Skip to main content

Towards Geospatial Tangible User Interfaces: An Observational User Study Exploring Geospatial Interactions of the Novice

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Geographical Information Systems Theory, Applications and Management (GISTAM 2015)

Abstract

Tangible user interfaces (TUI) such as tangible tabletops have potential as novel and innovative learning environments for mapping applications across a wide range of geospatial learning activities. This is because they offer a more natural and intuitive class of interface to users and they are fun to use. For realising their potential as a new type of geo-technology, they must be easy and straightforward to learn and remember how to use. Furthermore, the different types of tangible object interactions should align to the mental models and cultural perceptions of different types of users. This paper reports on the results of an initial observational of a small set of novice users. Users were recorded completing six tasks whilst thinking aloud. The resulting analysis revealed how easy it was for the novice to discover the different types of geospatial tangible interactions (e.g., zoom, pan, adding layers, working with layers). Formed around the categories of (1) everyday cartographic elements and their everyday metaphors, (2) object manipulations, and (3) offline interactions we propose a set usability guidelines for geospatial tangible tables. The aim is to provide an evidence base on which to improve future iterations of the improving their usability, usefulness and increasing their potential as a learning interface.

This article is a substantially extended version of an already published conference paper, published in the conference proceedings of the GISTAM 2015 Conference [41]. Paper presented at the 1st International Conference on Geographical Information Systems Theory, Applications and Management (GISTAM 2015), Barcelona, Spain]. Substantial changes have been made for this extended version, but some parts have remained unchanged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.weastflows.eu.

References

  1. Djajadiningrat, T., Wensveen, S., Frens, J., Overbeeke, K.: Tangible products: re-dressing the balance between appearance and action. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 8(5), 294–309 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Esteves, A., Michelle S., Ian O.: Supporting offline activities on interactive surfaces. In: Proceedings of TEI 2013 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Faulkner, L.: Beyond the five-user assumption: benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing. Behav. Res. Methods Instr. Comput. 35(3), 379–383 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fernaeus, Y., Jakob, T.: Looking at the computer but doing it on land: children’ s interactions in a tangible programming space. In: McEwan, T., Gulliksen, J., Benyon, D. (eds.) People and Computers XIX — The Bigger Picture, pp. 3–18. Springer, London (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Fernaeus, Y., Tholander, J., Jonsson, M.: Towards a new set of ideals: consequences of the practice turn in tangible interaction. In: Proceedings of TEI 2008, pp. 223–230. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fischer, G.: External and sharable artefacts as sources for social creativity in communities of interest. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Roundtable Conference: Computational and Cognitive Models of Creative Design, Australia, 9–13 December 2002

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fishkin, K.: A taxonomy for and analysis of tangible interfaces. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 8(5), 347–358 (2004). doi:10.1007/s00779-004-0297-4

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fuhrmann, S., et al.: Making useful and useable geovisualization: design and evaluation issues. Exploring Geovisualization, 553–566 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goodchild, M.F.: Twenty years of progress: GIScience in 2010. J. Spat. Inf. Sci. 1, 3–20 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goodchild, M.F.: Spatial thinking and the GIS user interface. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci. 21, 3–9 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Haklay, M., Tobón, C.: Usability evaluation and PPGIS: towards a user-centred design approach. Int. J. of Geograph. Inf. Sci. 17(6), 577–592 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hornecker, E., Buur, J.: Getting a grip on tangible interaction: a framework on physical space and social interaction. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hwang, W., Salvendy, G.: Number of people required for usability evaluation: the 10±2 rule. Commun. ACM 53(5), 130–133 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ishii, H., Ullmer, B.: Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In: Proceedings of CHI 1997, 22–27 March 1997

    Google Scholar 

  15. ISO/TR 16982:2002: ISO/TR 16982:2002: “Ergonomics of human-system interaction – usability methods supporting human-centred design,” International Standards for Business, Government and Society

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jones, C.E., Haklay, M., Griffiths, S., Vaughan, L.: A less-is-more approach to geovisualisation – enhancing knowledge construction across multidisciplinary teams. Int. J. Geograph. Inf. Syst. 23(8), 1077–1093 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jones, C.E.: Practical cartography. In: Haklay, M. (ed.) Interacting with Geospatial Technologies. Wiley, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jones, C.E., Weber, P.: Towards usability engineering for online editors of volunteered geographic information: a perspective on learnability. Trans. GIS 16(4), 523–544 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Landauer, T.K., Nielsen, J.: A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. In: Interchi 1993, ACM Computer–Human Interface Special Interest Group (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Longley, P., Goodchild, M., Maguire, D., Rhind, D.: Geog. Information Systems and Science. Wiley, Chichester (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. MacEachren, A.M., Kraak, J.A.: Research challenges in geovisualization. Cartography Geograph. Inf. Sci. 28, 3–12 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. MacEachren, A.M., Cai, G., Sharma, R., Rauschert, I., Brewer, I., Bolelli, L., Wang, H.: Enabling collaborative geoinformation access and decision-making through a natural, multimodal interface. Int. J. GIS 19(3), 293–317 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  23. MacEacheren, A.M., Cia, G., Brewer, I., Chen, J.: Supporting map-based geocollaboration through natural interfaces to large screen displays. Cartographic Perspect. 54, 16–34 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Maquil, V.: Towards understanding the design space of tangible user interfaces for collaborative urban planning. Interact. Comput. (2015). doi:10.1093/iwc/iwv005

    Google Scholar 

  25. Maquil, V., De Sousa L., Leopold U., Tobias E.: A geospatial tangible user interface to support stakeholder participation in urban planning. In: Proceedings of GISTAM 2015 (2015, to be published)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Maquil, V., Ras, E.: Collaborative problem solving with objects: physical aspects of a tangible tabletop in technology-based assessment. In: COOP 2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Marsh, S.L.: Using and evaluating HCI techniques in geovisualization: applying standard and adapted methods in research and education. In: Proceedings of GIS Research UK, pp. 33–38 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Marshall, P.: Do tangible interfaces enhance learning. In: Proceedings of TEI 2007, Baton Rouge, LA, USA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Montello, D.: Spatial cognition. In: Smelser, N., Baltes, P. (eds.) International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences, pp. 14771–14775. Pergamon Press, Oxford (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Nagel, T., Maitan, M., Duval, E., Moere, A.V., Klerkx, J., Kloeckl, K., Ratti, C.: Touching transport-a case study on visualizing metropolitan public transit on interactive tabletops (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nivala, A.M., Brewster, S., Sarjakoski, T.L.: Usability evaluation of web mapping sites. Cartographic J. 45(2), 129–138 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Parsons, E.: The map of the future may not be a map! Cartographic Rev. 50(2), 182–186 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Price, S.: A representation approach to conceptualizing tangible learning environments. In: Proceedings of TEI 2008, p. 151. ACM Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  34. Roth, R.E.: Interactivity and cartography: a contemporary perspective on user interface and user experience design from geospatial professionals. Cartographica 50, 2 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Schneider, B., Jermann, P., Zufferey, G., Dillenbourg, P.: Benefits of a tangible interface for collaborative learning and interaction. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 4(2), 222–232 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Scott, S., Allavena, A., Cerar, K., Mcclelland, P., Cheung, V.: Designing and assessing a multi-user tabletop interface to support collaborative decision-making involving dynamic geospatial data. Technical report, University of Waterloo, Canada (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C.: Designing the User Interface, 4th edn. Pearson, Addison Wesley, USA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sui, D.: The wikification of GIS and its consequences: or Angelina Jolie’s new tattoo and the future of GIS. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 32, 1–5 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ullmer, B.: Emerging frameworks for tangible user interfaces. IBM Syst. J. 39, 915–931 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tversky, B., Morrison, J.B., Betrancourt, M.: Animation: can it facilitate? Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 57, 247–262 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Jones, C.E., Maquil, V.:. Twist, shift, or stack? Usability analysis of geospatial interactions on a tangible tabletop (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Fernaeus, Y., Tholander, J., Jonsson, M.: Towards a new set of ideals: consequences of the practice turn in tangible interaction. In: Proceedings of TEI 2008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Maquil, V., Ras, E.: Collaborative problem solving with objects: physical aspects of a tangible tabletop in technology-based assessment. In: Proceedings of COOP 2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been partially funded by the Interreg IVb project Weastflows and the Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST). We would like to extend our thanks to all the experiment participants who provided excellent data on which we could base this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Emma Jones .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jones, C.E., Maquil, V. (2016). Towards Geospatial Tangible User Interfaces: An Observational User Study Exploring Geospatial Interactions of the Novice. In: Grueau, C., Gustavo Rocha, J. (eds) Geographical Information Systems Theory, Applications and Management. GISTAM 2015. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 582. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29589-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29589-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29588-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29589-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics