Abstract
Urban spatial structure is considered to be one of the determining factors of the transport demand volume and structure. Russian cities are traditionally characterized by high levels of public transport ridership, compared to the Western cities. Thus, it can be assumed that the spatial structure of Russian cities is a perfect illustration of the Transit Oriented Development (TOD). However, the spatial structure of the majority of the Russian cities, which has been developing during the rapid urbanization in the 20th century, currently preserves and reproduces the specific extensive models peculiar to the cities in the socialist countries. The authors analyze the spatial development patterns of 13 Russian cities in order to assess the current situation and the prospects for transit oriented development in the Russian Federation. A brief history of urban spatial development during the Soviet period is provided. Fundamental differences between TOD and Soviet Style Development (SSD) and their impact on transport demand are discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Before the construction of the plant the motorization rate was less than 10 cars per 1000 residents.
- 2.
It is worth noting that the opening of “Gorkovskaya” station in the central part of Nizhny Novgorod led to a sharp increase in ridership: from around 30 to 40 million passengers per year. For the reasons discussed below, this short-term growth could not reverse the trend of an overall decrease in ridership: the following year saw the restoration of the downward trend.
- 3.
A microrayon is the main structural element of the Soviet residential areas that can be described as a collection of extremely large housing blocks without any typical block configuration.
- 4.
For Kazan, it is reasonable to use the density at 1–2 km from the city center, as the center of the city is clearly distinguishable, but the area within the radius of 1 km around the center has low density of residential buildings due to a number of reasons.
References
Bertaud A (2004). The spatial structures of Central and European cities: more European than socialist? In Tsenkova S, Nedoviü-Budiü (eds) Winds of societal change–Remaking post-communist cities. Symposium proceedings, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, June 17–19, 2004, 45–64. Available on the web: http://www.alain-bertaud.com/AB_Files/AB_Central%20European%20Spatial%20Structure_Figures_2.pdf. Accessed 31 Aug 2016
Bertaud A, Renaud B (1995) Cities without land markets: location and land use in the socialist city, Washington, D.C. The World Bank. Available on the web: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/991331468757791794/pdf/multi-page.pdf. Accessed 31 Aug 2016
Boarnet M, Crane R (1997) L.A. Story: a reality check for transit-based housing. J Am Plann Assoc 63(2):189–204
Calthorpe P (1993) The Next American metropolis: ecology, community and the American dream. Princeton Architectural Press, New York
Cervero R, Kockelman K (1997) Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design. Trans Res Part D: Trans Environ 2(3):199–219
Cervero R, Murakami J (2008) Rail + property development: A model of sustainable transit finance, University of California. Berkeley Center for Future Urban Transport: A Volvo Center of Excellence, Berkeley
Cervero R, Murakami J (2009) Rail and property development in Hong Kong: experiences and extensions. Urban Stud 46(10):2019–2043
Dubelir GD (1910) Planirovka gorodov (Urban planning). Slovo, St. Petersburg (in Russian)
Ewing R et al (2007) Growing cooler: The evidence on urban development and climate change. Urban Land Institute, Chicago. Available on the web: https://www.nrdc.org/sites/default/files/cit_07092401a.pdf. Accessed 31 Aug 2016
Ewing R, Cervero R (2001) Travel and the built environment: a synthesis. Transp Res Rec: J Transp Res Board 1780:87–114
Glazychev VL (2008) Urbanistika (Urbanistics). Evropa, Moscow (in Russian)
Hamin E, Gurran N (2009) Urban form and climate change: balancing adaptation and mitigation in the U.S. and Australia. Habitat Int 33:238–245
Handy S (2005) Smart growth and the transportation-land use connection: What does the research tell us? Int Reg Sci Rev 28(2):146–167
Institute for Mobility Research (2013) Megacity mobility culture: How cities move on in a diverse world Springer
Jones D (1981) Urban transit policy: an economic and political history Prentice Hall, New Jersey
Kenworthy J, Laube F (1999) Patterns of automobile dependence in cities: an international overview of key physical and economic dimensions with some implications for urban policy. Transp Res Part A 33(7–8):691–723
Khan-Magomedov SO (2006) Khrushhevskij utilitarizm: plyusy i minusy (Khrushchev’ utilitarity: pro et contra). Academia. Arkhitektura i stroitelstvo 4 (in Russian)
Kosareva NB et al (2015) Osnovnye tendencii zhilishhnoj e’konomiki rossijskix gorodov (main trends housing economy of the Russian cities). Gorodskie issledovaniya i praktiki. 1:33–54 (in Russian)
Levchenko YaP (1947) Planirovka gorodov. Tekhniko-ekonomicheskie pokazateli i raschety (Planning of cities. Techical and economic indicators and calculations). Izdatelstvo Akademii arkhitektury SSSR, Moscow (in Russian)
Lin J-J, Shin T-Y (2008) Does Transit-Oriented Development Affect Metro Ridership? Evidence from Taipei, Taiwan. Transp Res Rec: J Transpo Res Board 2063:149–158
Loo B et al (2010) Rail-based transit-oriented development: lessons from New York City and Hong Kong. Landscape Urban Plann 97(3):202–212
Mikhailov AYu, Golovnykh IM (2004) Sovremennye tendencii proektirovaniya i rekonstrukcii ulichno-dorozhnykh setej gorodov (modern trends in the design and reconstruction of urban street and road networks). Nauka, Novosibirsk (in Russian)
Moscow Institute for Social and Cultural Programmes (2016) http://www.miscp.ru/en/. Accessed 31 Aug 2016
Newman P, Kenworthy J (1989) Gasoline consumption and cities: a comparison of US Cities with a Global Survey. J Am Plan Assoc 55(1):24–37
Newman P, Kenworthy J (2006) Urban design to reduce automobile dependence. Opolis: An International Journal of Suburban and Metropolitan Studies, 2(1):35–52
Petrov NV et al (1988) Prostranstvenno-vremennoj analiz sistemy rasseleniya moskovskogo stolichnogo regiona (Spatio-temporal analysis of the Moscow capital region settlement system). Institut geografii RAN, Moscow (in Russian)
Polyakov AA (1953) Gorodskoe dvizhenie i planirovka ulic (urban movement and street planning). Gosudarstvennoe izdatelstvo literatury po stroitel’stvu i arkhitekture, Moscow-Leningrad (in Russian)
Polyakov AA (1967) Transport krupnogo goroda (transport of the large city). Znanie, Moscow (in Russian)
Reforma ZHKKH (2016) https://www.reformagkh.ru/ (in Russian). Accessed 31 Aug 2016
Federal State Statistics Service (2016) http://www.gks.ru/ (in Russian). Accessed 31 Aug 2016
Schiller P et al (2010) An introduction to sustainable transportation: policy. The Cromwell Press Group, Planning and Implementation, London
Trutnev EK (2011) Logika razvertyvaniya sistemy pravovogo gradoupravleniya Moskvy: chem opasno i chem polezno proshloe dlya budushhego? (The logic of the urban legal system deployment in Moscow: what from the past is dangerous and what is useful for the future?). Proekt Rossija 62:149–156 (in Russian)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Koncheva, E., Zalesskiy, N. (2016). Urban Spatial Structure as a Factor of Travel Behavior. In: Blinkin, M., Koncheva, E. (eds) Transport Systems of Russian Cities. Transportation Research, Economics and Policy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47800-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47800-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47799-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47800-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)