Abstract
This paper offers some reflections on key concepts to be considered when developing policies related to assistive technology provision in the light of the UN Convention. The starting point is the Position Paper issued by AAATE and EASTIN in 2012, which defines the mission of a service delivery system (SDS) as “ensuring that all people with disabilities can access appropriate assistive solutions that are able to support autonomy in their life environment”. From the organizational viewpoint, we can identify three main SDS models: the “medical model”, the “social model” and the “consumer model”. A reasonable criterion for establishing a boundary between products that require medical models and those that don’t is that of clinical risk. The more the system moves from a medical to a social or consumer model, the more should it be based on user empowerment approaches. The GATE initiative of the World Health Organization and some national policies (such as the Australian NDIS assistive technology strategy) are firmly built upon user empowerment approaches. End-users education as well as the availability of “super partes” assistive technology information (i.e. independent of commercial interest) also plays a fundamental role in user empowerment. The paper offers a quick survey of the main information systems available today worldwide, and presents the latest achievement of today’s major information resource, the European Assistive Technology Information Network.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
United Nations Organization: UN Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml (2006)
Andrich, R., Mathiassen, N.E., Hoogerwerf, E.J., Gelderblom, G.J.: Service delivery systems for assistive technology in Europe: an AAATE/EASTIN position paper. Technol. Disabil. 25(3), 127–146 (2013)
Eustat Consortium: Assistive Technology Education for End-Users: Guidelines for Trainers. European Commission, Milano (1999)
Andrich, R., Caracciolo, A.: Analysing the cost of individual assistive technology programmes. Disabil. Rehabil. Assistive Technol. 2(4), 207–234 (2007)
World Health Organization: Patient safety curriculum guide. WHO, Geneve (2011) www.who.int/patientsafety/education/curriculum/en/
ENTELIS Consortium: Towards full digital inclusion: the ENTELIS manifesto against the digital divide (2015). www.entelis.net/en/manifesto
World Health Organization: The GATE initiative (2015). www.who.int/phi/implementation/assistive_technology/phi_gate/en/
National Disability Insurance Scheme: Assistive Technology Strategy (2015). www.ndis.gov.au/about-us/information-publications-and-reports/assistive-technology-strategy
Acknowledgements
This study was partially supported by the Italian Ministry of Health (Current Research Biomedical Programme).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Andrich, R. (2016). Re-thinking Assistive Technology Service Delivery Models in the Light of the UN Convention. In: Miesenberger, K., Bühler, C., Penaz, P. (eds) Computers Helping People with Special Needs. ICCHP 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9758. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41264-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41264-1_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41263-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41264-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)