Skip to main content

Pathway Based Toxicology and Fit-for-Purpose Assays

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Validation of Alternative Methods for Toxicity Testing

Abstract

The field of toxicity testing for non-pharmaceutical chemicals is in flux with multiple initiatives in North America and the EU to move away from animal testing to mode-of-action based in vitro assays. In this arena, there are still obstacles to overcome, such as developing appropriate cellular assays, creating pathway-based dose-response models and refining in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) tools. Overall, it is necessary to provide assurances that these new approaches are adequately protective of human and ecological health. Another major challenge for individual scientists and regulatory agencies is developing a cultural willingness to shed old biases developed around animal tests and become more comfortable with mode-of-action based assays in human cells. At present, most initiatives focus on developing in vitro alternatives and assessing how well these alternative methods reproduce past results related to predicting organism level toxicity in intact animals. The path forward requires looking beyond benchmarking against high dose animal studies. We need to develop targeted cellular assays, new cell biology-based extrapolation models for assessing regions of safety for chemical exposures in human populations, and mode-of-action-based approaches which are constructed on an understanding of human biology. Furthermore, it is essential that assay developers have the flexibility to ‘validate’ against the most appropriate mode-of-action data rather than against apical endpoints in high dose animal studies. This chapter demonstrates the principles of fit-for-purpose assay development using pathway-targeted case studies. The projects include p53-mdm2-mediated DNA-repair, estrogen receptor-mediated cell proliferation and PPARα receptor-mediated liver responses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abot A, Fontaine C, Raymond-Letron I, Flouriot G, Adlanmerini M, Buscato M, Otto C, Berges H, Laurell H, Gourdy P, Lenfant F, Arnal JF (2013) The AF-1 activation function of estrogen receptor alpha is necessary and sufficient for uterine epithelial cell proliferation in vivo. Endocrinology 154:2222–2233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Adeleye Y, Andersen M, Clewell R, Davies M, Dent M, Edwards S, Fowler P, Malcomber S, Nicol B, Scott A, Scott S, Sun B, Westmoreland C, White A, Zhang Q, Carmichael PL (2015) Implementing toxicity testing in the 21st century (TT21C): making safety decisions using toxicity pathways, and progress in a prototype risk assessment. Toxicology 332:102–111. doi:10.1016/j.tox.2014.02.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Al Rashid ST, Dellaire G, Cuddihy A, Jalali F, Vaid M, Coackley C, Folkard M, Xu Y, Chen BP, Chen DJ, Lilge L, Prise KM, Bazett Jones DP, Bristow RG (2005) Evidence for the direct binding of phosphorylated p53 to sites of DNA breaks in vivo. Cancer Res 65:10810–10821

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen ME, Krewski D (2010) The vision of toxicity testing in the 21st century: moving from discussion to action. Toxicol Sci 117:17–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen ME, Birnbaum LS, Barton HA, Eklund CR (1997) Regional hepatic CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 induction with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin evaluated with a multicompartment geometric model of hepatic zonation. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 144:145–155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen ME, Clewell HJ, Carmichael PL, Boekelheide K (2011) Can case study approaches speed implementation of the NRC report: "toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy?". ALTEX 28:175–182

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen ME, Preston RJ, Maier A, Willis AM, Patterson J (2014) Dose-response approaches for nuclear receptor-mediated modes of action for liver carcinogenicity: results of a workshop. Crit Rev Toxicol 44:50–63

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arias-Lopez C, Lazaro-Trueba I, Kerr P, Lord CJ, Dexter T, Iravani M, Ashworth A, Silva A (2006) p53 modulates homologous recombination by transcriptional regulation of the RAD51 gene. EMBO Rep 7:219–224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Attene-Ramos MS, Huang R, Michael S, Witt KL, Richard A, Tice RR, Simeonov A, Austin CP, Xia M (2015) Profiling of the Tox21 chemical collection for mitochondrial function to identify compounds that acutely decrease mitochondrial membrane potential. Environ Health Perspect 123:49–56

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barak Y, Juven T, Haffner R, Oren M (1993) mdm2 expression is induced by wild type p53 activity. EMBO J 12:461–468

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bars RG, Mitchell AM, Wolf CR, Elcombe CR (1989) Induction of cytochrome P-450 in cultured rat hepatocytes. The heterogeneous localization of specific isoenzymes using immunocytochemistry. Biochem J 262:151–158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Batchelor E, Loewer A, Mock C, Lahav G (2011) Stimulus-dependent dynamics of p53 in single cells. Mol Syst Biol 7:488

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bhalla US, Ram PT, Iyengar R (2002) MAP kinase phosphatase as a locus of flexibility in a mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling network. Science 297:1018–1023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya S, Zhang Q, Carmichael PL, Boekelheide K, Andersen ME (2011) Toxicity testing in the 21 century: defining new risk assessment approaches based on perturbation of intracellular toxicity pathways. PLoS One 6:e20887

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Boekelheide K, Andersen ME (2010) A mechanistic redefinition of adverse effects—a key step in the toxicity testing paradigm shift. ALTEX 27:243–252

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Sadowski I (2005) Identification of the mismatch repair genes PMS2 and MLH1 as p53 target genes by using serial analysis of binding elements. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:4813–4818

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Clewell HJ, Tan YM, Campbell JL, Andersen ME (2008) Quantitative interpretation of human biomonitoring data. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 231:122–133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clewell RA, Sun B, Adeleye Y, Carmichael P, Efremenko A, McMullen PD, Pendse S, Trask OJ, White A, Andersen ME (2014) Profiling dose-dependent activation of p53-mediated signaling pathways by chemicals with distinct mechanisms of DNA damage. Toxicol Sci 142:56–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Clewell RA, Miller ME, Alyea R, Andersen ME (2015a) Developing fit-for-pupose assays for estrogenic responses in uterine cells. Toxicol. Sci

    Google Scholar 

  • Clewell RA and Andersen ME (2016) Approaches for characterizing threshold dose-response relationships for DNA-damage pathways involved in carcinogenicity in vivo and micronuclei formation in vitro, Mutagenesis, 31, 333–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins FS, Gray GM, Bucher JR (2008) Toxicology. Transforming environmental health protection. Science 319:906–907

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Corton JC, Cunningham ML, Hummer BT, Lau C, Meek B, Peters JM, Popp JA, Rhomberg L, Seed J, Klaunig JE (2014) Mode of action framework analysis for receptor-mediated toxicity: the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha) as a case study. Crit Rev Toxicol 44:1–49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elcombe CR, Peffer RC, Wolf DC, Bailey J, Bars R, Bell D, Cattley RC, Ferguson SS, Geter D, Goetz A, Goodman JI, Hester S, Jacobs A, Omiecinski CJ, Schoeny R, Xie W, Lake BG (2014) Mode of action and human relevance analysis for nuclear receptor-mediated liver toxicity: a case study with phenobarbital as a model constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) activator. Crit Rev Toxicol 44:64–82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • el-Deiry WS, Tokino T, Velculescu VE, Levy DB, Parsons R, Trent JM, Lin D, Mercer WE, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B (1993) WAF1, a potential mediator of p53 tumor suppression. Cell 75:817–825

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Filardo EJ, Quinn JA, Bland KI, Frackelton AR Jr (2000) Estrogen-induced activation of Erk-1 and Erk-2 requires the G protein-coupled receptor homolog, GPR30, and occurs via trans-activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor through release of HB-EGF. Mol Endocrinol 14:1649–1660

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hall JM, McDonnell DP (1999) The estrogen receptor beta-isoform (ERbeta) of the human estrogen receptor modulates ERalpha transcriptional activity and is a key regulator of the cellular response to estrogens and antiestrogens. Endocrinology 140:5566–5578

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harper JW, Adami GR, Wei N, Keyomarsi K, Elledge SJ (1993) The p21 Cdk-interacting protein Cip1 is a potent inhibitor of G1 cyclin-dependent kinases. Cell 75:805–816

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • He YY, Cai B, Yang YX, Liu XL, Wan XP (2009) Estrogenic G protein-coupled receptor 30 signaling is involved in regulation of endometrial carcinoma by promoting proliferation, invasion potential, and interleukin-6 secretion via the MEK/ERK mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Cancer Sci 100:1051–1061

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ignatov T, Eggemann H, Semczuk A, Smith B, Bischoff J, Roessner A, Costa SD, Kalinski T, Ignatov A (2010) Role of GPR30 in endometrial pathology after tamoxifen for breast cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203(595):e599–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson SM, Maleki-Dizaji M, Styles JA, White IN (2007) Ishikawa cells exhibit differential gene expression profiles in response to oestradiol or 4-hydroxytamoxifen. Endocr Relat Cancer 14:337–350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Judson RS, Houck KA, Kavlock RJ, Knudsen TB, Martin MT, Mortensen HM, Reif DM, Rotroff DM, Shah I, Richard AM, Dix DJ (2010) In vitro screening of environmental chemicals for targeted testing prioritization: the ToxCast project. Environ Health Perspect 118:485–492

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Judson RS, Kavlock RJ, Setzer RW, Hubal EA, Martin MT, Knudsen TB, Houck KA, Thomas RS, Wetmore BA, Dix DJ (2011) Estimating toxicity-related biological pathway altering doses for high-throughput chemical risk assessment. Chem Res Toxicol 24:451–462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kavlock R, Chandler K, Houck K, Hunter S, Judson R, Kleinstreuer N, Knudsen T, Martin M, Padilla S, Reif D, Richard A, Rotroff D, Sipes N, Dix D (2012) Update on EPA’s ToxCast program: providing high throughput decision support tools for chemical risk management. Chem Res Toxicol 25:1287–1302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klaunig JE, Babich MA, Baetcke KP, Cook JC, Corton JC, David RM, DeLuca JG, Lai DY, McKee RH, Peters JM, Roberts RA, Fenner-Crisp PA (2003) PPARalpha agonist-induced rodent tumors: modes of action and human relevance. Crit Rev Toxicol 33:655–780

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinstreuer NC, Judson RS, Reif DM, Sipes NS, Singh AV, Chandler KJ, Dewoskin R, Dix DJ, Kavlock RJ, Knudsen TB (2011) Environmental impact on vascular development predicted by high-throughput screening. Environ Health Perspect 119:1596–1603

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Klinge CM, Riggs KA, Wickramasinghe NS, Emberts CG, McConda DB, Barry PN, Magnusen JE (2010) Estrogen receptor alpha 46 is reduced in tamoxifen resistant breast cancer cells and re-expression inhibits cell proliferation and estrogen receptor alpha 66-regulated target gene transcription. Mol Cell Endocrinol 323:268–276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Krewski D, Acosta D Jr, Andersen M, Anderson H, Bailar JC III, Boekelheide K, Brent R, Charnley G, Cheung VG, Green S Jr, Kelsey KT, Kerkvliet NI, Li AA, McCray L, Meyer O, Patterson RD, Pennie W, Scala RA, Solomon GM, Stephens M, Yager J, Zeise L (2010) Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev 13:51–138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Krewski D, Westphal M, Al-Zoughool M, Croteau MC, Andersen ME (2011) New directions in toxicity testing. Annu Rev Public Health 32:161–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lahav G, Rosenfeld N, Sigal A, Geva-Zatorsky N, Levine AJ, Elowitz MB, Alon U (2004) Dynamics of the p53-Mdm2 feedback loop in individual cells. Nat Genet 36:147–150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman AJ, Fitzhugh OG (1954) 100-fold margin of safety. Association Food Drug Office U.S.Q. Bulletin 18:33–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin AH, Li RW, Ho EY, Leung GP, Leung SW, Vanhoutte PM, Man RY (2013) Differential ligand binding affinities of human estrogen receptor-alpha isoforms. PLoS One 8:e63199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Louis M, Becskei A (2002) Binary and graded responses in gene networks. Sci STKE 2002(143):pe33

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin MT, Dix DJ, Judson RS, Kavlock RJ, Reif DM, Richard AM, Rotroff DM, Romanov S, Medvedev A, Poltoratskaya N, Gambarian M, Moeser M, Makarov SS, Houck KA (2010) Impact of environmental chemicals on key transcription regulators and correlation to toxicity end points within EPA’s ToxCast program. Chem Res Toxicol 23:578–590

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin MT, Knudsen TB, Reif DM, Houck KA, Judson RS, Kavlock RJ, Dix DJ (2011) Predictive model of rat reproductive toxicity from ToxCast high throughput screening. Biol Reprod 85:327–339

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McMullen PD, Bhattacharya S, Woods CG, Sun B, Yarborough K, Ross SM, Miller ME, McBride MT, LeCluyse EL, Clewell RA, Andersen ME (2014) A map of the PPARalpha transcription regulatory network for primary human hepatocytes. Chem Biol Interact 209:14–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McMullen PD, Andersen ME, Pendse S, Bhattacharya S, Clewell RA, LeCluyse EL (2015) Identifying qualitative differences in PPARa signaling networks in human and rat hepatocytes. Toxicol Sci Rev. Identifying qualitative differences in PPARa signaling networks in human and rat hepatocytes – significance for risk assessment

    Google Scholar 

  • Mettetal JT, Muzzey D, Gomez-Uribe C, van Oudenaarden A (2008) The frequency dependence of osmo-adaptation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 319:482–484

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Miyashita T, Reed JC (1995) Tumor suppressor p53 is a direct transcriptional activator of the human bax gene. Cell 80:293–299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murk AJ, Rijntjes E, Blaauboer BJ, Clewell R, Crofton KM, Dingemans MM, Furlow JD, Kavlock R, Kohrle J, Opitz R, Traas T, Visser TJ, Xia M, Gutleb AC (2013) Mechanism-based testing strategy using in vitro approaches for identification of thyroid hormone disrupting chemicals. Toxicol In Vitro 27:1320–1346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neumaier T, Swenson J, Pham C, Polyzos A, Lo AT, Yang P, Dyball J, Asaithamby A, Chen DJ, Bissell MJ, Thalhammer S, Costes SV (2012) Evidence for formation of DNA repair centers and dose-response nonlinearity in human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:443–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • NRC (1983) Risk assessment in the federal government: managing the process. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC (2007) Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Oda K, Arakawa H, Tanaka T, Matsuda K, Tanikawa C, Mori T, Nishimori H, Tamai K, Tokino T, Nakamura Y, Taya Y (2000) p53AIP1, a potential mediator of p53-dependent apoptosis, and its regulation by Ser-46-phosphorylated p53. Cell 102:849–862

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Odom DT, Zizlsperger N, Gordon DB, Bell GW, Rinaldi NJ, Murray HL, Volkert TL, Schreiber J, Rolfe PA, Gifford DK, Fraenkel E, Bell GI, Young RA (2004) Control of pancreas and liver gene expression by HNF transcription factors. Science 303:1378–1381

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2007), Test No. 440: Uterotrophic Bioassay in Rodents: A short-term screening test for oestrogenic properties, OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4, OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264067417-en

  • Penot G, Le Peron C, Merot Y, Grimaud-Fanouillere E, Ferriere F, Boujrad N, Kah O, Saligaut C, Ducouret B, Metivier R, Flouriot G (2005) The human estrogen receptor-alpha isoform hERalpha46 antagonizes the proliferative influence of hERalpha66 in MCF7 breast cancer cells. Endocrinology 146:5474–5484

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Purvis JE, Karhohs KW, Mock C, Batchelor E, Loewer A, Lahav G (2012) p53 dynamics control cell fate. Science 336:1440–1444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen MB, Abbott BD, Wolf DC, Corton JC, Wood CR, Schmid JE, Das KP, Zehr RD, Blair ET, Lau C (2008a) Gene profiling in the livers of wild-type and PPARalpha-null mice exposed to perfluorooctanoic acid. Toxicol Pathol 36:592–607

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen MB, Lee JS, Ren H, Vallanat B, Liu J, Waalkes MP, Abbott BD, Lau C, Corton JC (2008b) Toxicogenomic dissection of the perfluorooctanoic acid transcript profile in mouse liver: evidence for the involvement of nuclear receptors PPAR alpha and CAR. Toxicol Sci 103:46–56

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen MB, Schmid JR, Corton JC, Zehr RD, Das KP, Abbott BD, Lau C (2010) Gene expression profiling in wildtype and PPARalpha-null mice exposed to perfluorooctane sulfonate reveals PPARalpha-independent effects. PPAR Res 794739:1–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/794739

  • Rotroff DM, Wetmore BA, Dix DJ, Ferguson SS, Clewell HJ, Houck KA, Lecluyse EL, Andersen ME, Judson RS, Smith CM, Sochaski MA, Kavlock RJ, Boellmann F, Martin MT, Reif DM, Wambaugh JF, Thomas RS (2010) Incorporating human dosimetry and exposure into high-throughput in vitro toxicity screening. Toxicol Sci 117:348–358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rotroff DM, Dix DJ, Houck KA, Knudsen TB, Martin MT, McLaurin KW, Reif DM, Crofton KM, Singh AV, Xia M, Huang R, Judson RS (2013) Using in vitro high throughput screening assays to identify potential endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Environ Health Perspect 121:7–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rotroff DM, Martin MT, Dix DJ, Filer DL, Houck KA, Knudsen TB, Sipes NS, Reif DM, Xia M, Huang R, Judson RS (2014) Predictive endocrine testing in the 21st century using in vitro assays of estrogen receptor signaling responses. Environ Sci Technol 48:8706–8716

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Russell WMS, Burch RL (1959) The principles of humane experimental technique. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarangapani R, Teeguarden J, Plotzke KP, McKim JM Jr, Andersen ME (2002) Dose-response modeling of cytochrome p450 induction in rats by octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane. Toxicol Sci 67:159–172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons SO, Fan CY, Ramabhadran R (2009) Cellular stress response pathway system as a sentinel ensemble in toxicological screening. Toxicol Sci 111:202–225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sipes NS, Martin MT, Reif DM, Kleinstreuer NC, Judson RS, Singh AV, Chandler KJ, Dix DJ, Kavlock RJ, Knudsen TB (2011) Predictive models of prenatal developmental toxicity from ToxCast high-throughput screening data. Toxicol Sci 124:109–127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sipes NS, Martin MT, Kothiya P, Reif DM, Judson RS, Richard AM, Houck KA, Dix DJ, Kavlock RJ, Knudsen TB (2013) Profiling 976 ToxCast chemicals across 331 enzymatic and receptor signaling assays. Chem Res Toxicol 26:878–895

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas RS, Black M, Li L, Healy E, Chu TM, Bao W, Andersen M, Wolfinger R (2012) A comprehensive statistical analysis of predicting in vivo hazard using high-throughput in vitro screening. Toxicol Sci 128(2):398–417

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thornborrow EC, Patel S, Mastropietro AE, Schwartzfarb EM, Manfredi JJ (2002) A conserved intronic response element mediates direct p53-dependent transcriptional activation of both the human and murine bax genes. Oncogene 21:990–999

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van der Meer DL, Degenhardt T, Vaisanen S, de Groot PJ, Heinaniemi M, de Vries SC, Muller M, Carlberg C, Kersten S (2010) Profiling of promoter occupancy by PPARalpha in human hepatoma cells via ChIP-chip analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 38:2839–2850

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Zhang X, Shen P, Loggie BW, Chang Y, Deuel TF (2006) A variant of estrogen receptor-{alpha}, hER-{alpha}36: transduction of estrogen- and antiestrogen-dependent membrane-initiated mitogenic signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:9063–9068

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wax PM (1995) Elixirs, diluents, and the passage of the 1938 Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. Ann Intern Med 122:456–461

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wetmore BA, Wambaugh JF, Ferguson SS, Sochaski MA, Rotroff DM, Freeman K, Clewell HJ III, Dix DJ, Andersen ME, Houck KA, Allen B, Judson RS, Singh R, Kavlock RJ, Richard AM, Thomas RS (2012) Integration of dosimetry, exposure, and high-throughput screening data in chemical toxicity assessment. Toxicol Sci 125:157–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Bhattacharya S, Andersen ME (2013) Ultrasensitive response motifs: basic amplifiers in molecular signalling networks. Open Biol 3:130031

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Bhattacharya S, Conolly RB, Clewell HJ III, Kaminski NE, Andersen ME (2014) Molecular signaling network motifs provide a mechanistic basis for cellular threshold responses. Environ Health Perspect 122(12):1261–1270

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Bhattacharya S, Pi J, Clewell RA, Carmichael PL, Andersen ME (2015) Adaptive postranslational control in cellular stress response pathways and its relationship to toxicity testing and safety assessment. Toxicol Sci 147(2):302–316

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The ACC-LRI (Long Range Research Initiative of the American Chemistry Council), Dow Chemical, Unilever, the ExxonMobil Foundation, Dow Corning have supported method development and data generation needed in pursuing case study approaches to bringing the TT21C vision to life more quickly. Unilever has supported the p53-case study activities at The Hamner.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca A. Clewell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Clewell, R.A., McMullen, P.D., Adeleye, Y., Carmichael, P.L., Andersen, M.E. (2016). Pathway Based Toxicology and Fit-for-Purpose Assays. In: Eskes, C., Whelan, M. (eds) Validation of Alternative Methods for Toxicity Testing. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 856. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33826-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics