Abstract
The field of toxicity testing for non-pharmaceutical chemicals is in flux with multiple initiatives in North America and the EU to move away from animal testing to mode-of-action based in vitro assays. In this arena, there are still obstacles to overcome, such as developing appropriate cellular assays, creating pathway-based dose-response models and refining in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) tools. Overall, it is necessary to provide assurances that these new approaches are adequately protective of human and ecological health. Another major challenge for individual scientists and regulatory agencies is developing a cultural willingness to shed old biases developed around animal tests and become more comfortable with mode-of-action based assays in human cells. At present, most initiatives focus on developing in vitro alternatives and assessing how well these alternative methods reproduce past results related to predicting organism level toxicity in intact animals. The path forward requires looking beyond benchmarking against high dose animal studies. We need to develop targeted cellular assays, new cell biology-based extrapolation models for assessing regions of safety for chemical exposures in human populations, and mode-of-action-based approaches which are constructed on an understanding of human biology. Furthermore, it is essential that assay developers have the flexibility to ‘validate’ against the most appropriate mode-of-action data rather than against apical endpoints in high dose animal studies. This chapter demonstrates the principles of fit-for-purpose assay development using pathway-targeted case studies. The projects include p53-mdm2-mediated DNA-repair, estrogen receptor-mediated cell proliferation and PPARα receptor-mediated liver responses.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abot A, Fontaine C, Raymond-Letron I, Flouriot G, Adlanmerini M, Buscato M, Otto C, Berges H, Laurell H, Gourdy P, Lenfant F, Arnal JF (2013) The AF-1 activation function of estrogen receptor alpha is necessary and sufficient for uterine epithelial cell proliferation in vivo. Endocrinology 154:2222–2233
Adeleye Y, Andersen M, Clewell R, Davies M, Dent M, Edwards S, Fowler P, Malcomber S, Nicol B, Scott A, Scott S, Sun B, Westmoreland C, White A, Zhang Q, Carmichael PL (2015) Implementing toxicity testing in the 21st century (TT21C): making safety decisions using toxicity pathways, and progress in a prototype risk assessment. Toxicology 332:102–111. doi:10.1016/j.tox.2014.02.007
Al Rashid ST, Dellaire G, Cuddihy A, Jalali F, Vaid M, Coackley C, Folkard M, Xu Y, Chen BP, Chen DJ, Lilge L, Prise KM, Bazett Jones DP, Bristow RG (2005) Evidence for the direct binding of phosphorylated p53 to sites of DNA breaks in vivo. Cancer Res 65:10810–10821
Andersen ME, Krewski D (2010) The vision of toxicity testing in the 21st century: moving from discussion to action. Toxicol Sci 117:17–24
Andersen ME, Birnbaum LS, Barton HA, Eklund CR (1997) Regional hepatic CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 induction with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin evaluated with a multicompartment geometric model of hepatic zonation. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 144:145–155
Andersen ME, Clewell HJ, Carmichael PL, Boekelheide K (2011) Can case study approaches speed implementation of the NRC report: "toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy?". ALTEX 28:175–182
Andersen ME, Preston RJ, Maier A, Willis AM, Patterson J (2014) Dose-response approaches for nuclear receptor-mediated modes of action for liver carcinogenicity: results of a workshop. Crit Rev Toxicol 44:50–63
Arias-Lopez C, Lazaro-Trueba I, Kerr P, Lord CJ, Dexter T, Iravani M, Ashworth A, Silva A (2006) p53 modulates homologous recombination by transcriptional regulation of the RAD51 gene. EMBO Rep 7:219–224
Attene-Ramos MS, Huang R, Michael S, Witt KL, Richard A, Tice RR, Simeonov A, Austin CP, Xia M (2015) Profiling of the Tox21 chemical collection for mitochondrial function to identify compounds that acutely decrease mitochondrial membrane potential. Environ Health Perspect 123:49–56
Barak Y, Juven T, Haffner R, Oren M (1993) mdm2 expression is induced by wild type p53 activity. EMBO J 12:461–468
Bars RG, Mitchell AM, Wolf CR, Elcombe CR (1989) Induction of cytochrome P-450 in cultured rat hepatocytes. The heterogeneous localization of specific isoenzymes using immunocytochemistry. Biochem J 262:151–158
Batchelor E, Loewer A, Mock C, Lahav G (2011) Stimulus-dependent dynamics of p53 in single cells. Mol Syst Biol 7:488
Bhalla US, Ram PT, Iyengar R (2002) MAP kinase phosphatase as a locus of flexibility in a mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling network. Science 297:1018–1023
Bhattacharya S, Zhang Q, Carmichael PL, Boekelheide K, Andersen ME (2011) Toxicity testing in the 21 century: defining new risk assessment approaches based on perturbation of intracellular toxicity pathways. PLoS One 6:e20887
Boekelheide K, Andersen ME (2010) A mechanistic redefinition of adverse effects—a key step in the toxicity testing paradigm shift. ALTEX 27:243–252
Chen J, Sadowski I (2005) Identification of the mismatch repair genes PMS2 and MLH1 as p53 target genes by using serial analysis of binding elements. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:4813–4818
Clewell HJ, Tan YM, Campbell JL, Andersen ME (2008) Quantitative interpretation of human biomonitoring data. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 231:122–133
Clewell RA, Sun B, Adeleye Y, Carmichael P, Efremenko A, McMullen PD, Pendse S, Trask OJ, White A, Andersen ME (2014) Profiling dose-dependent activation of p53-mediated signaling pathways by chemicals with distinct mechanisms of DNA damage. Toxicol Sci 142:56–73
Clewell RA, Miller ME, Alyea R, Andersen ME (2015a) Developing fit-for-pupose assays for estrogenic responses in uterine cells. Toxicol. Sci
Clewell RA and Andersen ME (2016) Approaches for characterizing threshold dose-response relationships for DNA-damage pathways involved in carcinogenicity in vivo and micronuclei formation in vitro, Mutagenesis, 31, 333–340
Collins FS, Gray GM, Bucher JR (2008) Toxicology. Transforming environmental health protection. Science 319:906–907
Corton JC, Cunningham ML, Hummer BT, Lau C, Meek B, Peters JM, Popp JA, Rhomberg L, Seed J, Klaunig JE (2014) Mode of action framework analysis for receptor-mediated toxicity: the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha) as a case study. Crit Rev Toxicol 44:1–49
Elcombe CR, Peffer RC, Wolf DC, Bailey J, Bars R, Bell D, Cattley RC, Ferguson SS, Geter D, Goetz A, Goodman JI, Hester S, Jacobs A, Omiecinski CJ, Schoeny R, Xie W, Lake BG (2014) Mode of action and human relevance analysis for nuclear receptor-mediated liver toxicity: a case study with phenobarbital as a model constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) activator. Crit Rev Toxicol 44:64–82
el-Deiry WS, Tokino T, Velculescu VE, Levy DB, Parsons R, Trent JM, Lin D, Mercer WE, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B (1993) WAF1, a potential mediator of p53 tumor suppression. Cell 75:817–825
Filardo EJ, Quinn JA, Bland KI, Frackelton AR Jr (2000) Estrogen-induced activation of Erk-1 and Erk-2 requires the G protein-coupled receptor homolog, GPR30, and occurs via trans-activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor through release of HB-EGF. Mol Endocrinol 14:1649–1660
Hall JM, McDonnell DP (1999) The estrogen receptor beta-isoform (ERbeta) of the human estrogen receptor modulates ERalpha transcriptional activity and is a key regulator of the cellular response to estrogens and antiestrogens. Endocrinology 140:5566–5578
Harper JW, Adami GR, Wei N, Keyomarsi K, Elledge SJ (1993) The p21 Cdk-interacting protein Cip1 is a potent inhibitor of G1 cyclin-dependent kinases. Cell 75:805–816
He YY, Cai B, Yang YX, Liu XL, Wan XP (2009) Estrogenic G protein-coupled receptor 30 signaling is involved in regulation of endometrial carcinoma by promoting proliferation, invasion potential, and interleukin-6 secretion via the MEK/ERK mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Cancer Sci 100:1051–1061
Ignatov T, Eggemann H, Semczuk A, Smith B, Bischoff J, Roessner A, Costa SD, Kalinski T, Ignatov A (2010) Role of GPR30 in endometrial pathology after tamoxifen for breast cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203(595):e599–516
Johnson SM, Maleki-Dizaji M, Styles JA, White IN (2007) Ishikawa cells exhibit differential gene expression profiles in response to oestradiol or 4-hydroxytamoxifen. Endocr Relat Cancer 14:337–350
Judson RS, Houck KA, Kavlock RJ, Knudsen TB, Martin MT, Mortensen HM, Reif DM, Rotroff DM, Shah I, Richard AM, Dix DJ (2010) In vitro screening of environmental chemicals for targeted testing prioritization: the ToxCast project. Environ Health Perspect 118:485–492
Judson RS, Kavlock RJ, Setzer RW, Hubal EA, Martin MT, Knudsen TB, Houck KA, Thomas RS, Wetmore BA, Dix DJ (2011) Estimating toxicity-related biological pathway altering doses for high-throughput chemical risk assessment. Chem Res Toxicol 24:451–462
Kavlock R, Chandler K, Houck K, Hunter S, Judson R, Kleinstreuer N, Knudsen T, Martin M, Padilla S, Reif D, Richard A, Rotroff D, Sipes N, Dix D (2012) Update on EPA’s ToxCast program: providing high throughput decision support tools for chemical risk management. Chem Res Toxicol 25:1287–1302
Klaunig JE, Babich MA, Baetcke KP, Cook JC, Corton JC, David RM, DeLuca JG, Lai DY, McKee RH, Peters JM, Roberts RA, Fenner-Crisp PA (2003) PPARalpha agonist-induced rodent tumors: modes of action and human relevance. Crit Rev Toxicol 33:655–780
Kleinstreuer NC, Judson RS, Reif DM, Sipes NS, Singh AV, Chandler KJ, Dewoskin R, Dix DJ, Kavlock RJ, Knudsen TB (2011) Environmental impact on vascular development predicted by high-throughput screening. Environ Health Perspect 119:1596–1603
Klinge CM, Riggs KA, Wickramasinghe NS, Emberts CG, McConda DB, Barry PN, Magnusen JE (2010) Estrogen receptor alpha 46 is reduced in tamoxifen resistant breast cancer cells and re-expression inhibits cell proliferation and estrogen receptor alpha 66-regulated target gene transcription. Mol Cell Endocrinol 323:268–276
Krewski D, Acosta D Jr, Andersen M, Anderson H, Bailar JC III, Boekelheide K, Brent R, Charnley G, Cheung VG, Green S Jr, Kelsey KT, Kerkvliet NI, Li AA, McCray L, Meyer O, Patterson RD, Pennie W, Scala RA, Solomon GM, Stephens M, Yager J, Zeise L (2010) Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev 13:51–138
Krewski D, Westphal M, Al-Zoughool M, Croteau MC, Andersen ME (2011) New directions in toxicity testing. Annu Rev Public Health 32:161–178
Lahav G, Rosenfeld N, Sigal A, Geva-Zatorsky N, Levine AJ, Elowitz MB, Alon U (2004) Dynamics of the p53-Mdm2 feedback loop in individual cells. Nat Genet 36:147–150
Lehman AJ, Fitzhugh OG (1954) 100-fold margin of safety. Association Food Drug Office U.S.Q. Bulletin 18:33–35
Lin AH, Li RW, Ho EY, Leung GP, Leung SW, Vanhoutte PM, Man RY (2013) Differential ligand binding affinities of human estrogen receptor-alpha isoforms. PLoS One 8:e63199
Louis M, Becskei A (2002) Binary and graded responses in gene networks. Sci STKE 2002(143):pe33
Martin MT, Dix DJ, Judson RS, Kavlock RJ, Reif DM, Richard AM, Rotroff DM, Romanov S, Medvedev A, Poltoratskaya N, Gambarian M, Moeser M, Makarov SS, Houck KA (2010) Impact of environmental chemicals on key transcription regulators and correlation to toxicity end points within EPA’s ToxCast program. Chem Res Toxicol 23:578–590
Martin MT, Knudsen TB, Reif DM, Houck KA, Judson RS, Kavlock RJ, Dix DJ (2011) Predictive model of rat reproductive toxicity from ToxCast high throughput screening. Biol Reprod 85:327–339
McMullen PD, Bhattacharya S, Woods CG, Sun B, Yarborough K, Ross SM, Miller ME, McBride MT, LeCluyse EL, Clewell RA, Andersen ME (2014) A map of the PPARalpha transcription regulatory network for primary human hepatocytes. Chem Biol Interact 209:14–24
McMullen PD, Andersen ME, Pendse S, Bhattacharya S, Clewell RA, LeCluyse EL (2015) Identifying qualitative differences in PPARa signaling networks in human and rat hepatocytes. Toxicol Sci Rev. Identifying qualitative differences in PPARa signaling networks in human and rat hepatocytes – significance for risk assessment
Mettetal JT, Muzzey D, Gomez-Uribe C, van Oudenaarden A (2008) The frequency dependence of osmo-adaptation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 319:482–484
Miyashita T, Reed JC (1995) Tumor suppressor p53 is a direct transcriptional activator of the human bax gene. Cell 80:293–299
Murk AJ, Rijntjes E, Blaauboer BJ, Clewell R, Crofton KM, Dingemans MM, Furlow JD, Kavlock R, Kohrle J, Opitz R, Traas T, Visser TJ, Xia M, Gutleb AC (2013) Mechanism-based testing strategy using in vitro approaches for identification of thyroid hormone disrupting chemicals. Toxicol In Vitro 27:1320–1346
Neumaier T, Swenson J, Pham C, Polyzos A, Lo AT, Yang P, Dyball J, Asaithamby A, Chen DJ, Bissell MJ, Thalhammer S, Costes SV (2012) Evidence for formation of DNA repair centers and dose-response nonlinearity in human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:443–448
NRC (1983) Risk assessment in the federal government: managing the process. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
NRC (2007) Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
Oda K, Arakawa H, Tanaka T, Matsuda K, Tanikawa C, Mori T, Nishimori H, Tamai K, Tokino T, Nakamura Y, Taya Y (2000) p53AIP1, a potential mediator of p53-dependent apoptosis, and its regulation by Ser-46-phosphorylated p53. Cell 102:849–862
Odom DT, Zizlsperger N, Gordon DB, Bell GW, Rinaldi NJ, Murray HL, Volkert TL, Schreiber J, Rolfe PA, Gifford DK, Fraenkel E, Bell GI, Young RA (2004) Control of pancreas and liver gene expression by HNF transcription factors. Science 303:1378–1381
OECD. (2007), Test No. 440: Uterotrophic Bioassay in Rodents: A short-term screening test for oestrogenic properties, OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4, OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264067417-en
Penot G, Le Peron C, Merot Y, Grimaud-Fanouillere E, Ferriere F, Boujrad N, Kah O, Saligaut C, Ducouret B, Metivier R, Flouriot G (2005) The human estrogen receptor-alpha isoform hERalpha46 antagonizes the proliferative influence of hERalpha66 in MCF7 breast cancer cells. Endocrinology 146:5474–5484
Purvis JE, Karhohs KW, Mock C, Batchelor E, Loewer A, Lahav G (2012) p53 dynamics control cell fate. Science 336:1440–1444
Rosen MB, Abbott BD, Wolf DC, Corton JC, Wood CR, Schmid JE, Das KP, Zehr RD, Blair ET, Lau C (2008a) Gene profiling in the livers of wild-type and PPARalpha-null mice exposed to perfluorooctanoic acid. Toxicol Pathol 36:592–607
Rosen MB, Lee JS, Ren H, Vallanat B, Liu J, Waalkes MP, Abbott BD, Lau C, Corton JC (2008b) Toxicogenomic dissection of the perfluorooctanoic acid transcript profile in mouse liver: evidence for the involvement of nuclear receptors PPAR alpha and CAR. Toxicol Sci 103:46–56
Rosen MB, Schmid JR, Corton JC, Zehr RD, Das KP, Abbott BD, Lau C (2010) Gene expression profiling in wildtype and PPARalpha-null mice exposed to perfluorooctane sulfonate reveals PPARalpha-independent effects. PPAR Res 794739:1–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/794739
Rotroff DM, Wetmore BA, Dix DJ, Ferguson SS, Clewell HJ, Houck KA, Lecluyse EL, Andersen ME, Judson RS, Smith CM, Sochaski MA, Kavlock RJ, Boellmann F, Martin MT, Reif DM, Wambaugh JF, Thomas RS (2010) Incorporating human dosimetry and exposure into high-throughput in vitro toxicity screening. Toxicol Sci 117:348–358
Rotroff DM, Dix DJ, Houck KA, Knudsen TB, Martin MT, McLaurin KW, Reif DM, Crofton KM, Singh AV, Xia M, Huang R, Judson RS (2013) Using in vitro high throughput screening assays to identify potential endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Environ Health Perspect 121:7–14
Rotroff DM, Martin MT, Dix DJ, Filer DL, Houck KA, Knudsen TB, Sipes NS, Reif DM, Xia M, Huang R, Judson RS (2014) Predictive endocrine testing in the 21st century using in vitro assays of estrogen receptor signaling responses. Environ Sci Technol 48:8706–8716
Russell WMS, Burch RL (1959) The principles of humane experimental technique. Methuen, London
Sarangapani R, Teeguarden J, Plotzke KP, McKim JM Jr, Andersen ME (2002) Dose-response modeling of cytochrome p450 induction in rats by octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane. Toxicol Sci 67:159–172
Simmons SO, Fan CY, Ramabhadran R (2009) Cellular stress response pathway system as a sentinel ensemble in toxicological screening. Toxicol Sci 111:202–225
Sipes NS, Martin MT, Reif DM, Kleinstreuer NC, Judson RS, Singh AV, Chandler KJ, Dix DJ, Kavlock RJ, Knudsen TB (2011) Predictive models of prenatal developmental toxicity from ToxCast high-throughput screening data. Toxicol Sci 124:109–127
Sipes NS, Martin MT, Kothiya P, Reif DM, Judson RS, Richard AM, Houck KA, Dix DJ, Kavlock RJ, Knudsen TB (2013) Profiling 976 ToxCast chemicals across 331 enzymatic and receptor signaling assays. Chem Res Toxicol 26:878–895
Thomas RS, Black M, Li L, Healy E, Chu TM, Bao W, Andersen M, Wolfinger R (2012) A comprehensive statistical analysis of predicting in vivo hazard using high-throughput in vitro screening. Toxicol Sci 128(2):398–417
Thornborrow EC, Patel S, Mastropietro AE, Schwartzfarb EM, Manfredi JJ (2002) A conserved intronic response element mediates direct p53-dependent transcriptional activation of both the human and murine bax genes. Oncogene 21:990–999
van der Meer DL, Degenhardt T, Vaisanen S, de Groot PJ, Heinaniemi M, de Vries SC, Muller M, Carlberg C, Kersten S (2010) Profiling of promoter occupancy by PPARalpha in human hepatoma cells via ChIP-chip analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 38:2839–2850
Wang Z, Zhang X, Shen P, Loggie BW, Chang Y, Deuel TF (2006) A variant of estrogen receptor-{alpha}, hER-{alpha}36: transduction of estrogen- and antiestrogen-dependent membrane-initiated mitogenic signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:9063–9068
Wax PM (1995) Elixirs, diluents, and the passage of the 1938 Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. Ann Intern Med 122:456–461
Wetmore BA, Wambaugh JF, Ferguson SS, Sochaski MA, Rotroff DM, Freeman K, Clewell HJ III, Dix DJ, Andersen ME, Houck KA, Allen B, Judson RS, Singh R, Kavlock RJ, Richard AM, Thomas RS (2012) Integration of dosimetry, exposure, and high-throughput screening data in chemical toxicity assessment. Toxicol Sci 125:157–174
Zhang Q, Bhattacharya S, Andersen ME (2013) Ultrasensitive response motifs: basic amplifiers in molecular signalling networks. Open Biol 3:130031
Zhang Q, Bhattacharya S, Conolly RB, Clewell HJ III, Kaminski NE, Andersen ME (2014) Molecular signaling network motifs provide a mechanistic basis for cellular threshold responses. Environ Health Perspect 122(12):1261–1270
Zhang Q, Bhattacharya S, Pi J, Clewell RA, Carmichael PL, Andersen ME (2015) Adaptive postranslational control in cellular stress response pathways and its relationship to toxicity testing and safety assessment. Toxicol Sci 147(2):302–316
Acknowledgments
The ACC-LRI (Long Range Research Initiative of the American Chemistry Council), Dow Chemical, Unilever, the ExxonMobil Foundation, Dow Corning have supported method development and data generation needed in pursuing case study approaches to bringing the TT21C vision to life more quickly. Unilever has supported the p53-case study activities at The Hamner.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Clewell, R.A., McMullen, P.D., Adeleye, Y., Carmichael, P.L., Andersen, M.E. (2016). Pathway Based Toxicology and Fit-for-Purpose Assays. In: Eskes, C., Whelan, M. (eds) Validation of Alternative Methods for Toxicity Testing. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 856. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33826-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33826-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33824-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33826-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)