Skip to main content

Cultural Heritage in Times of Economic Crisis

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology
  • 162 Accesses

State of Knowledge and Current Debates

Applied archaeological practice, as a means of investigating and protecting archaeological sites, landscapes, and material, is a young profession that emerged across the world during the twentieth century. As a practice that has become increasingly linked to land-use change and development expenditure, it has been impacted upon by all of the crises that the global economy has gone through in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries.

The Great Depression of the 1930s led to the first examples of archaeological practice being affected by an economic crisis. In the United States, the recovery plans of President Roosevelt’s New Deal involved federal investment in capital projects. This included the Tennessee Valley Authority’s dam-building program where extensive archaeological excavations were funded ahead of dam construction and subsequent reservoir flooding (Jameson 2004).

Subsequently, since the early 1970s, there have been four international...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aitchison, K. 2009a. Archaeology and the global financial crisis. Antiquity 83 (319). http://antiquity.ac.uk/projgall/Aitchison319/.

  • Aitchison, K. 2009b. After the “gold rush”: Global archaeology in 2009. World Archaeology 41 (4): 659–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aitchison, K. 2010. United Kingdom archaeology in economic crisis. In Archaeology and the global economic crisis: Multiple impacts, possible solutions, ed. N. Schlanger and K. Aitchison, 25–29. Tervuren: Culture Lab Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitchison, K. 2011. The economic crisis and the coming second wave – How the economic situation will affect archaeological practice in universities and government. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 26 (1): 79–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altschul, J.H. 2010. The effect of the global recession on cultural resource management in the United States. In Archaeology and the global economic crisis: Multiple impacts, possible solutions, ed. N. Schlanger and K. Aitchison, 103–106. Tervuren: Culture Lab Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altschul, J.H., and T.C. Patterson. 2010. Trends in employment and training in American archaeology. In Voices in American archaeology, ed. W. Ashmore, D.T. Lippert, and B.J. Mills, 291–316. Washington, DC: SAA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clelow, C.W. 1973. Private enterprise and the crisis in American archaeology. In The crisis in north American archaeology, ed. A.G. Pastron, P.S. Hallinan, and C.W. Clelow, 35–52. Berkeley: Kroeber Anthropological Society Special Publication 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolukhanov, P.M. 1993. Archaeology in the ex-USSR: Post-perestroika problems. Antiquity 67 (254): 150–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engovatova, A. 2010. The impact of the economic crisis on rescue archaeology in Russia. In Archaeology and the global economic crisis: Multiple impacts, possible solutions, ed. N. Schlanger and K. Aitchison, 97–102. Tervuren: Culture Lab Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eogan, J., and E. Sullivan. 2009. Archaeology and the demise of the ‘Celtic Tiger’. The Archaeologist 72: 26–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage Council. 2011. The Archaeological profession in Ireland: a workshop on future possibilities. http://www.mooregroup.ie/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Archaeological-Profession-in-Ireland-2011.pdf

  • Howery, C. 2013. Forum: The effects of the economic crisis on archaeology in Greece. Journal of East Mediterranean Archaeology and Heritage Studies 1 (3): 228–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikawa-Smith, F. 2011. Practice of archaeology in contemporary Japan. In Comparative archaeologies: A sociological view of the science of the past, ed. L.R. Lozny, 675–706. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, J. 2004. Public archaeology in the United States. In Public archaeology, ed. N. Merriman, 21–58. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindleberger, C.P., and R.Z. Aliber. 2011. Manias, panics and crashes: A history of financial crises. 6th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kradin, N.N. 2011. A panorama of social archaeology in Russia. In Comparative archaeologies: A sociological view of the science of the past, ed. L.R. Lozny, 243–271. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lanchester, J. 2010. Whoops! Why everyone owes everyone and no one can pay. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozny, L.R. 2011. Archaeology in the age of globalization: Local meanings, global interest. In Comparative archaeologies: A sociological view of the science of the past, ed. L.R. Lozny, 21–49. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, C., and P. La Piscopia. 2008. Discovering the archaeologists of Europe. Ireland: Institute of Archaeologists of Ireland. http://www.discovering-archaeologists.eu/national_reports/DISCO_national_Ireland_Final_Web.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrony, M., and J.M. Eisenburg. 2009. The global heritage industry and the recession: Bucking the trend? Minerva 20(1): 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okamura, K. 2011. From object-centered to people-focused: Exploring a gap between archaeologists and the public in contemporary Japan. In New perspectives in global public archaeology, ed. K. Okamura and A. Matsuda, 77–86. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Okamura, K., and A. Matsuda. 2010. Archaeological heritage management in Japan. In Cultural heritage management: A global perspective, ed. P.M. Messenger and G.S. Smith, 99–110. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pagoulatos, G. 2017. Lessons for the Eurozone from Greece’s painful crisis years, Financial Times, August 7, 2017. https://www.ft.com/content/d61da8a2-7b61-11e7-ab01-a13271d1ee9c?mhq5j=e7

  • Patterson, T.C. 1999. The political economy of archaeology in the United States. Annual Review of Anthropology 28: 155–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlanger, N. 2010. Postscript: On dead canaries, Guinea-pigs and Trojan horses. In Archaeology and the global economic crisis: Multiple impacts, possible solutions, ed. N. Schlanger and K. Aitchison, 107–115. Tervuren: Culture Lab Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, H. 1986. The wainwright interview. RESCUE News 39: 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, C. 1993. Recording the archaeology of London: The development and implementation of the DUA recording system. In Practices of archaeological stratigraphy, ed. E.C. Harris, M.R. Brown III, and G.J. Brown, 23–46. London: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Young, R., and D. O’Sullivan. 1991. Archaeology in London… both ends burning? RESCUE News 52: 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zorzin, N. 2013. The political economy of Japanese archaeology: Reflective thoughts on current organisational dynamics. Japanese Journal of Archaeology 1: 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth Aitchison .

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Aitchison, K. (2018). Cultural Heritage in Times of Economic Crisis. In: Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51726-1_1177-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51726-1_1177-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51726-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51726-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference HistoryReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics