Skip to main content

Pretreatment of Ceftriaxone Formulation Effluents: Drawbacks and Benefits

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Survival and Sustainability

Part of the book series: Environmental Earth Sciences ((EESCI))

  • 122 Accesses

Abstract

As a result of its high inert COD content (approximately 250 mg/l accounting for 63% of the total COD) and the possibility to evoke antibiotic resistance, Ceftriaxone sodium antibiotic formulation effluent (molecular formula = C18H16N8Na2O7S3) requires an additional treatment process preferably as chemical pretreatment along with the biological one to meet the discharge standards. The present study dealt with the effect of applying ozonation and the H2O2/O3 process (perozonation) as a partial pretreatment stage to the mentioned antibiotic formulation effluent. 20 min of ozonation at a rate of 1500 mg/(l·h) removed 48% COD, whereas a COD removal efficiency of 53% could be achieved via perozonation in the presence of 31 mM H2O2. Ozonation completely eliminated the inhibitory effect of the effluent towards activated sludge, however at the same time it also resulted in an increase in acute toxicity towards the marine microalgae Phaeodactylum tricornutum. On the other hand, by perozonation a considerable reduction in the inhibitory effect of the studied effluent towards heterotrophic biomass was achieved, unfortunately perozonation also increased the toxicity of the effluent towards the marine microalgae.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alexy R, Kümpel T, Kümmerer K (2004) Assessment of degradation of 18 antibiotics in the closed bottle test. Chemosphere 57:505–512

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. APHA-AWWWA-WPCF (1989) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 17th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arslan-Alaton I, Doğruel S, Baykal E, Gerone G (2004) Combined chemical and biological oxidation of penicillin formualtion effluent. J Environ Manage 73:155–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arslan-Alaton I, Çağlayan AE (2006) Toxicity and biodegradability of raw and ozonated procaine penicillin G formulation effluent. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety 63:131–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Balcıoğlu AI, Ötker M (2003) Treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater containing antibiotics by O3 and O3/H2O2 processes. Chemosphere 50(1):85–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Çokgör EU, Karahan Ö, Arslan-Alaton I, Saruhan H, Orhon D (2005) Biological treatability of raw and ozonated synthetic penicillin formulation effluent. Water Sci Technol 52(10–11):89–96

    Google Scholar 

  7. Germirli F, Orhon D, Artan N, Ubay E, Görgün E (1993) Effect of two-stage treatment on the biological treatability of strong industrial wastewaters. Water Sci Technol 28(2):145–152

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gilbert E (1987) Biodegradability of ozonated products as a function of COD and TOC elimination by example substituted aromatic substances. Water Res 21:1273–1278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gottschalk C, Libra JA, Saupe A (2000) Application of ozone in combined processes, Chapter 6. In: Ozonation of water and wastewater. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, Weinheim, Germany, pp 162–166

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guillard RRL (1972) Culture of phytoplankton for feeding marine invertebrates. In: Smith WL, Chanley MH (eds) Culture of marine invertebrate animals. Plenum Press, New York, pp 29–60

    Google Scholar 

  11. ISO (1986a) Water quality – Determination of the chemical oxygen demand. Ref. No. ISO 6060-1986

    Google Scholar 

  12. ISO (1986b) Water quality – Oxygen demand inhibition assay in activated sludge. Ref. No. ISO 8192-1986

    Google Scholar 

  13. Iwane T, Urase T, Yamamoto K (2001) Possible impact of treated wastewater discharge on incidence of antibiotic resistant bacteria in river water. Water Sci Technol 43(2):91–99

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kümmerer K, Al-Ahmad A, Mersch-Sundermann V (2000) Biodegradability of some antibiotics, elimination of the genotoxicity and affection of wastewater bacteria in a simple test. Chemosphere 40:701–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lateef A (2004) The microbiology of a pharmaceutical effluent and its public health implications. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 20:167–171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Miller WE, Gree JC, Shiroyama T (1978) Experimental design, application and data interpretation protocol. Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, US EPA-600/9-78-018, 97330, Oregon

    Google Scholar 

  17. Okay OS, Tüfekçi V, Donkin P (2002) Acute and chronic toxicity of pyrene to the unicellular marine alga Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 68:600–605

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sanderson H, Johnson DJ, Wilson CJ, Brain RA, Solomon KR (2003) Probabilistic hazard assessment of environmentally occurring pharmaceuticals toxicity to fish, daphnids and algae by ECOSAR screening. Toxicol Lett 144:383–395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted as part of research activities of The Environmental Biotechnology Centre of The Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Germirli Babuna .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tezgel, T., Babuna, F.G., Arslan-Alaton, I., Iskender, G., Okay, O. (2010). Pretreatment of Ceftriaxone Formulation Effluents: Drawbacks and Benefits. In: Gökçekus, H., Türker, U., LaMoreaux, J. (eds) Survival and Sustainability. Environmental Earth Sciences. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-95991-5_89

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics