Skip to main content

Composition of Relations in Enterprise Architecture Models

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3256))

Abstract

Enterprise architecture focuses on modelling different domains relevant for businesses or organisations. A major issue is how to express and maintain the relations between different modelling domains. Current architectural support focuses mainly on modelling techiques and language for single domains. For enterprise architectures it is important to have the flexibility to create cross domain models and views in which inter-relations are made explicit. Therefore, a language for enterprise architecture models should pay particular attention to the relations between domain models. In this paper we present a general approach to derive an operator that allows for the composition of relations in architecture description languages. This general approach opens the door for a number of interesting application areas, two of which are worked out in more detail: the creation of more modelling flexibility, by allowing to leave out certain details, and automated abstraction and complexity reduction of models facilitating stakeholder-specific visualisations. For a specific enterprise architecture modelling language, we explicitly derive this composition operator. Because of the specific properties of this operator, the transitive closure of the metamodel of this language can be determined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bardohl, R.: GenGEd – A visual environment for visual languages. Science of Computer Programming 44(2), 181–203 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I.: The Unified Modeling Language User Guide. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bottoni, P.: Dynamic aspects of visual modeling languages. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 82(7) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Business Process Management Initiative. Business process modeling notation. working draft (1.0) (August 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Egenhofer, M.: Deriving the composition on topological binary relations. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 5(2), 133–149 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Frankel, D.: Model Driven Architecture: Applying MDA to Enterprise Computing. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Holt, R.: Binary relation algebra applied to software architecture. Technical Report 345, CSRI, University of Toronto, Canada (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. IEEE Computer Society. IEEE standard 1471-2000: Recommended practice for architectural description of software-intensive systems (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jonkers, H., van Buuren, R., et al.: Towards a language for coherent enterprise architecture descriptions. In: Steen, M., Bryant, B. (eds.) Proceedings 7th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC 2003), Brisbane, Australia, pp. 28–37 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Köth, O., Minas, M.: Abstraction in graph-transformation based diagram editors. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 50(3) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Maddux, R.: Some algebras and algorithms for reasoning about time and space. Technical report, Department of Mathematics, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Minas, M.: Concepts and realization of a diagram editor generator based on hypergraph transformation. Science of Computer Programming 44, 157–180 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Schmidt, G., Strohlein, T.: Relations and Graphs. EATCS Monographs in Computer Science. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Tarski, A.: On the calculus of relations. Journal of Symbolic Logic 6(3), 73–89 (1941)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. van der Sanden, W., Sturm, B.: Informatie Architectuur, de Infrastructurele Benadering. Panfox (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

van Buuren, R., Jonkers, H., Iacob, ME., Strating, P. (2004). Composition of Relations in Enterprise Architecture Models. In: Ehrig, H., Engels, G., Parisi-Presicce, F., Rozenberg, G. (eds) Graph Transformations. ICGT 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3256. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30203-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30203-2_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23207-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30203-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics