Skip to main content

Checking and Enforcement of Modeling Guidelines with Graph Transformations

  • Conference paper
Applications of Graph Transformations with Industrial Relevance (AGTIVE 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 5088))

Abstract

In the automotive industry, the model driven development of software for embedded controller units evolves to become the standard paradigm. In this domain, the development is based on executable block diagrams and StateCharts which are provided by the commonly used tool MATLAB Simulink/Stateflow. Huge catalogues with hundreds of modeling guidelines have already been developed to increase the quality of models and ensure the safety and reliability of the generated code. Checking these guidelines and eliminating detected violations manually during audits is a tremendous amount of boring work. In this paper, we show how graph transformations can be used to automate the process of guideline checking and the execution of repair actions. Based on our experiences in an industrial context, we discuss the pros and cons of graph transformations compared to other specification approaches and we finally present a proposal how to combine graph transformations with other modeling paradigms as the most promising approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Farkas, T., Röbig, H.: Automatisierte, werkzeugübergreifende Richtlinienprüfung zur Unterstützung des Automotive-Entwicklungsprozesses. In: Rumpe, B., Conrad, M., Giese, H., Schätz, B. (eds.) Dagstuhl-Workshop MBEES: Modellbasierte Entwicklung eingebetteter Systeme III, Informatik Bericht TU Braunschweig, vol. 2007-01. Institut für Software Systems Engineering, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany (2007) (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fujaba Homepage, http://www.fujaba.de

  3. Jakob, J., Königs, A., Schürr, A.: Non-materialized Model View Specification with Triple Graph Grammars. In: Corradini, A., Ehrig, H., Montanari, U., Ribeiro, L., Rozenberg, G. (eds.) ICGT 2006. LNCS, vol. 4178, pp. 321–335. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. MAAB Homepage, http://www.mathworks.com/industries/auto/maab.html

  5. MATLAB Homepage, http://www.mathworks.com/products/

  6. Mint Homepage, http://www.ricardo.com/engineeringservices/controlelectronics.aspx?page=mint

  7. MOFLON Homepage, http://www.moflon.org

  8. Mens, T., Van Der Straeten, R., D’Hondt, M.: Detecting and resolving model inconsistencies using transformation dependency analysis. In: Nierstrasz, O., Whittle, J., Harel, D., Reggio, G. (eds.) MoDELS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4199, pp. 200–214. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Neema, S., Kalmar, Z., Shi, F., Vizhanyo, A., Karsai, G.: A visually-specified code generator for simulink/stateflow. In: VLHCC 2005: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC 2005), Washington, DC, USA, pp. 275–277. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stürmer, I., Conrad, M., Fey, I., Dörr, H.: Experiences with Model and Autocode Reviews in Model-based Software Development. In: Salzmann, C., Rappl, M., Pretschner, A., Stauner, T. (eds.) Proc. of 3rd Intl. ICSE Workshop on Software Engineering for Automotive Systems (SEAS 2006). ACM Press, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stürmer, I., Dörr, H., Giese, H., Kelter, U., Schürr, A., Zündorf, A.: Das MATE Projekt-visuelle Spezifikation von MATLAB Simulink/Stateflow Analysen und Transformationen. In: Rumpe, B., Conrad, M., Giese, H., Schätz, B. (eds.) Dagstuhl-Workshop MBEES: Modellbasierte Entwicklung eingebetteter Systeme III, number, 2007-01 in Informatik Bericht TU Braunschweig, Institut für Software Systems Engineering, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany (2007) (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sohn, M.: Korrektheitsbegriffe für modellbasierte Codegeneratoren. Master’s thesis, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg (June 2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Amelunxen, C., Legros, E., Schürr, A., Stürmer, I. (2008). Checking and Enforcement of Modeling Guidelines with Graph Transformations. In: Schürr, A., Nagl, M., Zündorf, A. (eds) Applications of Graph Transformations with Industrial Relevance. AGTIVE 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5088. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89020-1_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89020-1_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-89019-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-89020-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics