Skip to main content

Dynamic Source Routing versus Greedy Routing in a Testbed Sensor Network Deployment

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCCN,volume 5432))

Abstract

We present our findings of an empirical performance comparison between dynamic source routing and greedy routing in a testbed wireless sensor network deployment. The environment is based on a grid ranging between 2 ×2 to 7 ×7 battery operated Tmote Sky sensor nodes. We briefly sketch the protocol implementations and the experimental setup used in this work. We also discuss how we managed such larger set of nodes in a convenient way. We hope that some of the lessons we learnt may be useful to others doing such kind of testbed experiments as well. Finally, we discuss our findings from the measurement data we have gathered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Royer, E.M., Toh, C.K.: A review of current routing protocols for ad hoc mobile wireless networks. IEEE Personal Communications 6(2), 46–55 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Frey, H., Stojmenovic, I.: Geographic and energy aware routing in sensor networks. In: Stojmenovic, I. (ed.) Handobook on Sensor Networks. Wiley, Chichester (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gay, D., Levis, P., von Behren, R., Welsh, M., Brewer, E., Culler, D.: The nesc language: A holistic approach to networked embedded systems. In: ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hill, J., Szewczyk, R., Woo, A., Hollar, S., Culler, D.E., Pister, K.S.J.: System architecture directions for networked sensors. In: Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, pp. 93–104 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buonadonna, P., Hill, J., Culler, D.: Active message communication for tiny networked sensors. In: Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM 2001) (April 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson, D.B., Maltz, D.A.: Dynamic source routing in ad hoc wireless networks. In: Mobile Computing. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Takagi, H., Kleinrock, L.: Optimal transmission ranges for randomly distributed packet radio terminals. IEEE Transactions on Communications 32(3), 246–257 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Finn, G.G.: Routing and addressing problems in large metropolitan-scale internetworks. Technical Report ISI/RR-87-180, Information Sciences Institute (ISI) (March 1987)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kuruvila, J., Nayak, A., Stojmenovic, I.: Greedy localized routing for maximizing probability of delivery in wireless ad hoc networks with a realistic physical layer. In: CD Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on AlgorithmS for Wireless And mobile Networks (A-SWAN), Personal, Sensor, Ad-hoc, and Cellular Workshop (at MobiQuitous), Boston, Massachusetts (August 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Heissenbüttel, M., Braun, T.: BLR: Beacon-less routing algorithm for mobile ad-hoc networks. Elsevier’s Computer Communications Journal (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Blum, B.M., He, T., Son, S., Stankovic, J.A.: IGF: A state-free robust communication protocol for wireless sensor networks. Technical Report CS-2003-11, Department of Computer Science, University of Virginia, April 21 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Füßler, H., Widmer, J., Käsemann, M., Mauve, M., Hartenstein, H.: Contention-based forwarding for mobile ad-hoc networks. Ad Hoc Networks 1(4), 351–369 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang, X., Dutta, P., Culler, D., Stoica, I.: Micro power meter for energy monitoring of wireless sensor networks at scale. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN 2007), April 25–27, 2007, pp. 186–195 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Köpke, A., Wolisz, A.: Measuring the node energy consumption in usb based WSN testbeds. In: Workshop Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS 2008), June 17–20, 2008, pp. 333–338 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Frey, H., Pind, K. (2009). Dynamic Source Routing versus Greedy Routing in a Testbed Sensor Network Deployment. In: Roedig, U., Sreenan, C.J. (eds) Wireless Sensor Networks. EWSN 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5432. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00224-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00224-3_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00223-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00224-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics