Abstract
Locke’s liberal democratic theory advocates toleration, to broker a peace among faiths. Secular common knowledge, including science, is used to adjudicate neutrally in disputes across all faiths. Some politicized religious groups have now begun to question the possibility of neutral arbitration, by denying any common knowledge. Secularism instead seems to be a rival to their faith. The belief in viable knowledge fracture, however, relies on a mistaken philosophy of science which allows that any general result in science is only a matter of opinion because theory is ever empirically underdetermined. True, but it may not be experimentally underdetermined. Religious politicians need to rethink their priorities, for they are losing their youth as we speak and fast giving up on a precarious peace.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bacon, Francis. 2000 [1620]. The New Organon. Editor by Lise Jardine and Michael Silverthorne. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Feyerabend, Paul. 1975. Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. London and New York: New Left Books.
Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of a Prison. New York: Random House.
Horgan, John. 2017. Did Thomas Kuhn Help Elect Donald Trump? Filmmaker Errol Morris Claims Kuhn’s Critique of Science Paved the Way for a Post-Truth Presidency. Scientific American (5/25/17).
Hume, David. 1993 [1777]. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Editor by Eric Steinberg. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Locke, John. 1965 [1690]. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Editor by John Yolton. London: Everyman Press.
Poincaré, Henri. 1905. Science and Hypothesis. Translated by W. J. Greenstreet. London: W. Scott.
Popper, Karl R. 1959 [1934]. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.
Quine, Willard V.O. 1975. On Empirically Equivalent Systems of the World. Erkenntnis 9: 313–328.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hattiangadi, J. (2019). Fractured Knowledge: “Fake News”. In: Sassower, R., Laor, N. (eds) The Impact of Critical Rationalism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90826-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90826-7_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90825-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90826-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)