Skip to main content

Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis Using a Two-Step Neural Network Architecture

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Semantic Web Challenges (SemWebEval 2016)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 641))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The World Wide Web holds a wealth of information in the form of unstructured texts such as customer reviews for products, events and more. By extracting and analyzing the expressed opinions in customer reviews in a fine-grained way, valuable opportunities and insights for customers and businesses can be gained.

We propose a neural network based system to address the task of Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis to compete in Task 2 of the ESWC-2016 Challenge on Semantic Sentiment Analysis. Our proposed architecture divides the task in two subtasks: aspect term extraction and aspect-specific sentiment extraction. This approach is flexible in that it allows to address each subtask independently. As a first step, a recurrent neural network is used to extract aspects from a text by framing the problem as a sequence labeling task. In a second step, a recurrent network processes each extracted aspect with respect to its context and predicts a sentiment label. The system uses pretrained semantic word embedding features which we experimentally enhance with semantic knowledge extracted from WordNet. Further features extracted from SenticNet prove to be beneficial for the extraction of sentiment labels. As the best performing system in its category, our proposed system proves to be an effective approach for Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Here, we distinguish between the terminologies of aspect category extraction and aspect term extraction: The set of possible aspect categories is predefined and rather small (e.g. Price, Battery, Accessories, Display, Portability, Camera), while aspect terms can take many shapes (e.g. “sake menu”, “wine selection” or “French Onion soup”).

  2. 2.

    Parts of a sentence that refer to an aspect of the product, event, entity, etc.

  3. 3.

    For a more convenient notation, we use words and their respective indices interchangeably.

  4. 4.

    We use the euclidean vector distance as a distance measure.

  5. 5.

    Since this GRU processes the sequence in a reversed direction, the final hidden state is the hidden state for the first word.

  6. 6.

    We exclude annotations with aspect = NULL”.

References

  1. Aprosio, A.P., Corcoglioniti, F., Dragoni, M., Rospocher, M.: Supervised opinion frames detection with RAID. In: Gandon, F., Cabrio, E., Stankovic, M., Zimmermann, A. (eds.) SemWebEval 2015. CCIS, vol. 548, pp. 251–263. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25518-7_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Cambria, E., Olsher, D., Rajagopal, D.: SenticNet 3: a common and common-sense knowledge base for cognition-driven sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1515–1521 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cho, K., Van Merriënboer, B., Gülçehre, Ç., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., Bengio, Y.: Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Doha, Qatar, pp. 1724–1734. Association for Computational Linguistics, October 2014

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chung, J.K.-C., Wu, C.-E., Tsai, R.T.-H.: Polarity detection of online reviews using sentiment concepts: NCU IISR team at ESWC-14 challenge on concept-level sentiment analysis. In: Presutti, V., et al. (eds.) SemWebEval 2014. CCIS, vol. 475, pp. 53–58. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chung, J., Gülçehre, Ç., Cho, K., Bengio, Y.: Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling. In: NIPS Deep Learning Workshop (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Collobert, R., Weston, J., Bottou, L., Karlen, M., Kavukcuoglu, K., Kuksa, P.: Natural language processing (almost) from scratch. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2493–2537 (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Dragoni, M., Tettamanzi, A.G.B., da Costa Pereira, C.: A fuzzy system for concept-level sentiment analysis. In: Presutti, V., et al. (eds.) SemWebEval 2014. CCIS, vol. 475, pp. 21–27. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Faruqui, M., Dodge, J., Jauhar, S.K., Dyer, C., Hovy, E., Smith, N.A.: Retrofitting word vectors to semantic lexicons. In: Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2015 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the ACL, pp. 1606–1615 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fellbaum, C.: WordNet and Wordnets. In: Brown, K. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, pp. 665–670. Elsevier, Oxford (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hu, M., Liu, B.: Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In: Proceedings of the Tenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD 2004), pp. 168–177. ACM, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jakob, N., Gurevych, I.: Extracting opinion targets in a single- and cross-domain setting with conditional random fields. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 1035–1045, October 2010

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kingma, D., Ba, J.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Klinger, R., Cimiano, P.: Bi-directional inter-dependencies of subjective expressions and targets and their value for a joint model. In: Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), Short Papers, vol. 2, pp. 848–854, August 2013

    Google Scholar 

  14. Klinger, R., Cimiano, P.: Joint and pipeline probabilistic models for fine-grained sentiment analysis: extracting aspects, subjective phrases and their relations. In: Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDM), pp. 937–944, December 2013

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lakkaraju, H., Socher, R., Manning, C.: Aspect specific sentiment analysis using hierarchical deep learning. In: Proceedings of the NIPS Workshop on Deep Learning and Representation Learning (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Le, Q., Mikolov, T.: Distributed representations of sentences and documents. ICML 32, 1188–1196 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Manning, C., Surdeanu, M., Bauer, J., Finkel, J., Bethard, S., McClosky, D.: The Stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit. In: Proceedings of 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, pp. 55–60 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. McAuley, J., Pandey, R., Leskovec, J.: Inferring networks of substitutable and complementary products. In: Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD 2015), pp. 785–794. ACM, New York (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. McAuley, J., Targett, C., Shi, Q., van den Hengel, A.: Image-based recommendations on styles and substitutes. In: Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 43–52. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mikolov, T., Corrado, G., Chen, K., Dean, J.: Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G.S., Dean, J.: Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 3111–3119 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pennington, J., Socher, R., Manning, C.: GloVe: global vectors for word representation. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Doha, Qatar, pp. 1532–1543. Association for Computational Linguistics (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pontiki, M., Galanis, D., Papageorgiou, H., Manandhar, S., Androutsopoulos, I.: Semeval-2015 task 12: aspect based sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, Denver, Colorado, pp. 486–495. Association for Computational Linguistics, June 2015

    Google Scholar 

  24. San Vicente, I., Saralegi, X., Agerri, R.: EliXa: a modular and flexible ABSA platform. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, Denver, Colorado, pp. 748–752. Association for Computational Linguistics, June 2015

    Google Scholar 

  25. dos Santos, C., Zadrozny, B.: Learning character-level representations for part-of-speech tagging. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1818–1826 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. dos Santos, C.N., Xiang, B., Zhou, B.: Classifying relations by ranking with convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, vol. 1, pp. 626–634 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schouten, K., Frasincar, F.: The benefit of concept-based features for sentiment analysis. In: Gandon, F., Cabrio, E., Stankovic, M., Zimmermann, A. (eds.) SemWebEval 2015. CCIS, vol. 548, pp. 223–233. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25518-7_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Schuster, M., Paliwal, K.K.: Bidirectional recurrent neural networks. IEEE Trans. Sig. Process. 45(11), 2673–2681 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sun, Y., Lin, L., Tang, D., Yang, N., Ji, Z., Wang, X.: Modeling mention, context and entity with neural networks for entity disambiguation. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 1333–1339. AAAI Press (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Titov, I., Mcdonald, R.: A joint model of text and aspect ratings for sentiment summarization. In: Proceedings of Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pp. 308–316 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tjong Kim Sang, E.F., Veenstra, J.: Representing text chunks. In: Proceedings of European Chapter of the ACL (EACL), Bergen, Norway, pp. 173–179 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Toh, Z., Wang, W.: DLIREC: aspect term extraction and term polarity classification system. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, pp. 235–240 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zeng, D., Liu, K., Lai, S., Zhou, G., Zhao, J.: Relation classification via convolutional deep neural network. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), pp. 2335–2344 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Cluster of Excellence Cognitive Interaction Technology ‘CITEC’ (EXC 277) at Bielefeld University, which is funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soufian Jebbara .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jebbara, S., Cimiano, P. (2016). Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis Using a Two-Step Neural Network Architecture. In: Sack, H., Dietze, S., Tordai, A., Lange, C. (eds) Semantic Web Challenges. SemWebEval 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 641. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46565-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46565-4_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46564-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46565-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics