Skip to main content

One-Pass Tableaux for Computation Tree Logic

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4790))

Abstract

We give the first single-pass (“on the fly”) tableau decision procedure for computational tree logic (CTL). Our method extends Schwendimann’s single-pass decision procedure for propositional linear temporal logic (PLTL) but the extension is non-trivial because of the interactions between the branching inherent in CTL-models, which is missing in PLTL-models, and the “or” branching inherent in tableau search. Our method extends to many other fix-point logics like propositional dynamic logic (PDL) and the logic of common knowledge (LCK).

The decision problem for CTL is known to be EXPTIME-complete, but our procedure requires 2EXPTIME in the worst case. A similar phenomenon occurs in extremely efficient practical single-pass tableau algorithms for very expressive description logics with EXPTIME-complete decision problems because the 2EXPTIME worst-case behaviour rarely arises. Our method is amenable to the numerous optimisation methods invented for these description logics and has been implemented in the Tableau Work Bench ( twb.rsise.anu.edu.au ) without these extensive optimisations. Its one-pass nature also makes it amenable to parallel proof-search on multiple processors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abate, P.: The Tableau Workbench: a framework for building automated tableau-based theorem provers. PhD thesis, The Australian National University (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baader, F., Tobies, S.: The inverse method implements the automata approach for modal satisfiability. In: Goré, R.P., Leitsch, A., Nipkow, T. (eds.) IJCAR 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2083, pp. 92–106. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baader, F.: Augmenting concept languages by transitive closure of roles: an alternative to terminological cycles. Technical Report, DFKI (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Basukoski, A., Bolotov, A.: A clausal resolution method for branching time logic ECTL+. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 46(3), 235–263 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Ben-Ari, M., Manna, Z., Pnueli, A.: The temporal logic of branching time. In: Proceedings of Principles of Programming Languages (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Emerson, E.A., Halpern, J.Y.: Decision procedures and expressiveness in the temporal logic of branching time. J. of Computer and System Sci. 30, 1–24 (1985)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Fisher, M., Dixon, C., Peim, M.: Clausal temporal resolution. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gaintzarain, J., Hermo, M., Lucio, P., Navarro, M., Orejas, F.: A Cut-Free and Invariant-Free Sequent Calculus for PLTL. In: 6th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science and Logic (to appear, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gough, G.: Decision procedures for temporal logics. Master’s thesis, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Manchester, England (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grumberg, O., Clarke, E.M., Peled, D.A.: Model checking. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F.: Optimising description logic subsumption. Journal of Logic and Computation 9(3), 267–293 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Horrocks, I., Sattler, U.: A tableaux decision procedure for SHOIQ. In: Proc. of the 19th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 448–453 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hustadt, U., Konev, B.: TRP++: A temporal resolution prover. In: Collegium Logicum, Kurt Gödel Society, pp. 65–79 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jäger, G., Alberucci, L.: About cut elimination for logics of common knowledge. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 133(1-3), 73–99 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Jäger, G., Kretz, M., Studer, T.: Cut-free common knowledge. Journal of Applied Logic (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Janssen, G.: Logics for Digital Circuit Verification: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications. PhD thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kesten, Y., Manna, Z., McGuire, H., Pnueli, A.: A decision algorithm for full propositional temporal logic. In: Courcoubetis, C. (ed.) CAV 1993. LNCS, vol. 697, pp. 97–109. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Manna, Z., Pnueli, A.: The Temporal Logic of Reactive and Concurrent Systems: Specification. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Reynolds, M.: Towards a CTL* tableau. In: Ramanujam, R., Sen, S. (eds.) FSTTCS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3821, pp. 384–395. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Schwendimann, S.: A new one-pass tableau calculus for PLTL. In: de Swart, H. (ed.) TABLEAUX 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1397, pp. 277–291. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Vardi, M.Y., Pan, G., Sattler, U.: BDD-based decision procedures for K. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 16(1-2), 169–208 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Vardi, M.Y., Wolper, P.: Automata-theoretic techniques for modal logics of programs. Journal of Computer Systems and Science (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Voronkov, A.: How to optimize proof-search in modal logics: new methods of proving redundancy criteria for sequent calculi. ACM Trans. on Comp. Logic 2(2) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wolper, P.: Temporal logic can be more expressive. Inf. and Cont. 56, 72–99 (1983)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Nachum Dershowitz Andrei Voronkov

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Abate, P., Goré, R., Widmann, F. (2007). One-Pass Tableaux for Computation Tree Logic. In: Dershowitz, N., Voronkov, A. (eds) Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning. LPAR 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4790. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75560-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75560-9_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75558-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75560-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics