Abstract
Interest in secular, mindfulness- and compassion-based contemplative programs is increasing as a growing body of research suggests that such programs enhance health and well-being. These modern secular programs, including Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR), Cognitively-Based Compassion Training (CBCT), and Sustainable Compassion Training (SCT), have been influenced by various Buddhist contemplative traditions. These programs have also been shaped by and in response to their own modern historical–cultural context and the ways in which they variously interpret and rhetorically employ the category of the secular. Yet despite these differences, MBSR, CBCT, and SCT each claim some form of universal applicability, whether in terms of identifying the universal causes of suffering, or the universally applicable method for overcoming it. This underlying assumption raises a host of challenges and reveals a bias within the field of contemplative studies to privilege theory over context. This chapter therefore will briefly consider some of the ways in which certain Buddhist contemplative frames (i.e., innatism and constructivism) and modern cultural frames (i.e., individualism, scientific reductionism, and secularization) both limit and permit different possibilities for health and healing. The aim is to draw attention to the ways in which the universal rhetoric of these programs tends to mask or negate important contextual factors that shape way in which health, healing, and suffering are conceptualized, defined, and transformed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baker, K. K. (2014). Mindfulness meditation: Do-it-yourself medicalization of every moment. Social Science and Medicine, 106, 174. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.024.
Batchelor, Stephen. (1997). Buddhism without beliefs. New York: Riverhead Books.
Brown, C. B. (2014, December 2). Mindfulness: Stealth Buddhism for mainstreaming meditation. Huffington Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/candy-gunther-brown-phd/mindfulness-stealth-buddh_b_6243036.html
Calhoun, C. (2010). Rethinking secularism. The Hedgehog Review, 35–48.
Casanova, J. (2006). Rethinking secularization: A global comparative perspective. The Hedgehog Review, 1–22.
Lama, Dalai. (2011). Beyond religion: Ethics for a whole world. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Dunne, J. (2011). Toward an understanding of nondual mindfulness. Contemporary Buddhism, 12, 71–88. doi:10.1080/14639947.2011.564820.
Germano, D. (2014). Contemplation in contexts: Tibetan Buddhist meditation across the boundaries of the humanities and sciences. Paper presented at the Mind and Life International Symposium for Contemplative Studies, Boston, Massachusetts.
Gethin, R. (1998). The foundations of Buddhism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goffman, E. (1986). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Gordon, L. N. (2015). From power to prejudice: The rise of racial individualism in midcentury America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (1994). Wherever you go, there you are: Mindfulness meditation in everyday life. New York: Hyperion.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2000). Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. New York: Bantam Dell.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2011). Some reflections on the origins of MBSR, skillful means, and the trouble with maps. Contemporary Buddhism, 12, 281–306. doi:10.1080/14639947.2011.564844.
Kleinman, A. (1998). Experience and its moral modes: Culture, human conditions, and disorder. In The tanner lectures on human values. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
Makransky, J. (1999). Historical consciousness as an offering to the transhistorical Buddha. In J. Makransky & R. Jackson (Eds.), Buddhist theology: Critical reflections by contemporary Buddhist scholars. New York: Routledge.
Makransky, J. (2011). Compassion beyond fatigue: Contemplative training for people who serve others. In J. Simmer-Brown & F. Grace (Eds.), Meditation and the classroom (pp. 85–94). New York: SUNY Press.
Makransky, J. (2012, April–June). How contemporary Buddhist practice meets the secular world in its search for a deeper grounding for service and social action. Dharma World. doi: http://www.rkworld.org/dharmaworld/dw_2012aprjunebuddhistpractice.aspx
McMahan, D. L. (2008). The making of Buddhist modernism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Monteiro, L. M., Musten, R. F., & Compson, J. (2015). Traditional and contemporary mindfulness: Finding the middle path in the tangle of concerns. Mindfulness, 6, 1–13.
Negi, L. T. (2009). Cognitively-based compassion training: A manual. Unpublished manuscript, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Ozawa-de Silva, B., & Dodson-Lavelle, B. (2011). An education of heart and mind: Practical and theoretical issues in teaching cognitively-based compassion training to children. Practical Matters, 4, 1–28.
Ozawa-de Silva, B., & Negi, L. T. (2013). Cognitively-based compassion training: Protocol and key concepts. In T. Singer & M. Bolz (Eds.), Compassion: Bridging theory and practice (pp. 416–437). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences.
Ozawa-de Silva, B. (2014). Secular ethics, embodied cognitive logics, and education. The Journal of Contemplative Inquiry, 1(1).
Purser, R. (2015). Clearing the muddled path of traditional and contemporary mindfulness: A response to Monteiro, Musten, and Compson. Mindfulness, 6, 23–45. doi:10.1007/s12671-014-0373-4.
Purser, R., & Ng, E. (2015). Corporate mindfulness is bullsh*t: Zen or no Zen, you’re working harder and being paid less. Salon. http://www.salon.com/2015/09/27/corporate_mindfulness_is_bullsht_zen_or_no_zen_youre_working_harder_and_being_paid_less/
Reddy, S., Negi, L. T., Dodson-Lavelle, B., Ozawa-de Silva, B., Pace, T. W., Cole, S. P., et al. (2013). Cognitive based compassion training: A promising prevention strategy for at-risk adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 22, 219.
Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Boston: Harvard University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lavelle, B.D. (2016). Against One Method: Contemplation in Context. In: Purser, R., Forbes, D., Burke, A. (eds) Handbook of Mindfulness. Mindfulness in Behavioral Health. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44019-4_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44019-4_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44017-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44019-4
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)