Abstract
Mobile learning has enabled students to be active participants in their own learning. Students now have the ability to better develop and control their learning inside and outside the teaching context. Effective mobile learning practices require educators to develop an environment that fosters and supports their student’s learning. Educators are however, still struggling with how to effectively support a learner-centred mobile learning environment.
In 2014, six New Zealand (NZ) tertiary institutions became involved in a nationwide project that aimed to explore how mobile technology could be effectively incorporated into tertiary education to provide increased inclusivity and to support innovative and transformative classroom practices. To guide the project, a framework was adopted to help support the teachers to better integrate mobile devices to facilitate learner-generated contexts. The framework adopted blends several interrelated learning frameworks interpreted within the pedagogy-andragogy-heutagogy (PAH) continuum.
This paper reports on four cases studies exploring how mobile technology was incorporated at one of the institutes involved in the wider project. These case studies explore how four lecturers have employed mobile devices to enhance students’ learning opportunities within four different computing courses. Each case study focuses on how mobile technology has been integrated and includes a discussion on the benefits and issues of the technologies encountered within each case.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Ako, A.: Learners and mobile devices (#NPF14LMD): a framework for enhanced learning and institutional change (2014). https://akoaotearoa.ac.nz/learner-mobile-devices
Behrendt, M., Franklin, T.: A review of research on school field trips and their value in education. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Edu. 9, 235–245 (2014)
Blaschke, L.M.: Heutagogy and lifelong learning: a review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 13(1), 56–71 (2012)
Canning, N., Callan, S.: Heutagogy: spirals of reflection to empower learners in higher education. Reflective Pract. 11(1), 71–82 (2010)
Crompton, H.: A historical overview of mobile learning: toward learner-centered education. In: Handbook of mobile learning, pp. 3–14 (2013)
Cochrane, T.: Secrets of mlearning failures: confronting reality. Res. Learn. Technol. 20, 123–134 (2012)
Cochrane, T., Antonczak, L., Keegan, H., Narayan, V.: Riding the wave of BYOD: developing a framework for creative pedagogies. Res. Learn. Technol. 22, 1–14 (2014)
Kolb, D.A.: Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development (1984). http://academic.regis.edu/ed205/kolb.pdf
Luckin, R., Clark, W., Garnett, F., Whitworth, A., Akass, J., Cook, J., Robertson, J.: Learner-generated contexts: a framework to support the effective use of technology for learning. In: Lee, M., McLoughlin, C., (eds.) Web 2.0-Based E-Learning: Applying Social Informatics for Tertiary Teaching, pp. 70–84. Hershey, PA: IGI Global (2010)
Scarce, R.: Field trips as short-term experiential education. Teach. Sociol. 25(3), 219 (1997). http://search.proquest.com/docview/223512647?accountid=39646
Shee, D., Wang, Y.: Multi-criteria evaluation of the web-based e-learning system: a methodology based on learner satisfaction and its applications. Computers & Education 50(3), 894–905 (2008). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131506001424
Skelton, D. (2009). Blended is still best: Review of literature and commentary on optimal learning environments. AMCIS 2009 Proceedings. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2009/615
Spencer, K.M., Coutts, T., Fagan, T., King, A.: Connections, diversity, coherence: three vignettes exploring learning with ipads in primary schools. Comput. NZ Sch.: Learn., Teach., Technol. 25(1–3), 38–55 (2013)
Sternberg, R.J., Kaufman, J.C., Pretz, J.E.: The Creativity Conundrum: A Propulsion Model of Kinds of Creative Contributions. Psychology Press, Philadelphia (2002)
Traxler, J.: Will student devices deliver innovation, inclusion, and transformation? J. Res. Cent. Edu. Technol. 6(1), 3–15 (2010). http://www.rcetj.org/index.php/rcetj/article/view/56/177
Verhaart, M., Hagen-Hall, K.: GxLearning, teaching to geographically extended classes. In: Lopez, M., Verhaart, M., (eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Conference of the Computing and Information Technology Research and Education of New Zealand Conference (Incorporating the 25th National Advisory Committee on Computing Qualifications Conference), Christchurch, New Zealand, 7–10 October, pp. 75–81 (2012)
Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mac Callum, K., Day, S., Skelton, D., Lengyl, I., Verhaart, M. (2015). A Multiple Case Study Approach Exploring Innovation, Pedagogical Transformation and Inclusion for Mobile Learning. In: Brown, T., van der Merwe, H. (eds) The Mobile Learning Voyage - From Small Ripples to Massive Open Waters. mLearn 2015. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 560. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25684-9_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25684-9_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25683-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25684-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)