Skip to main content

Relationships Between Gum Chewing and Stroop Test: A Pilot Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Oxygen Transport to Tissue XXXIX

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 977))

Abstract

Cognitive function tends to decrease with aging, therefore maintenance of this function in an aging society is an important issue. The role of chewing in nutrition is important. Although several studies indicate that gum chewing is thought to improve cognitive function, it remains debatable whether gum-chewing does in fact improve cognitive function. The Stroop test is a psychological tool used to measure cognition. A shorter reaction time indicates a mean higher behavioral performance and higher levels of oxy-Hb concentration. fNIRS is a powerful, non-invasive imaging technique offering many advantages, including compact size, no need for specially equipped facilities, and the potential for real-time measurement. The left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) seems to be mainly involved in the Stroop task.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the hypothesis that gum-chewing changes cerebral blood flow in the left DLPFC during the Stroop test, and also changes the reaction time. Fourteen healthy volunteers (mean age 26.9 years) participated in this study after providing written informed consent. A piece of tasteless gum weighing 1.0 g was used. Each session was designed in a block manner, i.e. 4 rests (30 s) and 3 blocks of task (30 s). A computerized Stroop test was used (including both congruent and incongruent Stroop tasks) which calculates a response time automatically. The Binominal test was used for comparisons (p < 0.05). The results show activation of the left DLPFC during the Stroop task and that gum chewing significantly increases responses/oxy-Hb concentration and significantly shortens the reaction time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Carp J, Gmeindl L, Reuter-Lorenz PA (2010) Age differences in the neural representation of working memory revealed by multi-voxel pattern analysis. Front Hum Neurosci 4:217

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Onozuka M, Watanabe K, Fujita M et al (2002) Evidence for involvement of glucocorticoid response in the hippocampal changes in aged molarless SAMP8 mice. Behav Brain Res 131:125–129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baker JR, Bezance JB, Zellaby E et al (2004) Chewing gum can produce context-dependent effects upon memory. Appetite 43:207–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tucha L, Simpson W, Evans L et al (2010) Detrimental effects of gum chewing on vigilance in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Appetite 55:679–684

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tucha L, Simpson W (2011) The role of time on task performance in modifying the effects of gum chewing on attention. Appetite 56:299–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Onyper SV, Carr TL, Farrar JS et al (2011) Cognitive advantages of chewing gum. Now you see them, now you don’t. Appetite 57:321–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hirano Y, Obata T, Kashikura K et al (2008) Effects of chewing in working memory processing. Neurosci Lett 436:189–192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Takada T, Miyamoto T (2004) A fronto-parietal network for chewing of gum: a study on human subjects with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosci Lett 360:137–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Momose I, Nishikawa J, Watanabe T et al (1997) Effect of mastication on regional cerebral blood flow in humans examined by positron-emission tomography with 15O-labelled water and magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Oral Biol 42:57–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ehlis AC, Herrmann MJ, Wagener A et al (2005) Multi-channel near-infrared spectroscopy detects specific inferior-frontal activation during incongruent Stroop trials. Biol Psychol 69:315–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hyodo K, Dan I, Suwabe K et al (2012) Acute moderate exercise enhances compensatory brain activation in older adults. Neurobiol Aging 33:2621–2632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoshi Y (2003) Functional near-infrared optical imaging: utility and limitations in human brain mapping. Psychophysiology 40:511–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jobsis FF (1977) Noninvasive, infrared monitoring of cerebral and myocardial oxygen sufficiency and circulatory parameters. Science 198:1264–1267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoshi Y, Kobayashi N, Tamura M (2001) Interpretation of near-infrared spectroscopy signals: a study with a newly developed perfused rat brain model. J Appl Physiol 90:1657–1662

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shibusawa M, Takeda T, Nakajima K et al (2009) Functional near-infrared spectroscopy study on primary motor and sensory cortex response to clenching. Neurosci Lett 449:98–102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tanida M, Sakatani K, Takano R et al (2004) Relation between asymmetry of prefrontal cortex activities and the autonomic nervous system during a mental arithmetic task: near infrared spectroscopy study. Neurosci Lett 369:69–74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Leon-Carrion J, Damas-Lopez J, Martin-Rodriguez JF et al (2008) The hemodynamics of cognitive control: the level of concentration of oxygenated hemoglobin in the superior prefrontal cortex varies as a function of performance in a modified Stroop task. Behav Brain Res 193:248–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yamada T, Umeyama S, Matsuda K (2012) Separation of fNIRS signals into functional and systemic components based on differences in hemodynamic modalities. PLoS One 7:e50271

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Stephens R, Tunney RJ (2004) Role of glucose in chewing gum-related facilitation of cognitive function. Appetite 43:211–213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Brehmer Y, Rieckmann A, Bellander M et al (2011) Neural correlates of training-related working-memory gains in old age. NeuroImage 58:1110–1120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Klingberg T (2010) Training and plasticity of working memory. Trends Cogn Sci 14:317–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Backman L, Nyberg L (2013) Dopamine and training-related working-memory improvement. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 37:2209–2219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Erbay FM, Aydın N, Satı-Kırkan T (2013) Chewing gum may be an effective complementary therapy in patients with mild to moderate depression. Appetite 65:31–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Narita N, Kamiya K, Yamamura K et al (2009) Chewing-related prefrontal cortex activation while wearing partial denture prosthesis: pilot study. J Prosthodont Res 53:126–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hosoi T, Morokuma M, Shibuya N et al (2011) Influence of denture treatment on brain function activity. JpnDent Sci Rev 47:56–66

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was partly supported by the Japan Science and Technology Agency, under the Strategic Promotion of Innovative Research and Development Program, and a Grant-in-Aid from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Sciences and Technology of Japan (23300247, 25463025, and 25463024).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Kawakami .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kawakami, Y. et al. (2017). Relationships Between Gum Chewing and Stroop Test: A Pilot Study. In: Halpern, H., LaManna, J., Harrison, D., Epel, B. (eds) Oxygen Transport to Tissue XXXIX. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 977. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55231-6_30

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics