Skip to main content

Co-benefits of Climate Change Mitigation

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Climate Action

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adler J (2000) Greenhouse policy without regrets. A free market approach to the uncertain risks of climate change. The Competitive Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC. http://www.cei.org/PDFs/no_regrets.pdf. Accessed 11 Jan 2019

  • Bach CF (2016) Assessing co-benefits could accelerate action on climate change. EURACTIV Opinion. https://www.euractiv.com/section/climate-environment/opinion/assessing-co-benefits-could-accelerate-action-on-climate-change/. Accessed 11 Jan 2019

  • Bollen J, Guay B, Jamet S, Corfee-Morlot J (2009) Co-benefits of climate change mitigation policies: literature review and new results. OECD economics department working papers, No. 693. OECD Publishing, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Borbonus S (2017) Generating socio-economic values from renewable energies – questions and assessment methods. IASS working paper. IASS, Potsdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Council on Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW), Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) (2017) Greening India’s workforce – gearing up for expansion of solar and wind power in India. Issue Paper June 2017. https://www.nrdc.org/sites/default/files/greening-india-workforce.pdf. Accessed 11 Jan 2019

  • Deng HM, Liang QM, Liu LJ, Diaz Anadon L (2018) Co-benefits of greenhouse gas mitigation: a review and classification by type, mitigation sector, and geography. Environ Res Lett 12(12):123001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) (2015) Sustainable development benefits of low-carbon transport measures. Guidance for policy makers on the political potential of co-benefits. GIZ Report/TRANSfer project. http://transferproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/giz_TRANSfer_2015_Sustainable-developement-benefits-of-low-carbon-transport-measures_web.pdf. Accessed 11 Jan 2019

  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2015) Climate change in the United States – benefits of global action. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Energy Assessment (GEA) (2012) Global energy assessment. Toward a sustainable future. University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Helgenberger S, Jänicke M (2017) Mobilizing the co-benefits of climate change mitigation connecting opportunities with interests in the new energy world of renewables. IASS working paper, July 2017. https://www.iass-potsdam.de/sites/default/files/files/iass_working_paper_co_benefits.pdf. Accessed 11 Jan 2019

  • Helgenberger S, Gürtler K, Borbonus S, Okunlola A, Jänicke M (2017) Mobilizing the co-benefits of climate change mitigation. Building new alliances – seizing opportunities – raising climate ambitions in the new energy world of renewables. COBENEFITS impulse paper, IASS Potsdam 11/2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Independent Power Producer Office (IPP Office) (2018) Independent power producers procurement programme (IPPPP). Quarterly report 2018 (forthcoming). Centurion

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS)/COBENEFITS (2018a) COBENEFITS Approach: ensuring political ownership and relevance with strategic co-benefit assessments. Background document. https://www.cobenefits.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/IASS_COBENEFITS_Approach_180131.pdf. Accessed 11 Jan 2019

  • Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS)/ COBENEFITS (2018b) Activating the co-benefits for a successful implementation of the Paris Agreement. COP24 Briefing on key discussion items on the Paris Rulebook. COBENEFITS Briefing Paper. https://www.cobenefits.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/IASS_COBENEFITS_COP24-Briefing.pdf. Accessed 16 Jan 2019

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2001) Climate change 2001: mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Climate change 2007: mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK/New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (IEA) (2014) Capturing the multiple benefits of energy efficiency. International Energy Agency, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) (2014) The socio-economic benefits of solar and wind energy. Abu Dhabi, IRENA

    Google Scholar 

  • International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) (2016) Renewable energy benefits: measuring the economics. Abu Dhabi, IRENA

    Google Scholar 

  • International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) (2018) Renewable energy and jobs: annual review 2018. Abu Dhabi, IRENA

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakob M, Steckel JC (2016) Implications of climate change mitigation for sustainable development. Environ Res Lett 11(10):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jänicke M, Schreurs M, Töpfer K (2015) The potential of multi-level global climate governance. IASS policy brief 2/2015. IASS, Potsdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahla F, Holstenkamp L, Müller JR, Degenhart H (2017) Entwicklung und Stand von Bürgerenergiegesellschaften und Energiegenossenschaften in Deutschland. Working paper series in business and law, 27. https://www.buendnis-buergerenergie.de/fileadmin/user_upload/wpbl27_BEG-Stand_Entwicklungen.pdf. Accessed 11 Jan 2019

  • Khosla R, Dukkipati S, Dubash NK, Sreenivas A, Cohen B (2015) Towards methodologies for multiple objective-based energy and climate policy. Econ Polit Wkly 1(49):49–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer RA (2016) Co-benefits of the Energiewende. Blog Post. http://raandreaskraemer.blogspot.de/2016/03/co-benefits-of-energiewende.html. Accessed 11 Jan 2019

  • Krupnick A, Burtraw D, Markandya A (2000) The ancillary benefits and costs of climate change mitigation: a conceptual framework. Ancillary benefits and costs of greenhouse gas mitigation. OECD, Paris, pp 53–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Low Emission Development Strategies Global Partnership (LEDS GP) (2016) Benefits working group factsheet. LEDS Global Partnership. http://ledsgp.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/BWG-factsheet_Proof1_A4_web-res-1.pdf. Accessed 11 Jan 2019

  • Ma Z, Xue B, Geng Y, Ren W, Fujita T, Zhang Z, Puppim de Oliveira JA, Jacques DA, Xi F (2013) Co-benefits analysis on climate change and environmental effects of wind-power: a case study from Xinjiang, China. Renew Energy 57:35–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mayrhofer JP, Gupta J (2016) The science and politics of co-benefits in climate policy. Environ Sci Pol 57:22–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of the Environment Government of Japan (2009) Manual for quantitative evaluation of the co-benefits approach to climate change projects. Tokyo. https://www.env.go.jp/en/earth/cc/manual_qecba.pdf. Accessed 11 Jan 2019

  • Næss-Schmidt HS, Hansen MB, von Utfall Danielsson C (2012) Multiple benefits of investing in energy efficient renovation of buildings. Copenhagen Economics. https://www.copenhageneconomics.com/publications/publication/multiple-benefits-of-investing-in-energy-efficient-renovation-of-buildings. Accessed 11 Jan 2019

  • New Climate Economy (2014) Better growth, better climate. The new climate economy report. The Global Commission on the Economy and Climate, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • New Climate Economy (2018) Unlocking the inclusive growth story of the 21st century: accelerating climate action in urgent times. The new climate economy report. The Global Commission on the Economy and Climate, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor D, Dessus S, (1999) Climate policy without tears: CGE-Based ancillary benefits estimates for chile, OECD development center working paper , Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2000) Ancillary benefits and costs of greenhouse gas mitigation, OECD Publishing, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • trend:research (2017) Eigentümerstruktur: Erneuerbare Energien. Entwicklung der Akteursvielfalt, Rolle der Energieversorger, Ausblick bis 2020. Bremen, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Umweltbundesamt (2017) SD-Benefits in Future Market Mechanisms under the UNFCCC. Climate Change 04/2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Umweltbundesamt/DEHSt (2015, August) Reforming the CDM SD Tool – recommendations for improvement. Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP) (2015) Valuing the sustainable development co-benefits of climate change mitigation actions. The case of the waste sector and recommendations for the design of nationally appropriate mitigation actions (NAMAs). United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (2015a) Paris agreement. In: 21st conference of the Parties of the UNFCCC, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (2015b) Decision 1/CP.21. Adoption of the Paris agreement. FCCC/CP/2015/10/Add.1. In: 21st conference of the Parties of the UNFCCC, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (2018) Global climate action summit brings surge of new commitments and calls for increased government action, UN Climate Press Release, 14 Sep, 2018. https://unfccc.int/news/global-climate-action-summit-brings-surge-of-new-commitments-and-calls-for-increased-government. Accessed 11 Jan 2019

  • Ürge-Vorsatz D, Tirado Herrero S, Dubash NK, Lecocq F (2014) Measuring the co-benefits of climate change mitigation. Annu Rev Environ Resour 39:549–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Schaik LG, Schunz S (2012) Explaining EU activism and impact in global climate politics: is the Union a norm- or interest-driven actor. J Common Mark Stud 50(1):169–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2012) Typology of activities with climate co-benefits by WB sector. Washington, DC. http://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/document/Typology.pdf. Accessed 11 Jan 2019

  • World Bank (2014) Climate-smart development. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Xue B, Ma Z, Geng Y, Heck P, Ren W, Tobias M, Maas A, Jiang P, Puppim de Oliveira JA, Fujita T (2015) A life cycle co-benefits assessment of wind power in China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 41:338–346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Helgenberger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Helgenberger, S., Jänicke, M., Gürtler, K. (2019). Co-benefits of Climate Change Mitigation. In: Leal Filho, W., Azul, A., Brandli, L., Özuyar, P., Wall, T. (eds) Climate Action. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71063-1_93-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71063-1_93-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71063-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71063-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics