Skip to main content

Model Checking and Satisfiability for Sabotage Modal Logic

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2914))

Abstract

We consider the sabotage modal logic SML which was suggested by van Benthem. SML is the modal logic equipped with a ‘transition-deleting’ modality and hence a modal logic over changing models. It was shown that the problem of uniform model checking for this logic is PSPACE-complete. In this paper we show that, on the other hand, the formula complexity and the program complexity are linear, resp., polynomial time. Further we show that SML lacks nice model-theoretic properties such as bisimulation invariance, the tree model property, and the finite model property. Finally we show that the satisfiability problem for SML is undecidable. Therefore SML seems to be more related to FO than to usual modal logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benthem, J.v.: An essay on sabotage and obstruction. In: Hutter, D., Werner, S. (eds.) Festschrift in Honour of Prof. Jörg Siekmann. LNCS (LNAI), Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fagin, R., Halpern, J.Y., Moses, Y., Vardi, M.Y.: Reasoning about Knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Grädel, E.: Finite model theory and descriptive complexity. In: Finite Model Theory and Its Applications, Springer, Heidelberg (2003) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hopcroft, J.E., Motwani, R., Ullman, J.D.: Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Löding, C., Rohde, P.: Solving the sabotage game is PSPACE-hard. In: Rovan, B., Vojtáš, P. (eds.) MFCS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2747, pp. 531–540. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Schnoebelen, P.: The complexity of temporal logic model checking. In: Advances in Modal Logic – Proceedings of AiML 2002, World Scientific, Singapore (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Löding, C., Rohde, P. (2003). Model Checking and Satisfiability for Sabotage Modal Logic. In: Pandya, P.K., Radhakrishnan, J. (eds) FST TCS 2003: Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science. FSTTCS 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2914. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24597-1_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24597-1_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20680-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24597-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics