Skip to main content

Where Are the Spiders? Proximities and Access to the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: The Case of Polish Migrant Entrepreneurs in Glasgow

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Entrepreneurial Ecosystems

Abstract

Entrepreneurship research is increasingly taking into account external factors in order to provide context for the conditions under which new firms are created. Thus, the entrepreneur is increasingly recognized as a constituent part of the ecosystems in which they operate. In addition, a strong and vibrant ecosystem should be host to diversity—the presence of migrant entrepreneurs is a sign of this diversity, contributing to the ecosystem at the city level. This chapter focusses on a particular group of entrepreneurs, Polish migrant entrepreneurs based in the city of Glasgow, UK, and provides details of exploratory research that examines the influence of the entrepreneurial ecosystem on their new venture creation process. In order to examine which external factors are of importance developing vibrant ecosystems, and to draw attention to the role of proximities in facilitating their use by Polish migrant entrepreneurs, this chapter synthesizes the current entrepreneurial ecosystem literature with that discussing opportunity structure and proximity. The results suggest that both geographic and cultural proximity are important factors in accessing market and resources within the local migrant community. However, it also appears that despite positive effects in the start-up phase, the high level of proximity displayed between entrepreneurs and their market base can constrain future business growth potential—leading to a lack of diversity and suggesting a lack of local diversity within the community based sub-ecosystem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    But they did not start up in all inner city areas, such as Govan or Ibrox, with high numbers of Polish migrants..

  2. 2.

    Business Gateway is a publicly funded business support institution in Scotland. Along with other services it provides advice and training for new businesses..

References

  • Ács ZJ, Autio E, Szerb L (2014) National systems of entrepreneurship: measurement issues and policy implications. Res Policy 43(3):476–494. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal R, Audretsch D, Sarkar M (2007) The process of creative construction: knowledge spillovers, entrepreneurship, and economic growth. Strateg Entrepreneurship J 1(3–4):263–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguiléra A, Lethiais V, Rallet A (2012) Spatial and non-spatial proximities in inter-firm relations: an empirical analysis. Industry and Innovation 19(3):187–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich HE, Waldinger R (1990) Ethnicity and entrepreneurship. Annu Rev Sociol 111–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Bathelt H, Glückler J (2003) Toward a relational economic geography. J Econ Geogr 3(2):117–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bathelt H, Malmberg A, Maskell P (2004) Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Prog Hum Geogr 28(1):31–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol WJ (1993) Formal entrepreneurship theory in economics: existence and bounds. J Bus Ventur 8(3):197–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boschma R (2005) Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Reg Stud 39(1):61–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke A, FitzRoy F, Nolan M (2002) Self-employment wealth and job creation: the roles of gender, non-pecuniary motivation and entrepreneurial ability. Small Bus Econ 19(3):255–270. doi:10.1023/A:1019698607772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavusgil ST, Knight G (2015) The born global firm: an entrepreneurial and capabilities perspective on early and rapid internationalization. J Int Bus Stud 46(1):3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cope J (2005) Researching entrepreneurship through phenomenological inquiry philosophical and methodological issues. Int Small Bus J 23(2):163–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coviello NE (2006) The network dynamics of international new ventures. J Int Bus Stud 37(5):713–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan R, David PA, Foray D (2000) The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness. Ind Corp Change 9(2):211–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crick D, Chaudhry S, Batstone S (2001) An investigation into the overseas expansion of small Asian-owned UK firms. Small Bus Econ 16(2):75–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crozier M, Friedberg E (1977) L’acteur et le système: les contraintes de l’action collective. [The actor and the system: the constraints of collective action]. Paris: Éditions du Seuil

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakins D, Ishaq M, Smallbone D, Whittam G, Wyper J (2007) Ethnic minority businesses in Scotland and the role of social capital. Int Small Bus J 25(3):307–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drori I, Honig B, Wright M (2009) Transnational entrepreneurship: an emergent field of study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 33(5):1001–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):532–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Acad Manag J 50(1):25–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelen E (2001) ‘Breaking in’ and ‘breaking out’: a Weberian approach to entrepreneurial opportunities. J Ethn Migr Stud 27(2):203–223. doi:10.1080/13691830020041570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelen E (2006) Towards an explanation of the performance differences of Turks in the Netherlands and Germany: the case for a comparative political economy of integration. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 97(1):69–79. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9663.2006.00497.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley D, O’Connor AJ (2013) Social capital and the networking practices of indigenous entrepreneurs. J Small Bus Manage 51(2):276–296. doi:10.1111/jsbm.12017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garud R, Gehman J, Giuliani AP (2014) Contextualizing entrepreneurial innovation: a narrative perspective. Res Policy 43(7):1177–1188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geertz C (1973) The interpretation of cultures: selected essays, vol 5019. Basic books

    Google Scholar 

  • Gertler MS (1995) “Being there”: proximity, organization, and culture in the development and adoption of advanced manufacturing technologies. Econ Geogr 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Gertler MS (2003) Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being (there). J Econ Geogr 3(1):75–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasgow City Council (2012) Population and households by ethnicity in glasgow estimates of changes 2001–2010 for community planning partnership areas and neighbourhoods

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am J Sociol 481–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 1360–1380

    Google Scholar 

  • Håkanson L (2005) Epistemic communities and cluster dynamics: on the role of knowledge in industrial districts. Industry and Innovation 12(4):433–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjerm M (2004) Immigrant entrepreneurship in the swedish welfare state. Sociology 38(4):739–756. doi:10.1177/0038038504045862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (2009) Accession monitoring report. UK Border Agency, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Howells JR (2002) Tacit knowledge, innovation and economic geography. Urban Stud 39(5–6):871–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isenberg D (2010) How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Bus Rev 88(6):40–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Isenberg D (2011) The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. Presentation at the Institute of International and European Affairs

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston A, Prokop D, Crone M, Masango S, Lassalle P (2016) Assessing the characteristics, determinants and spatial variations of internationalised new ventures in the UK. Enterprise Research Council

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones T, Barrett G, McEvoy D (2000) Market potential as a decisive influence on the performance of ethnic minority business. In: Immigrant businesses: the economic, political and social environment, pp 37–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones T, Ram M (2010) Review article: ethnic variations on the small firm labour process. Int Small Bus J 28(2):163–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones T, Ram M, Edwards P, Kiselinchev A, Muchenje L (2014) Mixed embeddedness and new migrant enterprise in the UK. Entrepreneurship & Reg Dev 26(5–6):500–520. doi:10.1080/08985626.2014.950697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly B, Ashe S (2014) Local dynamics of diversity: evidence from the 2011 Census

    Google Scholar 

  • Klag M, Langley A (2013) Approaching the conceptual leap in qualitative research. Int J Manage Rev 15(2):149–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein PG (2008) Opportunity discovery, entrepreneurial action, and economic organization. Strateg Entrepreneurship J 2(3):175–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kloosterman R, Rath J (2001) Immigrant entrepreneurs in advanced economies: mixed embeddedness further explored. J Ethnic and Migr Stud 27(2):189–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kloosterman RC (2010) Matching opportunities with resources: a framework for analysing (migrant) entrepreneurship from a mixed embeddedness perspective. Entrepreneurship & Reg Dev 22(1):25–45. doi:10.1080/08985620903220488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagendijk A, Lorentzen A (2007) Proximity, knowledge and innovation in peripheral regions. On the intersection between geographical and organizational proximity. Eur Plan Stud 15(4):457–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leitch CM, Hill FM, Harrison RT (2010) The philosophy and practice of interpretivist research in entrepreneurship: quality, validation, and trust. Organ Res Methods 13(1):67–84. doi:10.1177/1094428109339839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Light I, Dana L-P (2013) Boundaries of social capital in entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Pract 37(3):603–624. doi:10.1111/etap.12016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malecki EJ (2011) Regional social capital: why it matters. Reg Stud 46(8):1023–1039. doi:10.1080/00343404.2011.607806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maskell P, Bathelt H, Malmberg A (2006) Building global knowledge pipelines: the role of temporary clusters. Eur Plan Stud 14(8):997–1013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason C, Brown R (2014) Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. Final Report to OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Mole KF, Mole M (2010) Entrepreneurship as the structuration of individual and opportunity: a response using a critical realist perspective: comment on Sarason, Dean and Dillard. J Bus Ventur 25(2):230–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore JF (1993) Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard Bus Rev 71(3):75–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan K (2004) The exaggerated death of geography: learning, proximity and territorial innovation systems. J Econ Geogr 4(1):3–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor A (2013) A conceptual framework for entrepreneurship education policy: meeting government and economic purposes. J Bus Ventur 28(4):546–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paetzold A, Smith M, Warren PH, Maltby L (2011) Environmental impact propagated by cross-system subsidy: chronic stream pollution controls riparian spider populations. Ecology 92(9):1711–1716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton MQ (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE Publications, inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce JL, Venier LA (2006) The use of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and spiders (Araneae) as bioindicators of sustainable forest management: a review. Ecol Ind 6(4):780–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes A, Sensenbrenner J (1993) Embeddedness and immigration: notes on the social determinants of economic action. Am J Sociol 98(6):1320–1350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rainio J, Niemelä J (2003) Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as bioindicators. Biodivers Conserv 12(3):487–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ram M, Jones T (2008) Ethnic-minority businesses in the UK: a review of research and policy developments. Environ Plann Gov Policy 26(2):352

    Google Scholar 

  • Ram M, Jones T, Edwards P, Kiselinchev A, Muchenje L, Woldesenbet K (2013) Engaging with super-diversity: new migrant businesses and the research–policy nexus. Int Small Bus J 31(4):337–356. doi:10.1177/0266242611429979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusinovic K (2008a) Moving between markets? Immigrant entrepreneurs in different markets. Int J Entrepreneurial Behav Res 14(6):440–454. doi:10.1108/13552550810910997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusinovic K (2008b) Transnational embeddedness: transnational activities and networks among first-and second-generation immigrant entrepreneurs in the Netherlands. J Ethnic and Migr Stud 34(3):431–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan L (2011) Migrants’ social networks and weak ties: accessing resources and constructing relationships post-migration. The Sociol Rev 59(4):707–724. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2011.02030.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarason Y, Dean T, Dillard JF (2006) Entrepreneurship as the nexus of individual and opportunity: a structuration view. J Bus Ventur 21(3):286–305. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sepulveda L, Syrett S, Lyon F (2011) Population superdiversity and new migrant enterprise: the case of London. Entrepreneurship & Reg Dev 23(7–8):469–497. doi:10.1080/08985620903420211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane S, Venkataraman S (2000) The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. The Acad Manage Rev 25(1):217–226. doi:10.2307/259271

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma DD, Blomstermo A (2003) The internationalization process of born globals: a network view. Int Bus Rev 12(6):739–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smallbone D, Kitching J, Athayde R (2010) Ethnic diversity, entrepreneurship and competitiveness in a global city. Int Small Bus J 28(2):174–190. doi:10.1177/0266242609355856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smallbone D, Ram M, Deakins D, Baldock R (2003) Access to finance by ethnic minority businesses in the UK. Int Small Bus J 21(3):291–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smallbone D, Welter F (2006) Conceptualising entrepreneurship in a transition context. Int J Entrepreneurship and Small Bus 3(2):190–206. doi:10.1504/IJESB.2006.008928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonn JW, Storper M (2008) The increasing importance of geographical proximity in knowledge production: an analysis of US patent citations, 1975–1997. Environ Plann A 40:1020–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spigel B (2015) The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Pract, Early view [online] doi:10.1111/etap.12167

  • Stam E (2014) The Dutch entrepreneurial ecosystem. Available at SSRN 2473475

    Google Scholar 

  • Stam E (2015) Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: a sympathetic critique. Eur Plan Stud 23(9):1759–1769. doi:10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stangler D, Bell-Masterson J (2015) Measuring an entrepreneurial ecosystem. Kauffman Foundation Research Series on City, Metro, and Regional Entrepreneurship 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Storper M (1995) The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later the region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies. Eur Urban and Reg Stud 2(3):191–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storper M, Venables AJ (2004) Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy. J Econ Geogr 4(4):351–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szerb L, Trumbull WN (2015) Entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystem in the V4 countries: the global entrepreneurship index perspective

    Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira C (2001) Community resources and opportunities in ethnic economies: a case study of Portuguese and black entrepreneurs in Toronto. Urban Stud 38(11):2055–2078. doi:10.1080/00420980120080934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas LD, Autio E (2013) The fifth facet: the ecosystem as an organizational field. Innovation and Entrepreneurship Group Working Papers, pp 1–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulhøi JP (2005) The social dimensions of entrepreneurship. Technovation 25(8):939–946. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2004.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldinger R (2005) Networks and niches: the continuing significance of ethnic connections. In: Loury G, Modood T, Teles S (eds) Ethnicity, social mobility, and public policy: comparing the USA and UK. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 342–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch C, Piekkari R (2006) Crossing language boundaries: qualitative interviewing in international business. Manage Int Rev 46(4):417–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welter F (2011) Contextualizing entrepreneurship—conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Pract 35(1):165–184. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00427.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welter F, Smallbone D (2006) Exploring the role of trust in entrepreneurial activity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Pract 30(4):465–475. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00130.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welter F, Smallbone D (2011) Institutional perspectives on entrepreneurial behavior in challenging environments. J Small Bus Manage 49(1):107–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson KL, Portes A (1980) Immigrant enclaves: an analysis of the labor market experiences of Cubans in Miami. Am J Sociol 86(2):295–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood GA, Parr JB (2005) Transaction Costs, Agglomeration Economies, and Industrial Location*. Growth and Change 36(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra SA (2007) Contextualizing theory building in entrepreneurship research. J Bus Ventur 22(3):443–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra SA, Wright M, Abdelgawad SG (2014) Contextualization and the advancement of entrepreneurship research. Int Small Bus J 32(5):477–500. doi:10.1177/0266242613519807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou M (2004) Revisiting ethnic entrepreneurship: convergencies, controversies, and conceptual advancements1. Int Migrat Rev 38(3):1040–1074. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00228.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Lassalle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lassalle, P., Johnston, A. (2018). Where Are the Spiders? Proximities and Access to the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: The Case of Polish Migrant Entrepreneurs in Glasgow. In: O'Connor, A., Stam, E., Sussan, F., Audretsch, D. (eds) Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. International Studies in Entrepreneurship, vol 38. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63531-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics