Skip to main content

Comparing Behavior Towards Humans and Virtual Humans in a Social Dilemma

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9238))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The difference of shown social behavior towards virtual humans and real humans has been subject to much research. Many of these studies compare virtual humans (VH) that are presented as either virtual agents controlled by a computer or as avatars controlled by real humans. In this study we directly compare VHs with real humans. Participants played an economic game against a computer-controlled VH or a visible human opponent. Decisions made throughout the game were logged, additionally participants’ faces were filmed during the study and analyzed with expression recognition software. The analysis of choices showed participants are far more willing to violate social norms with VHs: they are more willing to steal and less willing to forgive. Facial expressions show trends that suggest they are treating VHs less socially. The results highlight, that even in impoverished social interactions, VHs have a long way to go before they can evoke truly human-like responses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://unity3d.com/webplayer.

  2. 2.

    http://www.emotient.com/products/#FACETVision.

References

  1. Bartlett, M., Littlewort, G., Wu, T., Movellan, J.: Computer expression recognition toolbox. In: 2008 8th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, FG 2008, pp. 1–2. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Batrinca, L., Stratou, G., Shapiro, A., Morency, L.-P., Scherer, S.: Cicero - towards a multimodal virtual audience platform for public speaking training. In: Aylett, R., Krenn, B., Pelachaud, C., Shimodaira, H. (eds.) IVA 2013. LNCS, vol. 8108, pp. 116–128. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Blascovich, J.: A theoretical model of social influence for increasing the utility of collaborative virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Collaborative Virtual Environments, pp. 25–30. ACM (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Broekens, J., Harbers, M., Brinkman, W.-P., Jonker, C.M., Van den Bosch, K., Meyer, J.-J.: Virtual reality negotiation training increases negotiation knowledge and skill. In: Nakano, Y., Neff, M., Paiva, A., Walker, M. (eds.) IVA 2012. LNCS, vol. 7502, pp. 218–230. springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. de Melo, C.M., Carnevale, P.J., Read, S.J., Gratch, J.: Reading peoples minds from emotion expressions in interdependent decision making. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 106(1), 73–88 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. de Melo, C.M., Carnevale, P., Gratch, J.: The influence of emotions in embodied agents on human decision-making. In: Allbeck, J., Badler, N., Bickmore, T., Pelachaud, C., Safonova, A. (eds.) IVA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6356, pp. 357–370. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. de Melo, C.M., Gratch, J., Carnevale, P.J.: The effect of agency on the impact of emotion expressions on people’s decision making. In: 2013 Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII), pp. 546–551. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. de Melo, C.M., Gratch, J., Carnevale, P.J.: The importance of cognition and affect for artificially intelligent decision makers. In: Twenty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fox, J., Ahn, S.J., Janssen, J.H., Yeykelis, L., Segovia, K.Y., Bailenson, J.N.: Avatars versus agents: a meta-analysis quantifying the effect of agency on social influence. In: Human Computer Interaction, pp. 1–61 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Krach, S., Hegel, F., Wrede, B., Sagerer, G., Binkofski, F., Kircher, T.: Can machines think? Interaction and perspective taking with robots investigated via FMRI. PLoS ONE 3(7), e2597 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Littlewort, G., Whitehill, J., Wu, T.-F., Butko, N., Ruvolo, P., Movellan, J., Bartlett, M.: The motion in emotion: a cert based approach to the fera emotion challenge. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition and Workshops (FG 2011), pp. 897–902. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nass, C., Moon, Y.: Machines and mindlessness: social responses to computers. J. Soc. Issues 56(1), 81–103 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nass, C., Steuer, J., Tauber, E.R.: Computers are social actors. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 72–78. ACM (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reeves, B., Nass, C.: The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places. Cambridge University Press, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Riedl, R., Mohr, P., Kenning, P., Davis, F., Heekeren, H.: Trusting humans and avatars: behavioral and neural evidence (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Van Kleef, G.A., De Dreu, C.K.W., Manstead, A.S.R.: An interpersonal approach to emotion in social decision making: the emotions as social information model. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 42, 45–96 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. von der Pütten, A.M., Krämer, N.C., Gratch, J., Kang, S.-H.: It doesn’t matter what you are! explaining social effects of agents and avatars. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(6), 1641–1650 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported in part by the AFOSR [FA9550-14-1-0364] and the US Army. The content does not necessarily reflect the position or the policy of any Government, and no official endorsement should be inferred.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rens Hoegen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hoegen, R., Stratou, G., Lucas, G.M., Gratch, J. (2015). Comparing Behavior Towards Humans and Virtual Humans in a Social Dilemma. In: Brinkman, WP., Broekens, J., Heylen, D. (eds) Intelligent Virtual Agents. IVA 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9238. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21996-7_48

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21996-7_48

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21995-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21996-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics