Skip to main content

Design of an Empirical Agent-Based Model to Explore Rural Household Food Security Within a Developing Country Context

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Social Simulation 2015

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 528))

Abstract

Food security is an unresolved issue, especially so among developing countries. Models of food security usually focus on the farming components (availability) and neglect to fully incorporate its multi-dimensional nature: including access, utilization and stability (of food). This article proposes the design of an empirical agent-based model representing Malawian smallholders, which operationalizes the FAO framework on food security at the household level. While the general structure can be customized and replicated for other contexts, the agents’ characterization is based on national survey data. Preliminary results suggest that non-agricultural workers are more food secure. However important feedbacks with the natural (ecosystem services) and the economic system (local/international market) are foreseen but not fully implemented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Farm plots used for winter cultivations primarily based on the residual moisture of areas bordering streams and rivers.

  2. 2.

    Documentation of the model procedures is available here: http://tinyurl.com/nhmx9at.

References

  1. An, L.: Modeling human decisions in coupled human and natural systems: review of agent-based models. Ecol. Model. 229, 25–36 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Balbi, S., Giupponi, C.: Agent-based modelling of socio-ecosystems: a methodology for the analysis of adaptation to climate change. Int. J. Agents Technol. Syst. 2 (4), 17–38 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. World Bank: Global Monitoring Report 2013: Rural-Urban Dynamics and the Millennium Development Goals. World Bank, Washington (2013). doi:10.1596/978-0-8213-9806-7

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Barlett, P.F.: Agricultural Decision Making: Anthropological Contributions to Rural Development. Academic, New York (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bert, F.E., Rovere, S.L., Macal, C.M., North, M.J., Podestá, G.P.: Lessons from a comprehensive validation of an agent based-model: the experience of the pampas model of Argentinean agricultural systems. Ecol. Model. 273, 284–298 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Burchi, F., De Muro, P.: From food availability to nutritional capabilities: advancing food security analysis. Food Policy 60, 10–19 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dobbie, S., Dyke, J.G., Schreckenberg, K.: Unpacking diversity: typology creation and livelihoods analysis to support food security policy in rural Southern Malawi. Food Security (in review)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dreze, J., Sen, A.K., et al.: Hunger and Public Action. Clarendon, Oxford (1991)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Dury, J., Schaller, N., Garcia, F., Reynaud, A., Bergez, J.E.: Models to support cropping plan and crop rotation decisions. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 32 (2), 567–580 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. FAO: Voluntary guidelines to support the progressive realization of the right to adequate food in the context of national food security (2005). http://www.fao.org/docrep/meeting/009/y9825e/y9825e00.htm. Accessed 11 April 2013

  11. Farmer, J.D., Foley, D.: The economy needs agent-based modelling. Nature 460 (7256), 685–686 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gigerenzer, G., Gaissmaier, W.: Heuristic decision making. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 62, 451–482 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gigerenzer, G., Goldstein, D.G.: The recognition heuristic: a decade of research. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 6 (1), 100–121 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P.M.: Fast and frugal heuristics: the adaptive toolbox. In: Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart, pp. 3–34. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grimm, V., Berger, U., Bastiansen, F., Eliassen, S., Ginot, V., Giske, J., Goss-Custard, J., Grand, T., Heinz, S.K., Huse, G., et al.: A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models. Ecol. Model. 198 (1), 115–126 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. IFAD: Republic of Malawi sustainable agriculture production programme (sapp), programme design report (2011). http://www.ifad.org/operations/projects/design/104/malawi.pdf. Accessed 11 April 2013

    Google Scholar 

  17. Le Page, C., Becu, N., Bommel, P., Bousquet, F.: Participatory agent-based simulation for renewable resource management: the role of the cormas simulation platform to nurture a community of practice. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 15 (1), 10 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Misselhorn, A., Aggarwal, P., Ericksen, P., Gregory, P., Horn-Phathanothai, L., Ingram, J., Wiebe, K.: A vision for attaining food security. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 4 (1), 7–17 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Moss, S.: Alternative approaches to the empirical validation of agent-based models. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 11 (1), 5 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Müller, B., Balbi, S., Buchmann, C.M., De Sousa, L., Dressler, G., Groeneveld, J., Klassert, C.J., Le, Q.B., Millington, J.D., Nolzen, H., et al.: Standardised and transparent model descriptions for agent-based models: current status and prospects. Environ. Model. Softw. 55, 156–163 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. NSO: Integrated household survey 2010/11 (ihs3) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rand, W., Rust, R.T.: Agent-based modeling in marketing: guidelines for rigor. Int. J. Res. Mark. 28 (3), 181–193 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sahley, C., Groelsema, B., Marchione, T., Nelson, D.: The Governance Dimensions of Food Security in Malawi, vol. 20. USAID, Washington, DC (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sen, A.: Development: which way now? Econ. J. 93 (372), 745–762 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Smith, L.C., Subandoro, A.: Measuring Food Security Using Household Expenditure Surveys, vol. 3. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  26. The Rome declaration on world food security. Popul. Dev. Rev. 22 (4), 807–809 (1996). http://www.jstor.org/stable/2137827

  27. UN: Report of the World Food Conference, Rome 5–16 November 1974. New York (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  28. van Wijk, M., Rufino, M., Enahoro, D., Parsons, D., Silvestri, S., Valdivia, R., Herrero, M.: Farm household models to analyse food security in a changing climate: a review. Glob. Food Secur. 3 (2), 77–84 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Waldherr, A., Wijermans, N.: Communicating social simulation models to sceptical minds. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 16 (4), 13 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature 393 (6684), 440–442 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wilensky, U.: NetLogo (1999). http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by an EPSRC Doctoral Training Centre grant (EP/G03690X/1). It was also inspired by an ESPA funded research project: Attaining Sustainable Services from Ecosystems (ASSETS), which aims to “explicitly quantify the linkages between ecosystem services that affect—and are affected by—food security and nutritional health for the rural poor at the forest-agricultural interface” (http://espa-assets.org/). The participatory rural appraisal (PRA) carried out by the University of Southampton and LEAD-SEA, Malawi in the Zomba and Machinga districts of Malawi (6 villages of Chilwa East and West areas) was subjectively interpreted by the authors to build the model general framework which was subsequently assessed by project experts. The authors wish to thank the advice and support of: Kate Schreckenberg, Carlos Torres Vitolas (PRA experts), Nyovani Madise, Dalitso Kafumbata, Patrick Linkongwe (local experts), and Simon Willcock, Ferdinando Villa and James Dyke (modeling experts).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samantha Dobbie .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dobbie, S., Balbi, S. (2017). Design of an Empirical Agent-Based Model to Explore Rural Household Food Security Within a Developing Country Context. In: Jager, W., Verbrugge, R., Flache, A., de Roo, G., Hoogduin, L., Hemelrijk, C. (eds) Advances in Social Simulation 2015. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 528. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47253-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47253-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47252-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47253-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics