Skip to main content

Debate Stance Classification Using Word Embeddings

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Big Data Analytics and Knowledge Discovery (DaWaK 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11031))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Online debate sites act as a popular platform for users to express and form opinions. In this paper, we propose a novel unsupervised approach to perform stance classification of two-sided online debate posts. We propose the use of word embeddings to address the problem of identifying the preferred target of each aspect. We also use word embeddings to train a supervised classifier for selecting only target related aspects. The aspect-target preference information is used to model the stance classification task as an integer linear programming problem. The classifier gives an average aspect classification accuracy of 84% on multiple datasets. Our word embedding based stance classification approach gives 19.80% higher user stance classification accuracy (F1-score) compared to the existing methods. Our results suggest that the use of word embeddings improves accuracy and enables us to perform stance classification without the need for external domain-specific information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.convinceme.net, http://www.createdebate.com, and http://www.debate.org are some of the popular social debate sites.

  2. 2.

    https://nlp.stanford.edu/software/tagger.shtml .

  3. 3.

    http://sentiwordnet.isti.cnr.it/.

  4. 4.

    https://nlp.stanford.edu/software/lex-parser.shtml.

References

  1. Anand, P., Walker, M., Abbott, R., Tree, J.E.F., Bowmani, R., Minor, M.: Cats rule and dogs drool! classifying stance in online debate. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity and Sentiment Analysis, pp. 1–9. ACL (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burfoot, C., Bird, S., Baldwin, T.: Collective classification of congressional floor-debate transcripts. In: Proceedings of ACL HLT 2011, pp. 1506–1515. ACL (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ghosh, S., Anand, K., Rajanala, S., Reddy, A.B., Singh, M.: Unsupervised stance classification in online debates. In: Proceedings of the ACM India Joint International Conference on Data Science and Management of Data, pp. 30–36. ACM (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hu, M., Liu, B.: Mining opinion features in customer reviews. In: Proceedings of AAAI 2004, vol. 4, pp. 755–760 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Krejzl, P., Steinberger, J.: Uwb at semeval-2016 task 6: stance detection. In: Proceedings of SemEval@ NAACL-HLT, pp. 408–412 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Levy, O., Goldberg, Y.: Dependency-based word embeddings. In: Proceedings of ACL 2014, pp. 302–308 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Liu, B., Hu, M., Cheng, J.: Opinion observer: analyzing and comparing opinions on the web. In: Proceedings of WWW 2005, pp. 342–351. ACM (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, Q., Liu, B., Zhang, Y., Kim, D.S., Gao, Z.: Improving opinion aspect extraction using semantic similarity and aspect associations. In: Proceedings of AAAI 2016, pp. 2986–2992. AAAI Press (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lu, Y., Wang, H., Zhai, C., Roth, D.: Unsupervised discovery of opposing opinion networks from forum discussions. In: Proceedings of CIKM 2012, pp. 1642–1646. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G.S., Dean, J.: Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: Proceedings of NIPS 2013, pp. 3111–3119 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mohammad, S.M.: # emotional tweets. In: Proceedings of SemEval 2012, pp. 246–255. ACL (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mohammad, S.M., Turney, P.D.: NRC emotion lexicon. NRC Technical report (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pfohl, S.R., Triebe, O.: Stance detection for the fake news challenge with attention and conditional encoding. In: Stanford CS224d Deep Learning for NLP final project (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Somasundaran, S., Wiebe, J.: Recognizing stances in online debates. In: Proceedings of ACL-IJCNLP 2009, pp. 226–234. ACL (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thomas, M., Pang, B., Lee, L.: Get out the vote: determining support or opposition from congressional floor-debate transcripts. In: Proceedings of EMNLP 2006, pp. 327–335. ACL (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Walker, M.A., Anand, P., Abbott, R., Grant, R.: Stance classification using dialogic properties of persuasion. In: Proceedings of ACL 2012, pp. 592–596. ACL (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Xu, L., Liu, K., Zhao, J., et al.: Joint opinion relation detection using one-class deep neural network. In: Proceedings of the COLING 2014, vol. 14, pp. 677–687 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anand Konjengbam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Konjengbam, A., Ghosh, S., Kumar, N., Singh, M. (2018). Debate Stance Classification Using Word Embeddings. In: Ordonez, C., Bellatreche, L. (eds) Big Data Analytics and Knowledge Discovery. DaWaK 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11031. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98539-8_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98539-8_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98538-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98539-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics