Abstract
Entrepreneurship research is increasingly taking into account external factors in order to provide context for the conditions under which new firms are created. Thus, the entrepreneur is increasingly recognized as a constituent part of the ecosystems in which they operate. In addition, a strong and vibrant ecosystem should be host to diversity—the presence of migrant entrepreneurs is a sign of this diversity, contributing to the ecosystem at the city level. This chapter focusses on a particular group of entrepreneurs, Polish migrant entrepreneurs based in the city of Glasgow, UK, and provides details of exploratory research that examines the influence of the entrepreneurial ecosystem on their new venture creation process. In order to examine which external factors are of importance developing vibrant ecosystems, and to draw attention to the role of proximities in facilitating their use by Polish migrant entrepreneurs, this chapter synthesizes the current entrepreneurial ecosystem literature with that discussing opportunity structure and proximity. The results suggest that both geographic and cultural proximity are important factors in accessing market and resources within the local migrant community. However, it also appears that despite positive effects in the start-up phase, the high level of proximity displayed between entrepreneurs and their market base can constrain future business growth potential—leading to a lack of diversity and suggesting a lack of local diversity within the community based sub-ecosystem.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
But they did not start up in all inner city areas, such as Govan or Ibrox, with high numbers of Polish migrants..
- 2.
Business Gateway is a publicly funded business support institution in Scotland. Along with other services it provides advice and training for new businesses..
References
Ács ZJ, Autio E, Szerb L (2014) National systems of entrepreneurship: measurement issues and policy implications. Res Policy 43(3):476–494. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.016
Agarwal R, Audretsch D, Sarkar M (2007) The process of creative construction: knowledge spillovers, entrepreneurship, and economic growth. Strateg Entrepreneurship J 1(3–4):263–286
Aguiléra A, Lethiais V, Rallet A (2012) Spatial and non-spatial proximities in inter-firm relations: an empirical analysis. Industry and Innovation 19(3):187–202
Aldrich HE, Waldinger R (1990) Ethnicity and entrepreneurship. Annu Rev Sociol 111–135
Bathelt H, Glückler J (2003) Toward a relational economic geography. J Econ Geogr 3(2):117–144
Bathelt H, Malmberg A, Maskell P (2004) Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Prog Hum Geogr 28(1):31–56
Baumol WJ (1993) Formal entrepreneurship theory in economics: existence and bounds. J Bus Ventur 8(3):197–210
Boschma R (2005) Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Reg Stud 39(1):61–74
Burke A, FitzRoy F, Nolan M (2002) Self-employment wealth and job creation: the roles of gender, non-pecuniary motivation and entrepreneurial ability. Small Bus Econ 19(3):255–270. doi:10.1023/A:1019698607772
Cavusgil ST, Knight G (2015) The born global firm: an entrepreneurial and capabilities perspective on early and rapid internationalization. J Int Bus Stud 46(1):3–16
Cope J (2005) Researching entrepreneurship through phenomenological inquiry philosophical and methodological issues. Int Small Bus J 23(2):163–189
Coviello NE (2006) The network dynamics of international new ventures. J Int Bus Stud 37(5):713–731
Cowan R, David PA, Foray D (2000) The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness. Ind Corp Change 9(2):211–253
Crick D, Chaudhry S, Batstone S (2001) An investigation into the overseas expansion of small Asian-owned UK firms. Small Bus Econ 16(2):75–94
Crozier M, Friedberg E (1977) L’acteur et le système: les contraintes de l’action collective. [The actor and the system: the constraints of collective action]. Paris: Éditions du Seuil
Deakins D, Ishaq M, Smallbone D, Whittam G, Wyper J (2007) Ethnic minority businesses in Scotland and the role of social capital. Int Small Bus J 25(3):307–326
Drori I, Honig B, Wright M (2009) Transnational entrepreneurship: an emergent field of study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 33(5):1001–1022
Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):532–550
Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Acad Manag J 50(1):25–32
Engelen E (2001) ‘Breaking in’ and ‘breaking out’: a Weberian approach to entrepreneurial opportunities. J Ethn Migr Stud 27(2):203–223. doi:10.1080/13691830020041570
Engelen E (2006) Towards an explanation of the performance differences of Turks in the Netherlands and Germany: the case for a comparative political economy of integration. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 97(1):69–79. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9663.2006.00497.x
Foley D, O’Connor AJ (2013) Social capital and the networking practices of indigenous entrepreneurs. J Small Bus Manage 51(2):276–296. doi:10.1111/jsbm.12017
Garud R, Gehman J, Giuliani AP (2014) Contextualizing entrepreneurial innovation: a narrative perspective. Res Policy 43(7):1177–1188
Geertz C (1973) The interpretation of cultures: selected essays, vol 5019. Basic books
Gertler MS (1995) “Being there”: proximity, organization, and culture in the development and adoption of advanced manufacturing technologies. Econ Geogr 1–26
Gertler MS (2003) Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being (there). J Econ Geogr 3(1):75–99
Glasgow City Council (2012) Population and households by ethnicity in glasgow estimates of changes 2001–2010 for community planning partnership areas and neighbourhoods
Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am J Sociol 481–510
Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 1360–1380
Håkanson L (2005) Epistemic communities and cluster dynamics: on the role of knowledge in industrial districts. Industry and Innovation 12(4):433–463
Hjerm M (2004) Immigrant entrepreneurship in the swedish welfare state. Sociology 38(4):739–756. doi:10.1177/0038038504045862
Home Office (2009) Accession monitoring report. UK Border Agency, London
Howells JR (2002) Tacit knowledge, innovation and economic geography. Urban Stud 39(5–6):871–884
Isenberg D (2010) How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Bus Rev 88(6):40–50
Isenberg D (2011) The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. Presentation at the Institute of International and European Affairs
Johnston A, Prokop D, Crone M, Masango S, Lassalle P (2016) Assessing the characteristics, determinants and spatial variations of internationalised new ventures in the UK. Enterprise Research Council
Jones T, Barrett G, McEvoy D (2000) Market potential as a decisive influence on the performance of ethnic minority business. In: Immigrant businesses: the economic, political and social environment, pp 37–53
Jones T, Ram M (2010) Review article: ethnic variations on the small firm labour process. Int Small Bus J 28(2):163–173
Jones T, Ram M, Edwards P, Kiselinchev A, Muchenje L (2014) Mixed embeddedness and new migrant enterprise in the UK. Entrepreneurship & Reg Dev 26(5–6):500–520. doi:10.1080/08985626.2014.950697
Kelly B, Ashe S (2014) Local dynamics of diversity: evidence from the 2011 Census
Klag M, Langley A (2013) Approaching the conceptual leap in qualitative research. Int J Manage Rev 15(2):149–166
Klein PG (2008) Opportunity discovery, entrepreneurial action, and economic organization. Strateg Entrepreneurship J 2(3):175–190
Kloosterman R, Rath J (2001) Immigrant entrepreneurs in advanced economies: mixed embeddedness further explored. J Ethnic and Migr Stud 27(2):189–201
Kloosterman RC (2010) Matching opportunities with resources: a framework for analysing (migrant) entrepreneurship from a mixed embeddedness perspective. Entrepreneurship & Reg Dev 22(1):25–45. doi:10.1080/08985620903220488
Lagendijk A, Lorentzen A (2007) Proximity, knowledge and innovation in peripheral regions. On the intersection between geographical and organizational proximity. Eur Plan Stud 15(4):457–466
Leitch CM, Hill FM, Harrison RT (2010) The philosophy and practice of interpretivist research in entrepreneurship: quality, validation, and trust. Organ Res Methods 13(1):67–84. doi:10.1177/1094428109339839
Light I, Dana L-P (2013) Boundaries of social capital in entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Pract 37(3):603–624. doi:10.1111/etap.12016
Malecki EJ (2011) Regional social capital: why it matters. Reg Stud 46(8):1023–1039. doi:10.1080/00343404.2011.607806
Maskell P, Bathelt H, Malmberg A (2006) Building global knowledge pipelines: the role of temporary clusters. Eur Plan Stud 14(8):997–1013
Mason C, Brown R (2014) Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. Final Report to OECD, Paris
Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Sage
Mole KF, Mole M (2010) Entrepreneurship as the structuration of individual and opportunity: a response using a critical realist perspective: comment on Sarason, Dean and Dillard. J Bus Ventur 25(2):230–237
Moore JF (1993) Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard Bus Rev 71(3):75–83
Morgan K (2004) The exaggerated death of geography: learning, proximity and territorial innovation systems. J Econ Geogr 4(1):3–21
O’Connor A (2013) A conceptual framework for entrepreneurship education policy: meeting government and economic purposes. J Bus Ventur 28(4):546–563
Paetzold A, Smith M, Warren PH, Maltby L (2011) Environmental impact propagated by cross-system subsidy: chronic stream pollution controls riparian spider populations. Ecology 92(9):1711–1716
Patton MQ (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE Publications, inc
Pearce JL, Venier LA (2006) The use of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and spiders (Araneae) as bioindicators of sustainable forest management: a review. Ecol Ind 6(4):780–793
Portes A, Sensenbrenner J (1993) Embeddedness and immigration: notes on the social determinants of economic action. Am J Sociol 98(6):1320–1350
Rainio J, Niemelä J (2003) Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as bioindicators. Biodivers Conserv 12(3):487–506
Ram M, Jones T (2008) Ethnic-minority businesses in the UK: a review of research and policy developments. Environ Plann Gov Policy 26(2):352
Ram M, Jones T, Edwards P, Kiselinchev A, Muchenje L, Woldesenbet K (2013) Engaging with super-diversity: new migrant businesses and the research–policy nexus. Int Small Bus J 31(4):337–356. doi:10.1177/0266242611429979
Rusinovic K (2008a) Moving between markets? Immigrant entrepreneurs in different markets. Int J Entrepreneurial Behav Res 14(6):440–454. doi:10.1108/13552550810910997
Rusinovic K (2008b) Transnational embeddedness: transnational activities and networks among first-and second-generation immigrant entrepreneurs in the Netherlands. J Ethnic and Migr Stud 34(3):431–451
Ryan L (2011) Migrants’ social networks and weak ties: accessing resources and constructing relationships post-migration. The Sociol Rev 59(4):707–724. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2011.02030.x
Sarason Y, Dean T, Dillard JF (2006) Entrepreneurship as the nexus of individual and opportunity: a structuration view. J Bus Ventur 21(3):286–305. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.02.007
Sepulveda L, Syrett S, Lyon F (2011) Population superdiversity and new migrant enterprise: the case of London. Entrepreneurship & Reg Dev 23(7–8):469–497. doi:10.1080/08985620903420211
Shane S, Venkataraman S (2000) The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. The Acad Manage Rev 25(1):217–226. doi:10.2307/259271
Sharma DD, Blomstermo A (2003) The internationalization process of born globals: a network view. Int Bus Rev 12(6):739–753
Smallbone D, Kitching J, Athayde R (2010) Ethnic diversity, entrepreneurship and competitiveness in a global city. Int Small Bus J 28(2):174–190. doi:10.1177/0266242609355856
Smallbone D, Ram M, Deakins D, Baldock R (2003) Access to finance by ethnic minority businesses in the UK. Int Small Bus J 21(3):291–314
Smallbone D, Welter F (2006) Conceptualising entrepreneurship in a transition context. Int J Entrepreneurship and Small Bus 3(2):190–206. doi:10.1504/IJESB.2006.008928
Sonn JW, Storper M (2008) The increasing importance of geographical proximity in knowledge production: an analysis of US patent citations, 1975–1997. Environ Plann A 40:1020–1039
Spigel B (2015) The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Pract, Early view [online] doi:10.1111/etap.12167
Stam E (2014) The Dutch entrepreneurial ecosystem. Available at SSRN 2473475
Stam E (2015) Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: a sympathetic critique. Eur Plan Stud 23(9):1759–1769. doi:10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484
Stangler D, Bell-Masterson J (2015) Measuring an entrepreneurial ecosystem. Kauffman Foundation Research Series on City, Metro, and Regional Entrepreneurship 1–16
Storper M (1995) The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later the region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies. Eur Urban and Reg Stud 2(3):191–221
Storper M, Venables AJ (2004) Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy. J Econ Geogr 4(4):351–370
Szerb L, Trumbull WN (2015) Entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystem in the V4 countries: the global entrepreneurship index perspective
Teixeira C (2001) Community resources and opportunities in ethnic economies: a case study of Portuguese and black entrepreneurs in Toronto. Urban Stud 38(11):2055–2078. doi:10.1080/00420980120080934
Thomas LD, Autio E (2013) The fifth facet: the ecosystem as an organizational field. Innovation and Entrepreneurship Group Working Papers, pp 1–40
Ulhøi JP (2005) The social dimensions of entrepreneurship. Technovation 25(8):939–946. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2004.02.003
Waldinger R (2005) Networks and niches: the continuing significance of ethnic connections. In: Loury G, Modood T, Teles S (eds) Ethnicity, social mobility, and public policy: comparing the USA and UK. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 342–362
Welch C, Piekkari R (2006) Crossing language boundaries: qualitative interviewing in international business. Manage Int Rev 46(4):417–437
Welter F (2011) Contextualizing entrepreneurship—conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Pract 35(1):165–184. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00427.x
Welter F, Smallbone D (2006) Exploring the role of trust in entrepreneurial activity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Pract 30(4):465–475. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00130.x
Welter F, Smallbone D (2011) Institutional perspectives on entrepreneurial behavior in challenging environments. J Small Bus Manage 49(1):107–125
Wilson KL, Portes A (1980) Immigrant enclaves: an analysis of the labor market experiences of Cubans in Miami. Am J Sociol 86(2):295–319
Wood GA, Parr JB (2005) Transaction Costs, Agglomeration Economies, and Industrial Location*. Growth and Change 36(1):1–15
Zahra SA (2007) Contextualizing theory building in entrepreneurship research. J Bus Ventur 22(3):443–452
Zahra SA, Wright M, Abdelgawad SG (2014) Contextualization and the advancement of entrepreneurship research. Int Small Bus J 32(5):477–500. doi:10.1177/0266242613519807
Zhou M (2004) Revisiting ethnic entrepreneurship: convergencies, controversies, and conceptual advancements1. Int Migrat Rev 38(3):1040–1074. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00228.x
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lassalle, P., Johnston, A. (2018). Where Are the Spiders? Proximities and Access to the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: The Case of Polish Migrant Entrepreneurs in Glasgow. In: O'Connor, A., Stam, E., Sussan, F., Audretsch, D. (eds) Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. International Studies in Entrepreneurship, vol 38. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63531-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63531-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63530-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63531-6
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)