Skip to main content

Performability Analysis Methods for Clustered WSNs as Enabling Technology for IoT

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Performability in Internet of Things

Part of the book series: EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing ((EAISICC))

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) where sensors are used to couple the physical infrastructure with information and communication technologies is the main concept enabling applications such as smart homes, smart cities and intelligent transportation. The distributed sensor networks are used for interconnecting devices to transmit measured information, and control instructions. Therefore, energy efficiency and performability of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) are critical for IoT applications. It is possible to combine WSN nodes into smaller groups and set one of the nodes as cluster head (CH) in order to increase the energy efficiency and decrease transmission delay. This approach of combining sensor nodes is known as clustering. Clustering is a technique that has been widely applied for achieving goals such as prolonging the network lifetime, improving scalability and balancing the residual energy of all nodes. Development of algorithms using equal and unequal clustering techniques has been a popular topic in recent studies. Most of these techniques use residual energy of nodes and distance to base station as parameters for selecting cluster heads.

This chapter considers analytical modelling approaches of homogeneous clustered WSNs with a centrally located CH responsible for coordinating cluster communication. Unlike most of the existing studies, the performance and energy efficiency of the cluster head are considered together. Furthermore, potential failure of WSN nodes is considered and performance and availability models are integrated as well as the potential repair or replacement of sensor nodes. Existing techniques used in performance evaluation of multiserver systems in general are investigated and analysed in detail. Similarly, pure availability modelling approaches are also analysed. Pure performance modelling techniques, pure availability models and performability models are considered critically for WSN configurations. Since the pure performance models tend to be too optimistic and pure availability models are too conservative, performability models are used in turn for the evaluation.

The two-dimensional continuous-time Markov chains (CTMC) which are popularly used in performability analysis are considered together with queuing theory, in order to merge the performance and reliability processes which are relatively mutually independent. The possible use of open queuing networks to model the behaviour of the CH which is expecting intra-cluster as well as inter-cluster traffic while in various operative states is discussed. Among the possible operative conditions, we have states where the servers are broken, fully operational states, states with degraded service facilities and states where sleep scheduling mechanisms are also incorporated to extend the proposed energy models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. A.P. Abidoye, I.C. Obagbuwa, Models for integrating wireless sensor networks into the internet of things. IET Wireless Sens. Syst. 7(3), 65–72 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Al-Fuqaha, M. Guizani, M. Mohammadi, M. Aledhari, M. Ayyash, Internet of things: a survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 17(4), 2347–2376 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M.A. Ameen, S.M.R. Islam, K.S. Kwak, Energy saving mechanisms for MAC protocols in wireless sensor networks. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 2010, Article ID 163413 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. G. Anastasi, M. Conti, M.D. Francesco, Extending the lifetime of wireless sensor networks through adaptive sleep. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 5(3), 351–365 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Q.M. Ashraf, M.H. Habaebi, Autonomic schemes for threat mitigation in internet of things. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 49, 112–127 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. L. Atzori, A. Iera, G. Morabito, Understanding the internet of things: definition, potentials, and societal role of a fast evolving paradigm. Ad Hoc Netw. 56, 122–140 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M.D. Beaudry, Performance-related reliability measures for computing systems. IEEE Trans. Comput. 6, 540–547 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. R. Chakka, Performance and reliability modelling of computing systems using spectral expansion. PhD, Newcastle University (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Chakka, Spectral expansion solution for some finite capacity queues. Ann. Oper. Res. 79, 27–44 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Chakka, E. Ever, O. Gemikonakli, Joint-state modeling for open queuing networks with breakdowns, repairs and finite buffers, in 15th International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems, 2007. MASCOTS’07 (2007), pp. 260–266

    Google Scholar 

  11. W.H.R. Chan, P. Zhang, W. Zhang, I. Nevat, A.C. Valera, H. Tan, N. Gautam, Adaptive duty cycling in sensor networks via continuous time Markov chain modelling, in 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2015, London, 8–12 June 2015, pp. 6669–6674

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. Chiasserini, M. Garetto, An analytical model for wireless sensor networks with sleeping nodes. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 5(12), 1706–1718 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. L. Columbus, Internet of things market to reach $267 B by 2020 (2017), https://www.forbes.com

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. El Kafhali, K. Salah, Efficient and dynamic scaling of fog nodes for IoT devices. J. Supercomput. 73, 5261–5284 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. E. Ever, Fault-tolerant two-stage open queuing systems with server failures at both stages. IEEE Commun. Lett. 18(9), 1523–1526 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. E. Ever, O. Gemikonakli, A. Koçyigit, E. Gemikonakli, A hybrid approach to minimize state space explosion problem for the solution of two stage tandem queues. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 36(2), 908–926 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. E. Gelenbe, Product-form queueing networks with negative and positive customers. J. Appl. Probab. 28(3), 656–663 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. P. Heidelberger, K.S. Trivedi, Queueing network models for parallel processing with asynchronous tasks. IEEE Trans. Comput. 11, 1099–1109 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Javed, H. Larijani, A. Ahmadinia, R. Emmanuel, M. Mannion, D. Gibson, Design and implementation of a cloud enabled random neural network-based decentralized smart controller with intelligent sensor nodes for HVAC. IEEE Internet Things J. 4(2), 393–403 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. R. Jurdak, A.G. Ruzzelli, G.M. O’Hare, Radio sleep mode optimization in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 9(7), 955–968 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. J. Li, Y.Q. Zhao, F.R. Yu, X. Huang, Queuing analysis of two-hop relay technology in LTE/LTE-A networks with unsaturated and asymmetric traffic. IEEE Internet Things J. 3(3), 378–385 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. A. Meola, What is the Internet of Things (IoT)? Business Insider (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. J.F. Meyer, On evaluating the performability of degradable computing systems. IEEE Trans. Comput. 8, 720–731 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. I. Mitrani, R. Chakka, Spectral expansion solution for a class of Markov models: application and comparison with the matrix-geometric method. Perform. Eval. 23(3), 241–260 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Z. Mukter, H.W. Yand, Md.I. Shabiul, N. Amin, An integrated hybrid energy harvester for autonomous wireless sensor network nodes. Int. J. Photoenergy 2014, 760534 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. Munir, A. Gordon-Ross, Markov modeling of fault-tolerant wireless sensor networks, in Proceedings of 20th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, ICCCN 2011, Maui, HI, 31 July–4 August, pp. 1–6 2011

    Google Scholar 

  27. A. Munir, J. Antoon, A. Gordon-Ross, Modeling and analysis of fault detection and fault tolerance in wireless sensor networks. ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst. 14(1), 3:1–3:43 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  28. M.F. Neuts, Matrix-Geometric Solutions in Stochastic Models: An Algorithmic Approach (Courier Corporation, New York, 1981)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. A.J. Odey, D. Li, Low power transceiver design parameters for wireless sensor networks. Wirel. Sens. Netw. 4, 243–249 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. F.A. Omondi, E. Ever, P. Shah, O. Gemikonakli, Modelling wireless sensor networks for performability evaluation, in International Conference on Ad-Hoc Networks and Wireless (Springer, New York, 2013), pp. 172–184

    Google Scholar 

  31. F.A. Omondi, P. Shah, O. Gemikonakli, E. Ever, An analytical model for bounded WSNs with unreliable cluster heads and links, in 2015 IEEE 40th Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN) (IEEE, Clearwater Beach, 2015), pp. 201–204

    Google Scholar 

  32. T. Qiu, L. Feng, F. Xia, G. Wu, Y. Zhou, A packet buffer evaluation method exploiting queueing theory for wireless sensor networks. Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst. 8, 1028–1049 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. I. Silva, L.A. Guedes, P. Portugal, F. Vasques, Reliability and availability evaluation of wireless sensor networks for industrial applications. Sensors 12(1), 806–838 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. K.S. Trivedi, Probability and Statistics with Reliability, Queuing and Computer Science Applications (Wiley, Chichester, 2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. K.S. Trivedi, M. Malhotra, Reliability and performability techniques and tools: a survey, in MMB (1993), pp. 27–48

    Google Scholar 

  36. K.S. Trivedi, X. Ma, S. Dharmaraja, Performability modelling of wireless communication systems. Int. J. Commun. Syst. 16(6), 561–577 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. C. Wang, L. Xing, V. Vokkarane, Y.L. Sun, Reliability and lifetime modeling of wireless sensor nodes. Microelectron. Reliab. 54(1), 160–166 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. O. Yang, W. Heinzelman, An adaptive sensor sleeping solution based on sleeping multipath routing and duty-cycled MAC protocols. ACM Trans. Sensor Netw. 10(1), 10 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Y. Zhang, W.W. Li, Modeling and energy consumption evaluation of a stochastic wireless sensor network. EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw. 2012, 282 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. H. Zhou, D. Luo, Y. Gao, D.C. Zuo, Modeling of node energy consumption for wireless sensor networks. Wirel. Sensor Netw. 3(1), 18–23 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enver Ever .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ever, E. (2019). Performability Analysis Methods for Clustered WSNs as Enabling Technology for IoT. In: Al-Turjman, F. (eds) Performability in Internet of Things. EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93557-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93557-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93556-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93557-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics