Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2772))

Abstract

We investigate extensions of the Dolev-Yao model of a passive intruder into a cryptographic protocol by some algebraic properties of cryptographic primitives. We provide sufficient conditions under which the intruder deduction problem is decidable in polynomial time. We apply this result to the equational theory of homomorphism, and show that in this case the intruder deduction problem is linear, provided that the messages are in normal form.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. Amadio and W. Charatonik. On name generation and set-based analysis in the Dolev-Yao model. In Proc. CONCUR’ 02, volume 2421 of LNCS, pages 499-514, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Y. Chevalier, R. Kuester, M. Rusinowitch, and M. Turuani. An NP decision procedure for protocol insecurity with XOR. In Kolaitis [9], pages 261-270.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Clark and J. Jacob. A survey of authentication protocol literature, 1997. Available via http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/~jac/papers/drareview.ps.gz.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. Comon and V. Cortier. Tree automata with one memory, set constraints and cryptographic protocols. Theoretical Comput. Sci., 2003. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Comon-Lundh and V. Shmatikov. Constraint solving, exclusive or and the decision of confidentiality for security protocols assuming a bounded number of sessions. In Kolaitis [9], pages 271-280.

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. Dershowitz and J.-P. Jouannaud. Rewrite systems. In J. van Leeuwen, editor, Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, volume B — Formal Models and Semantics, chapter 6, pages 243-320. Elsevier Science Publishers and The MIT Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Dolev and A. Yao. On the security of public key protocols. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 29(2):198–208, 1983.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. N. Durgin, P. Lincoln, J. Mitchell, and A. Scedrov. Undecidability of bounded security protocols. In Proc. Workshop on formal methods in security protocols, Trento, Italy, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Kolaitis, editor. Eighteenth Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, Ottawa, Canada, June 2003. IEEE Computer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Z. Manna and A. Pnueli. On the faithfulness of formal models. In Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science, volume 520 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 28-42. Springer-Verlag, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. McAllester. Automatic recognition of tractability in inference relations. Journal of the ACM, 40(2):284–303, 1993.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Rusinowitch and M. Turuani. Protocol insecurity with finite number of sessions, composed keys is NP-complete. Theoretical Comput. Sci., 299(1–3):451–475, 2003.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. G. J. Simmons. Cryptoanalysis and protocol failure. Commun. ACM, 37(11):56–65, Nov. 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. SPORE: The Security Protocol Open Repository. Available at http://www.lsv.ens-cachan.fr/spore/.

  15. M. Tatebayashi, N. Matsuzaki, and D. B. Newmann. Key distribution protocol for digital mobile communication systems. In G. Brassard, editor, CRYPTO’89, volume 435 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 324-334. Springer-Verlag, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Comon-Lundh, H., Treinen, R. (2003). Easy Intruder Deductions. In: Dershowitz, N. (eds) Verification: Theory and Practice. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2772. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39910-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39910-0_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-21002-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39910-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics