Skip to main content

Teacher and Learner Profiles for Constraint Acquisition

  • Conference paper
Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming – CP 2003 (CP 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2833))

  • 1090 Accesses

Abstract

In many practical applications users often find it difficult to articulate their constraints [1]. We have begun studying the issues involved in interactively acquiring constraints and have already made a number of novel contributions [3]. We view interactive constraint acquisition as the process of learning constraints from examples [2,4] and focus on the role the user has to play during an interactive session. If we consider our user as a teacher, it may be possible that there are things that our teacher can do to provide “better” examples even without being able to precisely articulate the target concept. We have compared a number of teacher profiles and demonstrate that the ability of the teacher (the user) and the ability of the learner (constraint acquisition system) has an impact on the acquisition process.

This work has been supported by Science Foundation Ireland under Grant 00/PI.1/C075.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Freuder, E.C., Wallace, R.J.: Suggestion strategies for constraint-based matchmaker agents. In: Maher, M.J., Puget, J.-F. (eds.) CP 1998. LNCS, vol. 1520, pp. 192–204. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Mitchell, T.: Generalization as search. Artificial Intelligence 18(2), 203–226 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. O’Connell, S., O’Sullivan, B., Freuder, E.C.: A study of query generation strategies for interactive constraint acquisition. In: Applications and Science in Soft Computing. Advances in Soft Computing Series. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sammut, C., Banerji, R.: Learning concepts by asking questions. In: Michalski, R.S., Carbonell, J.G., Mitchell, T.M. (eds.) Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach. ch. 7, vol. 2, pp. 187–191. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1986)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

O’Connell, S., O’Sullivan, B., Freuder, E.C. (2003). Teacher and Learner Profiles for Constraint Acquisition. In: Rossi, F. (eds) Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming – CP 2003. CP 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2833. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45193-8_113

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45193-8_113

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20202-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45193-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics