Skip to main content

Using Answer Sets to Solve Belief Change Problems

  • Conference paper
Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (LPNMR 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4483))

  • 538 Accesses

Abstract

We describe BE, an implemented system for solving belief change problems in the presence of actions. We illustrate how we can use BE to compute the result of belief progression, belief revision, and belief evolution in a transition system framework. The basic idea is to identify belief change problems with path-finding problems in a transition system. First, BE translates belief change problems into logic programs with answer sets corresponding to an agent’s evolving beliefs. Second, it uses existing smodels libraries to find the answer sets for the given logic programs. Conflicting observations are handled in a separate pre-processing phase, which is also based on finding answer sets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Action languages. Linköping Electronic Articles in Computer and Information Science 3(16), 1–16 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lang, J.: About time, revision, and update. In: Proceedings of NMR 2006 (June 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alchourrón, C., Gärdenfors, P., Makinson, D.: On the logic of theory change: Partial meet functions for contraction and revision. Journal of Symbolic Logic 50(2), 510–530 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Hunter, A., Delgrande, J.: An action description language for iterated belief change. In: Proceedings of IJCAI07 (January 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hunter, A., Delgrande, J.: Iterated belief change: A transition system approach. In: Proceedings of IJCAI05 (August 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Moore, R.: A formal theory of knowledge and action. In: Hobbs, J., Moore, R. (eds.) Formal Theories of the Commonsense World, pp. 319–358. Ablex Publishing, Greenwich (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Niemelä, I., Simons, P.: smodels - an implementation of stable model and well-founded semantics for normal logic programs. In: Fuhrbach, U., Dix, J., Nerode, A. (eds.) LPNMR 1997. LNCS, vol. 1265, pp. 141–151. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lifschitz, V., Turner, H.: Representing transition systems by logic programs. In: Gelfond, M., Leone, N., Pfeifer, G. (eds.) LPNMR 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1730, pp. 92–106. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Chitta Baral Gerhard Brewka John Schlipf

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hunter, A., Delgrande, J.P., Faber, J. (2007). Using Answer Sets to Solve Belief Change Problems. In: Baral, C., Brewka, G., Schlipf, J. (eds) Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning. LPNMR 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4483. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72200-7_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72200-7_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-72199-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-72200-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics