Skip to main content

Robust Test Generation and Coverage for Hybrid Systems

  • Conference paper
Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control (HSCC 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4416))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Testing is an important tool for validation of the system design and its implementation. Model-based test generation allows to systematically ascertain whether the system meets its design requirements, particularly the safety and correctness requirements of the system. In this paper, we develop a framework for generating tests from hybrid systems’ models. The core idea of the framework is to develop a notion of robust test, where one nominal test can be guaranteed to yield the same qualitative behavior with any other test that is close to it. Our approach offers three distinct advantages. 1) It allows for computing and formally quantifying the robustness of some properties, 2) it establishes a method to quantify the test coverage for every test case, and 3) the procedure is parallelizable and therefore, very scalable. We demonstrate our framework by generating tests for a navigation benchmark application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dang, T., Maler, O.: Reachability analysis via face lifting. In: Henzinger, T.A., Sastry, S.S. (eds.) HSCC 1998. LNCS, vol. 1386, pp. 96–109. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kurzhanski, A.B., Varaiya, P.: Ellipsoidal technique for reachability analysis. In: Lynch, N.A., Krogh, B.H. (eds.) HSCC 2000. LNCS, vol. 1790, pp. 202–214. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Mitchell, I., Tomlin, C.J.: Level set methods in for computation in hybrid systems. In: Lynch, N.A., Krogh, B.H. (eds.) HSCC 2000. LNCS, vol. 1790, pp. 310–323. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Alur, R., Dang, T., Ivancic, F.: Reachability analysis of hybrid systems via predicate abstraction. In: Tomlin, C.J., Greenstreet, M.R. (eds.) HSCC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2289, pp. 35–48. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Han, Z., Krogh, B.H.: Reachability analysis of hybrid control systems using reduced-order. In: Proc. American Control Conference, pp. 1183–1189 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Prajna, S., Jadbabaie, A.: Safety verification of hybrid systems using barrier certificates. In: Alur, R., Pappas, G.J. (eds.) HSCC 2004. LNCS, vol. 2993, pp. 477–492. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Frehse, G.: PHAVer: Algorithmic verification of hybrid systems past HyTech. In: Morari, M., Thiele, L. (eds.) HSCC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3414, pp. 258–273. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Girard, A.: Reachability of uncertain linear systems using zonotopes. In: Morari, M., Thiele, L. (eds.) HSCC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3414, pp. 291–305. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fehnker, A., Ivancic, F.: Benchmarks for hybrid systems verification. In: Alur, R., Pappas, G.J. (eds.) HSCC 2004. LNCS, vol. 2993, pp. 326–341. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Esposito, J.M.: Randomized test case generation for hybrid systems: metric selection. In: Proc. 36th Southeastern Symposium of System Theory (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Branicky, M.S., et al.: RRTs for nonlinear, discrete, and hybrid planning and control. In: Proc. IEEE Conf. Decision and Control, Hawaii, USA, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. van Osch, M.: Automated model-based testing of χ simulation models with TorX. In: Reussner, R., et al. (eds.) QoSA 2005 and SOQUA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3712, pp. 227–241. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Esposito, J.M.: Automated test trajectory for hybrid systems. In: Proc. 35th Southeastern Symposium of System Theory (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tan, L., Kim, J., Lee, I.: Testing and monitoring model-based generated program. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 89(2) (2003), http://www.elsevier.nl/locate/lntcs/volume89.html

  15. Hong, H.S., et al.: A temporal logic based theory of test coverage and generation. In: Katoen, J.-P., Stevens, P. (eds.) ETAPS 2002 and TACAS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2280, pp. 327–341. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Alur, R., et al.: The algorithmic analysis of hybrid systems. Theoretical Computer Science 138, 3–34 (1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Girard, A., Pappas, G.J.: Approximation metrics for discrete and continuous systems. Accepted for publication on IEEE Trans. Automatic Control (March 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lohmiller, W., Slotine, J.J.E.: On contraction analysis for nonlinear systems. Automatica 34(6), 683–696 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Aylward, E., Parillo, P.A., Slotine, J.J.E.: Algorithmic search for contraction metrics via sos programming. In: Proc. American Control Conference, Minneapolis, USA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Brogan, W.L.: Modern control theory. Prentice Hall International, New Jersey (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. LaValle, S.M.: Planning algorithms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Makhlouf, I.B., Kowalewski, S.: An evaluation of two recent reachability analysis tools for hybrid systems. In: Proc. IFAC Conf. Analysis and Design of Hybrid Systems, Alghero, Italy, pp. 377–382. IFAC (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fainekos, G.E., Girard, A., Pappas, G.J.: Temporal logic verification using simulation. In: Asarin, E., Bouyer, P. (eds.) FORMATS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4202, pp. 171–186. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Julius, A.A.: Approximate abstraction of stochastic hybrid automata. In: Hespanha, J.P., Tiwari, A. (eds.) HSCC 2006. LNCS, vol. 3927, pp. 318–332. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. D’Innocenzo, A., Di Benedetto, M.D., Di Gennaro, S.: Observability of hybrid automata by abstraction. In: Hespanha, J.P., Tiwari, A. (eds.) HSCC 2006. LNCS, vol. 3927, pp. 169–183. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Alberto Bemporad Antonio Bicchi Giorgio Buttazzo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Julius, A.A., Fainekos, G.E., Anand, M., Lee, I., Pappas, G.J. (2007). Robust Test Generation and Coverage for Hybrid Systems. In: Bemporad, A., Bicchi, A., Buttazzo, G. (eds) Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control. HSCC 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4416. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71493-4_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71493-4_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-71492-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-71493-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics