implementation and case study show that the proposed approach is effective and fully automatic ontology extraction from UML Class Diagrams is implementable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web. Scientific American 284(5), 34–43 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jacob, E.K.: Ontologies and the Semantic Web. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 29(4), 19–22 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dean, M., Schreiber, G. (eds.): OWL Web Ontology Language Reference. W3C Recommendation (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/

  4. Maedche, A., Staab, S.: Ontology learning for the Semantic Web. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16(2), 72–79 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Object Management Group: Unified Modeling Language: Superstructure, Version 2.0 (2005), http://www.omg.org/docs/formal/05-07-04.pdf

  6. Volz, R., Handschuh, S., Staab, S., et al.: Unveiling the hidden bride: deep annotation for mapping and migrating legacy data to the Semantic Web. Journal of Web Semantics 1(2), 187–206 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stollberg, M., Lausen, H., Lara, R., et al.: Towards Semantic Web portals. In: Proc. of the WWW 2004 Workshop on Application Design, Development and Implementation Issues in the Semantic Web, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 105 (2004), http://CEUR-WS.org/Vol-105/

  8. He, B., Patel, M., Zhang, Z., Chang, K.C.-C.: Accessing the Deep Web. Communications of the ACM 50(5), 94–101 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sahoo, S.S., Halb, W., Hellmann, S., et al.: A Survey of Current Approaches for Mapping of Relational Databases to RDF. In: W3C RDB2RDF Incubator Group report (2009), http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/urw3/XGR-RDB2RDF-20090108/

  10. Cranefield, S.: UML and the Semantic Web. In: Proc. of the first Semantic Web Working Symposium, pp. 113–130. Stanford University, California (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Baclawski, K., Kokar, M.K., Kogut, P.A., et al.: Extending UML to support ontology engineering for the Semantic Web. In: Gogolla, M., Kobryn, C. (eds.) UML 2001. LNCS, vol. 2185, pp. 342–360. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Djuric, D., Gasevic, D., Devedzic, V.: Ontology modeling and MDA. Journal of Object Technology 4(1), 109–128 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gasevic, D., Djuric, D., Devedzic, V.: MDA-based Automatic OWL Ontology Development. International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer 9(2), 103–117 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Falkovych, K., Sabou, M., Stuckenschmidt, H.: UML for the Semantic Web: transformation-based approaches. In: Knowledge Transformation for the Semantic Web, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 95, pp. 92–106. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Na, H.-S., Choi, O.-H., Lim, J.-E.: A method for building domain ontologies based on the transformation of UML models. In: Proc. of 4th Int’l Conf. on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications, pp. 332–338. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Berardi, D., Calvanese, D., Giacomo, G.D.: Reasoning on UML class diagrams. Artificial Intelligence 168(1-2), 70–118 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Calvanese, D., Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D.: Unifying class-based representation formalisms. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 11, 199–240 (1999)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Patel-Schneider, P.F., Hayes, P., Horrocks, I. (eds.): OWL Web Ontology Language Semantics and Abstract Syntax. W3C Recommendation (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-absyn/

  19. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., van Harmelen, F.: From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: the making of a Web ontology language. Journal of Web Semantics 1(1), 7–26 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Xu, Z., Ni, Y., Lin, L., Gu, H. (2009). A Semantics-Preserving Approach for Extracting OWL Ontologies from UML Class Diagrams. In: Ślęzak, D., Kim, Th., Zhang, Y., Ma, J., Chung, Ki. (eds) Database Theory and Application. DTA 2009. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 64. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10583-8_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10583-8_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-10582-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-10583-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics