Skip to main content

A Trie-structured Bayesian Model for Unsupervised Morphological Segmentation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (CICLing 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10761))

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce a trie-structured Bayesian model for unsupervised morphological segmentation. We adopt prior information from different sources in the model. We use neural word embeddings to discover words that are morphologically derived from each other and thereby that are semantically similar. We use letter successor variety counts obtained from tries that are built by neural word embeddings. Our results show that using different information sources such as neural word embeddings and letter successor variety as prior information improves morphological segmentation in a Bayesian model. Our model outperforms other unsupervised morphological segmentation models on Turkish and gives promising results on English and German for scarce resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We assign 0.25 as the threshold following [21].

  2. 2.

    In the experiments, we assign \(\lambda =4\).

References

  1. Bordag, S.: Unsupervised knowledge-free morpheme boundary detection. In: Proceedings of the RANLP 2005 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bordag, S.: Two-step approach to unsupervised morpheme segmentation. In: Proceedings of 2nd Pascal Challenges Workshop, pp. 25–29 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bordag, S.: Unsupervised and knowledge-free morpheme segmentation and analysis. In: Peters, C., et al. (eds.) CLEF 2007. LNCS, vol. 5152, pp. 881–891. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85760-0_113

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Can, B.: Statistical models for unsupervised learning of morphology and POS tagging. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science, The University of York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Can, B., Manandhar, S.: Probabilistic hierarchical clustering of morphological paradigms. In: Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, EACL 2012, pp. 654–663. Association for Computational Linguistics (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Casella, G., George, E.I.: Explaining the Gibbs sampler. Am. Stat. 46(3), 167–174 (1992)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Creutz, M.: Unsupervised segmentation of words using prior distributions of morph length and frequency. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 280–287. Association for Computational Linguistics (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Creutz, M., Lagus, K.: Unsupervised discovery of morphemes. In: Proceedings of the ACL-02 Workshop on Morphological and Phonological Learning, pp. 21–30. Association for Computational Linguistics (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Creutz, M., Lagus, K.: Inducing the morphological lexicon of a natural language from unannotated text. In: Proceedings of the International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Adaptive Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (AKRR 2005), pp. 106–113 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Creutz, M., Lagus, K.: Unsupervised models for morpheme segmentation and morphology learning. ACM Trans. Speech Lang. Process. 4, 1–34 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Déjean, H.: Morphemes as necessary concept for structures discovery from untagged corpora. In: Proceedings of the Joint Conferences on New Methods in Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, pp. 295–298. Association for Computational Linguistics (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goldwater, S., Johnson, M., Griffiths, T.L.: Interpolating between types and tokens by estimating power-law generators. In: Weiss, Y., Schölkopf, B., Platt, J. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 18, pp. 459–466. MIT Press, Cambridge (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hafer, M.A., Weiss, S.F.: Word segmentation by letter successor varieties. Inf. Storage Retriev. 10(11–12), 371–385 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hankamer, J.: Finite state morphology and left to right phonology. Proc. West Coast Conf. Formal Linguist. 5, 41–52 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Harris, Z.S.: From phoneme to morpheme. Language 31(2), 190–222 (1955)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kurimo, M., Lagus, K., Virpioja, S., Turunen, V.: Morpho challenge 2010. http://research.ics.tkk.fi/events/morphochallenge2010/ (2011). Accessed 31 Jan 2017

  17. Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., Dean, J.: Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. CoRR abs/1301.3781 (2013). http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3781

  18. Narasimhan, K., Barzilay, R., Jaakkola, T.S.: An unsupervised method for uncovering morphological chains. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. 3, 157–167 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Snyder, B., Barzilay, R.: Unsupervised multilingual learning for morphological segmentation. In: Proceedings of ACL-08: HLT, pp. 737–745. Association for Computational Linguistics, June 2008

    Google Scholar 

  20. Soricut, R., Och, F.: Unsupervised morphology induction using word embeddings. In: Proceedings of the Human Language Technologies: The 2015 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the ACL, pp. 1627–1637. Association for Computational Linguistics (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Üstün, A., Can, B.: Unsupervised morphological segmentation using neural word embeddings. In: Král, P., Martín-Vide, C. (eds.) SLSP 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9918, pp. 43–53. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45925-7_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) with the project number EEEAG-115E464.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murathan Kurfalı .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kurfalı, M., Üstün, A., Can, B. (2018). A Trie-structured Bayesian Model for Unsupervised Morphological Segmentation. In: Gelbukh, A. (eds) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10761. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77113-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77113-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77112-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77113-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics