Skip to main content

Reflexive Learning, Socio-cognitive Conflict and Peer-assessment to Improve the Quality of Feedbacks in Online Tests

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Design for Teaching and Learning in a Networked World (EC-TEL 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9307))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Our previous works have introduced the Tsaap-notes platform dedicated to the semi automatic generation of multiple choice questionnaire providing feedbacks: it reuses interactive questions asked by teachers during lectures, as well as the notes taken by students after the presentation of the results as feedbacks integrated into the quizzes. In this paper, we introduce a new feature which aims at increasing the number of contributions of students in order to significantly improve the quality of the feedbacks used in the resulting quizzes. This feature splits the submission of an answer into several distinct phases to harvest explanations given by students, and then applies an algorithm to filter the best contributions to be integrated as feedbacks in the tests. Our approach has been validated by a first experimentation involving master students enrolled in a computer science course.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Biggs, J., Tang, C.: Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does. McGraw-Hill Education, UK (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Black, P., Wiliam, D.: Assessment and classroom learning. Assess. Educ. 5(1), 7–74 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boud, D., Cohen, R., Sampson, J.: Peer Learning in Higher Education: Learning from and with Each Other. Routledge, New York (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Caldwell, J.E.: Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. CBE-Life Sci. Educ. 6(1), 9–20 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dochy, F., Segers, M., Sluijsmans, D.: The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Stud. High. Educ. 24(3), 331–350 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gauci, S.A., Dantas, A.M., Williams, D.A., Kemm, R.E.: Promoting student-centered active learning in lectures with a personal response system. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 33(1), 60–71 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hattie, J., Jaeger, R.: Assessment and classroom learning: a deductive approach. Assess. Educ. 5(1), 111–122 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Higgins, R.: Be more critical: rethinking assessment feedback. DYE. V, PC4000 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Miller, T.: Formative computer-based assessment in higher education: the effectiveness of feedback in supporting student learning. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 34(2), 181–192 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nicol, D., Milligan, C.: Rethinking technology-supported assessment practices in relation to the seven principles of good feedback practice. In: Innovative Assessment in Higher Education, pp. 64–77 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. QTI, I.: Question and test interoperability (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ricketts, C., Wilks, S.: Improving student performance through computer-based assessment: Insights from recent research. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 27(5), 475–479 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Scouller, K.: The influence of assessment method on students’ learning approaches: multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. High. Educ. 35(4), 453–472 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shaffer, D.M., Collura, M.J.: Evaluating the effectiveness of a personal response system in the classroom. Teach. Psychol. 36(4), 273–277 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Silvestre, F., Vidal, P., Broisin, J.: Tsaap-notes-an open micro-blogging tool for collaborative notetaking during face-to-face lectures. In: 2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), pp. 39–43. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Silvestre, F., Vidal, P., Broisin, J.: Semi automatic generation of online tests providing feedbacks based on collaborative note taking. In: 2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), IEEE (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Topping, K.: Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Rev. Educ. Res. 68(3), 249–276 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Uhari, M., Renko, M., Soini, H.: Experiences of using an interactive audience response system in lectures. BMC Med. Educ. 3(1), 12 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franck Silvestre .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Silvestre, F., Vidal, P., Broisin, J. (2015). Reflexive Learning, Socio-cognitive Conflict and Peer-assessment to Improve the Quality of Feedbacks in Online Tests. In: Conole, G., Klobučar, T., Rensing, C., Konert, J., Lavoué, E. (eds) Design for Teaching and Learning in a Networked World. EC-TEL 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9307. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24258-3_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24258-3_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24257-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24258-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics