Abstract
This contribution contains an overview of the role of the concept of human dignity in the Dutch constitutional system. The role is a very limited one, mainly due to the rather sober constitutional culture and tradition in the Netherlands. The Constitution does not contain any reference to human dignity, nor do the Netherlands have a system of constitutional review of Acts of Parliament by the judiciary. Sometimes, the idea of human dignity does play a role in legal debates in Parliament or in court decisions. In most cases, this is the result of the application of international and European human rights standards and the taking into consideration of interpretations given by bodies like the European Court of Human Rights. However, there are some eye-catching judgements in which Dutch courts have taken some extra steps in considering human dignity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Alkema EA (1984) Foreign relations in the Netherlands constitution of 1983. Netherlands International Law Review 31:307–331
Alkema EA (2012) Chapter 16, Netherlands. In: Shelton D (ed) International Law and Domestic Legal Systems: Incorporation, Transformation, and Persuasion. Oxford University Press Scholarship Online 2012, Oxford
Barkhuysen T, Van Emmerik ML, Voermans WJM (2009) De Nederlandse Grondwet geëvalueerd: anker- of verdwijnpunt? (Evaluating the constitution of the Netherlands: anchor point or point of disappearance?). Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, pp 27–46
Brems E, Vrielink J (2010) Menselijke waardigheid in de Nederlandse Grondwet? Voorstudie ten behoeve van de Staatscommissie Grondwet (Human dignity in the Dutch Constitution? A preparatory study for the Royal Commission on the Constitution). Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn. Chapters 2 and 3
Cliteur PB, Voermans WJM (2009) Preambules (preambles). Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn
College voor de Rechten van de Mens (2014) Advies inzake wetsvoorstel Algemene bepaling Grondwet (Advisory opinion on the draft general provision of the Constitution), Utrecht 15 October 2014 [online]. Available at: https://www.mensenrechten.nl/publicaties/detail/34982. Accessed 21 Jul 2016
College voor de Rechten van de Mens (2015) On 26 November 2015: College teleurgesteld over uitspraken in de Bed Bad Brood zaken (Human Rights Institute disappointed over judgments on bed, bath, bread arrangements), public statement 26 November 2015 [online]. Available at: http://www.mensenrechten.nl/berichten/college-teleurgesteld-over-uitspraken-de-bed-bad-brood-zaken. Accessed 21 Jul 2016
De Hartogh GA (2007) Schadevergoeding wegens onrechtmatig bestaan (‘wrongful life’) onvoldoende beargumenteerd (Insufficient justification for granting a wrongful-life claim). Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde 151(4):241
Kroes M, Gerbranda T (1993) Eindrapport Grondrechten evaluatie-onderzoek (final report evaluating the human rights provisions in the Dutch constitution). NJCM-Boekerij, Leiden. Chapter 1
Eindrapport van de staatscommissie van advies inzake de Grondwet en de Kieswet (Final report of the Royal Advisory Commission on the Constitution and the Electoral Law) (1971), The Hague, p 22
Rapport Staatscommissie Grondwet (Report of the Royal Commission on the Constitution) (2010), The Hague, Chapter 4, pp. 35–42
Stolker CJJM (2007) Terechte schadevergoeding wegens onrechtmatig bestaan (‘wrongful life’) (Appropriate damages due to ‘wrongful life’). Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde 151(4):240
Uzman J, Barhuysen T, Van Emmerik ML (2010) The Dutch supreme court: a reluctant positive legislator? In: van Erp J, van Vliet L (eds) Netherlands reports to the eighteenth international congress of comparative law – Washington 2010. Intersentia, Antwerp/Oxford/Portland, pp 423–467
Case Law
Conference of European Churches (CEC) v. The Netherlands, Complaint No. 90/2013 (European Committee on Social Rights 1 July 2014)
Goodwin v. The United Kingdom, appl. no. 28957/95 (ECtHR 11 July 2002), § 90
Jehovah’s witnesses of Moscow v. Russia, appl. no. 302/02 (ECtHR 10 June 2010), § 135
M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece, appl. no. 30696/09 (ECtHR 21 January 2011), § 253
Omega Spielhallen, C-36/02 (CJEU 14 October 2004), § 34
I. v. The United Kingdom, appl. no. 25680/94 (ECtHR 11 July 2002), § 70
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Loof, JP. (2017). Human Dignity in the Netherlands. In: Becchi, P., Mathis, K. (eds) Handbook of Human Dignity in Europe. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27830-8_30-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27830-8_30-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27830-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27830-8
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Law and CriminologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences