Skip to main content

Graph Structure Similarity using Spectral Graph Theory

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 693))

Abstract

In understanding an unknown network we search for metrics to determine how close an inferred network that is being analyzed, is to the truth. We develop a metric to test for similarity between an inferred network and the true network. Our method uses the eigenvalues of the adjacency matrix and of the Laplacian at each step of the network discovery to decide on the comparison to the ground truth. We consider synthetic networks and real terrorist networks for our analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aliakbary, S., Motallebi, S., Rashidian, S., Habibi, J., Movaghar, A.: Distance metric learning for complex networks: Towards size-independent comparison of network structures. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science 25(2), 023,111 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chartrand, G., Zhang, P.: A first course in graph theory. Courier Corporation (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chung, F.R.: Spectral graph theory, vol. 92. American Mathematical Soc. (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cunningham, D.: The boko haram network. [machine-readable data file]. https://sites.google.com/site/sfeverton18/research/appendix-1 (2014)

  5. Cunningham, D., Everton, S., Wilson, G., Padilla, C., Zimmerman, D.: Brokers and key players in the internationalization of the farc. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 36(6), 477–502 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davis, B., Gera, R., Lazzaro, G., Lim, B.Y., Rye, E.C.: The marginal benefit of monitor placement on networks. In: Complex Networks VII, pp. 93–104. Springer (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Frankl, P., Rödl, V.: Forbidden intersections. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 300(1), 259–286 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gera, R.: Network Discovery Visualization Project: Naval Postgraduate School network discovery visualization project. http://faculty.nps.edu/dl/networkVisualization/ (2015)

  9. Kashima, H., Inokuchi, A.: Kernels for graph classification. In: ICDM Workshop on Active Mining, vol. 2002. Citeseer (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Klir, G., Elias, D.: Architecture of systems problem solving. 2nd edn., ifsr international series on systems science and engineering, vol. 21 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Koutra, D., Vogelstein, J.T., Faloutsos, C.: Deltacon: A principled massive-graph similarity function

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mihail, M., Papadimitriou, C.: On the eigenvalue power law. In: Randomization and approximation techniques in computer science, pp. 254–262. Springer (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pržulj, N.: Biological network comparison using graphlet degree distribution. Bioinformatics 23(2), e177–e183 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Roberts, N., Everton., S.F.: Terrorist data: Noordin top terrorist network (subset). [machinereadable data file]. https://sites.google.com/site/sfeverton18/research/appendix-1 (2011)

  15. Ruth, D.M., Koyak, R.A.: Nonparametric tests for homogeneity based on non-bipartite matching. Journal of the American Statistical Association 106(496) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schmitt, K.: Fake degree discovery algorithm for lighting up networks. https://github.com/Pelonza/Graph Inference/blob/master (2015)

  17. Tong, H., Faloutsos, C., Gallagher, B., Eliassi-Rad, T.: Fast best-effort pattern matching in large attributed graphs. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pp. 737–746. ACM (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Trefethen, L.N., Bau III, D.: Numerical linear algebra, vol. 50. Siam (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wilson, R.C., Zhu, P.: A study of graph spectra for comparing graphs and trees. Pattern Recognition 41(9), 2833–2841 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zager, L.A., Verghese, G.C.: Graph similarity scoring and matching. Applied mathematics letters 21(1), 86–94 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralucca Gera .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Crawford, B., Gera, R., House, J., Knuth, T., Miller, R. (2017). Graph Structure Similarity using Spectral Graph Theory. In: Cherifi, H., Gaito, S., Quattrociocchi, W., Sala, A. (eds) Complex Networks & Their Applications V. COMPLEX NETWORKS 2016 2016. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 693. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50901-3_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50901-3_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50900-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50901-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics