Skip to main content

Transport Network Vulnerability: a Method for Diagnosis of Critical Locations in Transport Infrastructure Systems

  • Chapter
Critical Infrastructure

Part of the book series: Advances in Spatial Science ((ADVSPATIAL))

Abstract

Considerations of critical infrastructure are now a major concern in Australia as in many other countries. The concern stems from a variety of causes, including the state of development, condition and level of use of existing infrastructure systems, especially transport networks; difficulties associated with public sector provision of new infrastructure; publicprivate partnership arrangements for infrastructure provision; and perceptions of risks and threats to infrastructure from both natural disasters (e.g. floods, fire or earthquake) and from human malevolence such as acts of sabotage, war or terrorism. The Australian Federal Government has defined critical infrastructure as ‘that infrastructure which if destroyed, degraded or rendered unavailable for an extended period, will significantly impact on social or economic well-being or affect national security or defence’ (Attorney-General’s Department, 2003). A pertinent question is then how to identify critical locations in an infrastructure network. For example, the road transport network is large, wide and diverse in nature. Are there particular locations or facilities in that network where loss or degradation of certain road sections (links) will have significant impacts? How should such impacts be assessed?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Asakura, Y. 1999. Evaluation of network reliability using stochastic user equilibrium. Journal of Advanced Transportation 33(2), pp.147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attorney-General’s Department. 2003. Trusted information sharing network for critical infrastructure protection. Attorney-General’s Department, Australian Government. Canberra ACT, 10 March 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M.G.H. and C. Cassir (eds.). 2000. Reliability of Transport Networks. Baldock, Herts: Research Studies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M.G.H. and Y. Iida. 1997. Transportation Network Analysis. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdica, K. 2002. An introduction to road vulnerability: what has been done, is done and should be done. Transport Policy 9, 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonsall, P.W. 2000. Travellers’ response to uncertainty. In Reliability of Transport Networks. Edited by M.G.H. Bell and C. Cassir. Baldock, Herts: Research Studies Press, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • BTRE. 2002. Benefits of flood mitigation in Australia. Report 106, Bureau of Transport and Regional Economics, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, A., Yang, H., Lo, H.K. and Tang, W.H. 1999. A capacity related reliability for transportation networks. Journal of Advanced Transportation 33(2), 183–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Este, G.M. and Taylor, M.A.P. 2001. Modelling network vulnerability at the level of the national strategic transport network. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 4(2), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Este, G.M. and Taylor, M.A.P. 2003. Network vulnerability: an approach to reliability analysis at the level of national strategic transport networks. In The Network Reliability of Transport. Edited by Y. Iida and M.G.H. Bell. Oxford: Pergamon-Elsevier, 23–44.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • DHAC. 2001. Measuring remoteness: accessibility/remoteness index of Australia (ARIA) (Revised edition). Occasional Paper, New Series no 14. Commonwealth Department of Health and the Ageing, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, A.W. 1994. Evaluating public transport and road safety measures. Accident Analysis and Prevention 26, 411–428.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gargett, D. and Sidebottom, A. 2003. Freight between Australian cities 1972 to 2001. Information sheet 22, Bureau of Transport and Regional Economics, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, W.G. 1959. How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 25, 73–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iida, Y. 1999. Basic concepts and future directions of road network reliability analysis. Journal of Advanced Transportation 33(2), 125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iida, Y. and Bell, M.G.H. (eds.). 2003. The Network Reliability of Transport. Oxford: Pergamon-Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, J.G. 1980. Indicators of urban accessibility: theory and application. Transportation 9, 145–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, W.H.K. (ed). 1999. Special issue on transport network reliability. Journal of Advanced Transportation 33(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, W.H.K. and Xu, G. 2000. Calibration of traffic flow simulator for network reliability assessment. In Reliability of Transport Networks. Edited by M.G.H. Bell and C. Cassir. Baldock, Herts: Research Studies Press, 139–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C.E. 1946. New works for wartime traffic. The Railway Magazine 92, May/June, 177–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J.M., Dumble, P.L. and Wigan, M.R. 1979. Accessibility indicators for transport planning. Transportation Research 13A, 91–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, A.J. and Dalziell, E. 2003. Risk evaluation and management: a road network reliability study. In The Network Reliability of Transport. Edited by Y. Iida and M.G.H. Bell. Oxford: Pergamon-Elsevier, 45–59.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, A.J. and Dante, A. (eds.). 2004. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Transportation Network Reliability (INSTR04). Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemeier, D. A. 1997. Accessibility: an evaluation using consumer welfare. Transportation 24, 377–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Primerano, F. 2003. Towards a policy-sensitive accessibility measure. Papers of the Australasian Transport Research Forum 27, paper no 35, CD-ROM. Wellington: Transit New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, A.J. and Taylor, M.A.P. 1978. A study of travel time variability on commuter journeys. High Speed Ground Transportation Journal 12(1), 77–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekhar, S.V.C. and Taylor, M.A.P. 2005. GIS approach to understanding the relationship between road network accessibility and socio-economic indicators. Proc 4th Asia Pacific Transport and Environment Conference. Xian, PRC. November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M.A.P. 1982. Travel time variability — the case of two public modes. Transportation Science 16(2), 517–521.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M.A.P. 1999. Dense network traffic models, travel time reliability and traffic management II: Application to reliability. Journal of Advanced Transportation 33(2), 235–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M.A.P. 2000. Using network reliability concepts for traffic calming — permeability, approachability and tortuosity — in network design. In Reliability of Transport Networks. Edited by M.G.H. Bell and C. Cassir. Baldock, Herts: Research Studies Press, 217–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M.A.P. and D’Este, G.M. (2004a). Critical infrastructure and transport network vulnerability: developing a method for diagnosis and assessment. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Transportation Network Reliability (INSTR04). Christchurch, August. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, 96–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M.A.P. and D’Este, G.M. 2004b. Safeguarding transport networks: assessment of network vulnerability and development of remedial measures. Australian Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering, Special Edition on Engineering a Secure Australia, 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Zuylen, H.J. 2004. The effect of irregularity of travel times on departure time choice. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Transportation Network Reliability (INSTR04). Christchurch, August. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, 253–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weibull, J.W. 1976. Axiomatic approach to the measurement of accessibility. Regional Science and Urban Economics 6, pp.357–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, H., Lo, H.K. and Tang, W.H. 2000. Travel time versus capacity reliability of a road network. In Reliability of Transport Networks. Edited by M.G.H. Bell and C. Cassir. Baldock, Herts: Research Studies Press, 119–138.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Taylor, M.A.P., D’Este, G.M. (2007). Transport Network Vulnerability: a Method for Diagnosis of Critical Locations in Transport Infrastructure Systems. In: Murray, A.T., Grubesic, T.H. (eds) Critical Infrastructure. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68056-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics