Skip to main content

Understanding the Everyday Designer in Organisations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Tackling Society's Grand Challenges with Design Science (DESRIST 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9661))

Abstract

This paper builds upon the existing concept of an everyday designer as a non-expert designer who carries out design activities using available resources in a given environment. It does so by examining the design activities undertaken by non-expert, informal, designers in organisations who make use of the formal and informal technology already in use in organisations while designing to direct, influence, change or transform the practices of people in the organisation. These people represent a cohort of designers who are given little attention in the literature on information systems, despite their central role in the formation of practice and enactment of technology in organisations. The paper describes the experiences of 18 everyday designers in an academic setting using three concepts: everyday designer in an organisation, empathy through design and experiencing an awareness gap. These concepts were constructed through the analysis of in-depth interviews with the participants. The paper concludes with a call for tool support for everyday designers in organisations to enable them to better understand the audience for whom they are designing and the role technology plays in the organisation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Callon, M.: Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen. Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Latour, B.: Reassembling the Social-An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Giddens, A.: The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  4. DeSanctis, G., Poole, M.S.: Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. 5(2), 121–147 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Suchman, L.: Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Pickering, A.: The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. University of Chicago, Chicago (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Orlikowski, W.J.: Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. In: Resources, Co-evolution and Artifacts. Springer (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., Galliers, R.D., Henfridsson, O., Newell, S., Vidgen, R.: The sociomateriality of information systems: current status, future directions. MIS Q. 38, 809–830 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leonardi, P.M.: Materiality, sociomateriality, and socio-technical systems: What do these terms mean? How are they different? Do we need them (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Orlikowski, W.J.: Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work. Organ. Stud. 28(9), 1435–1448 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sein, M.K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., Lindgren, R.: Action design research. MIS Q. 35(1), 37–56 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Haj-Bolouri, A.: The notion of users in design science research. In: 38th Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia (IRIS 38), Oulu, Finland, 9–12 August 2015

    Google Scholar 

  13. Harrison, S., Tatar, D., Sengers, P.: The three paradigms of HCI. In: Alt. Chi. Session at the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bannon, L.: From human factors to human actors: The role of psychology and human-computer interaction studies in system design. Des. Work Coop. Des. Comput Syst. (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cooper, A.: The Inmates are Running the Asylum: Why High-Tech Products Drive us Crazy and How to Restore the Sanity, vol. 261. Sams, Indianapolis (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vaishnavi, V.K., Kuechler Jr., W.: Design Science Research Methods and Patterns: Innovating Information and Communication Technology. Auerbach Publications, Philadelphia (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28(1), 75–105 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24, 45–77 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Simon, H.A.: The Sciences of the Artificial, vol. 136. MIT press, Cambridge (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Norman, D.A.: Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Manzini, E.: Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. MIT Press, Cambridge (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Reckwitz, A.: Toward a theory of social practices a development in culturalist theorizing. Eur. J. Soc. Theory 5(2), 243–263 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kuijer, L.: Implications of Social Practice Theory for Sustainable Design (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shove, E.: The Design of Everyday Life. Berg, Oxford (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bjørn, P., Østerlund, C.: Sociomateriality and design. In: Sociomaterial-Design (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kuutti, K., Bannon, L.J.: The turn to practice in HCI: towards a research agenda. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM conference CHI, pp. 3543–3552 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wulf, V., Rohde, M., Pipek, V., Stevens, G.: Engaging with practices: design case studies as a research framework in CSCW. In: CSCW 2011, pp. 505–512

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rohde, M., Stevens, G., Brödner, P., Wulf, V.: Towards a paradigmatic shift in IS: designing for social practice. In: DESRIST (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ehn, P.: Scandinavian design: on participation and skill. Particip. Des. Princ. (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cosgrave, R., Rísquez, A., Logan-Phelan, T., Farrelly, T., Costello, E., Palmer, M., McAvinia, C., Harding, N., Vaughan, N.: Usage and Uptake of Virtual Learning Environments in Ireland: Findings from a Multi Institutional Study. AISHE-J (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  31. McAvinia, C.: Investigating the adoption of a university virtual learning environment: an activity theoretic analysis. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Dublin, Dublin (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  32. O’Rourke, K.C., Rooney, P., Boylan, F.: What’s the use of a VLE? Ir. J. Acad. Pract. 4(1), 10 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Selim, H.M.: Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: confirmatory factor models. Comput. Educ. 49(2), 396–413 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Šumak, B., HeričKo, M., Pušnik, M.: A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: the role of user types and e-learning technology types. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27(6), 2067–2077 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Trowler, P.R., et al.: Academic Tribes and Territories. McGraw-Hill, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Johannesen, M., Erstad, O., Habib, L.: Virtual learning environments as sociomaterial agents in the network of teaching practice. Comput. Educ. 59, 785–792 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lechuga, V.M., Altbach, P.G.: The Changing Landscape of the Academic Profession: The Culture of Faculty at for-Profit Colleges and Universities. Routledge, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Debowski, S.: The New Academic: A Strategic Handbook: A Strategic Handbook. McGraw-Hill Education, Maidenhead (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Whitchurch, C., Gordon, G.: Academic and Professional Identities in Higher Education: The Challenges of a Diversifying Workforce. Routledge, London (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gornall, L., Cook, C., Daunton, L.: Academic Working Lives: Experience Practice and Change. Bloomsbury Academic, London (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Musselin, C.: The Transformation of Academic Work: Facts and Analysis. Research and Occasional Paper Series: CSHE. 4.07. Center for Studies in Higher Education (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Charmaz, K.: Constructing Grounded Theory, 2nd edn. SAGE, Thousand Oaks (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ralph, N., Birks, M., Chapman, Y.: The methodological dynamism of grounded theory. Int. J. Qual. Methods 14(4), 1–6 (2015). 1609406915611576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Transaction Publishers, Chicago (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hammersley, M.: Ethnography: Principles in Practice (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Goldkuhl, G., Cronholm, S.: Adding theoretical grounding to grounded theory: toward multi-grounded theory. Int. J. Qual. Methods 9(2), 187–205 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Thornberg, R.: Informed grounded theory. Scand. J. Educ. Res. 56, 243–259 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Urquhart, C., Lehmann, H., Myers, M.D.: Putting the ‘theory’ back into grounded theory: guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems. Inf. Syst. J. 20, 357–381 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Matavire, R., Brown, I.: Profiling grounded theory approaches in information systems research†. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 22(1), 119–129 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Klein, H.K., Myers, M.D.: A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Q. 23, 67–93 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Orlikowski, W.J.: CASE tools as organizational change: investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MIS Q. 17, 309–340 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Carroll, J.M.: Making Use: Scenario-Based Design of Human-Computer Interactions (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ciarán O’Leary .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

O’Leary, C., Mtenzi, F., McAvinia, C. (2016). Understanding the Everyday Designer in Organisations. In: Parsons, J., Tuunanen, T., Venable, J., Donnellan, B., Helfert, M., Kenneally, J. (eds) Tackling Society's Grand Challenges with Design Science. DESRIST 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9661. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39294-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39294-3_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39293-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39294-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics