Abstract
Interactions among drivers and pedestrians especially in heavy urban traffic constitute a key issue that needs to be addressed in the future autonomous vehicles. There is little evidence, however, concerning the signals and cues used by the drivers to infer the future intention of a pedestrian and/or a pedestrian’s awareness of the driver’s vehicle. The paper reports preliminary findings of an instrumented observational study of naturally occurring vehicle – pedestrian interaction cases at high density un-signalized urban crossings. Specifically, 21 experienced drivers drove their own car in a predefined course while equipped with an eye-tracker. In total 321driver – pedestrian interaction cases were analysed based on driver’s eye-gaze analysis and video-assisted retrospective commentary. Several types of signals were identified. These were stratified according to their expressiveness/explicitness. A main finding is that cues with a medium level of expressiveness/explicitness (i.e. eye-gaze from pedestrians) seem to resolve a great number of interaction cases, therefore it is important to explicitly consider this type of cues in future autonomous vehicles. The paper ends with a working model depicting the possible states of mutual attentiveness between driver and pedestrian as identified from the observation data.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Wilde GJS (1976) Social interaction patterns in driver behavior: an introductory review. Hum Factors 18(5):477–492
Mitman M, Ragland D (2007) Crosswalk confusion: more evidence why pedestrian and driver knowledge of the vehicle code should not be assumed. Transp Res Rec: J Transp Res Board 2002:55–63
Hatfield J, Fernandes R, Job RS, Smith K (2007) Misunderstanding of right-of-way rules at various pedestrian crossing types: observational study and survey. Acc Anal Prev 39(4):833–842
Yang S (2017) Driver behavior impact on pedestrians’ crossing experience in the conditionally autonomous driving context. Master of Science Thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology
Guéguen N, Meineri S, Eyssartier C (2015) A pedestrian’s stare and drivers’ stopping behavior: a field experiment at the pedestrian crossing. Saf Sci 75:87–89
Ren Z, Jiang X, Wang W (2016) Analysis of the influence of pedestrians’ eye contact on drivers’ comfort boundary during the crossing conflict. Procedia Eng 137:399–406
Lagström T, Lundgren VM (2015) AVIP - Autonomous vehicles’ interaction with pedestrians. Master of Science Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology
Wu J, Austin R, Chen C-L (2011) Incidence rates of pedestrian and bicyclist crashes by hybrid electric passenger vehicles: An update. DOT HS 811 526. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC (2011)
Faria JJ, Krause S, Krause J (2010) Collective behavior in road crossing pedestrians: the role of social information. Behav Ecol 21(6):1236–1242
Šucha M (2014) Road users’ strategies and communication: driver-pedestrian interaction. In: 2014 Proceedings of transport research arena (TRA)
Guéguen N, Eyssartier C, Meineri S (2016) A pedestrian’s smile and drivers’ behavior: when a smile increases careful driving. J Saf Res 56:83–88
Ericsson KA, Simon HA (1993) Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Portouli E, Nathanael D, Marmaras N (2014) Drivers’ communicative interactions: on-road observations and modelling for integration in future automation systems. Ergonomics 57(12):1795–1805
Acknowledgement
This work is a part of the interACT project. interACT has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research & innovation programme under grant agreement no 723395. Content reflects only the authors’ view and European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
Recruitment of participants and data collection was conducted in accordance with National Technical University of Athens ethics procedures concerning research involving human participants.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Nathanael, D., Portouli, E., Papakostopoulos, V., Gkikas, K., Amditis, A. (2019). Naturalistic Observation of Interactions Between Car Drivers and Pedestrians in High Density Urban Settings. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 823. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96074-6_42
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96074-6_42
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96073-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96074-6
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)