Skip to main content

Moody Agents: Affect and Discourse During Learning in a Serious Game

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9112))

Abstract

The current study investigated teacher emotions, student emotions, and discourse features in relation to learning in a serious game. The experiment consisted of 48 subjects participating in a 4-condition within-subjects counter-balanced pretest-interaction-posttest design. Participants interacted with a serious game teaching research methodology with natural language conversations between the human student and two artificial pedagogical agents. The discourse of the artificial pedagogical agents was manipulated to evoke student affective states. Student emotion was measured via affect grids and discourse features were measured with computational linguistics techniques. Results indicated that learner’s arousal levels impacted learning and that language use is correlated with learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Millis, K., Forsyth, C., Butler, H., Wallace, P., Graesser, A.C., Halpern, D.: Operation ARIES! a serious game for teaching scientific inquiry: serious games and edutainment applications. In: Ma, M., Oikonomou, A., Lakhmi, J. (eds.), pp.169–196. Springer-Verlag, London (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Forsyth, C.M., Graesser, A.C. Pavlik, P., Cai, Z., Butler, H., Halpern, D.F., Millis, K.: Operation ARIES! methods, mystery and mixed models: Discourse features predict affect in a serious game. J. Ed. D. Min. 5, 147–189 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. D’Mello, S., Graessar, A.C.: Emotions during learning with AutoTutor: adaptive technologies for training and education. In: Durlach, P.J., Lesgold, A. (eds.). Cambridge University Press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Conati, C., Maclaren, H.: Empirically building and evaluating a probabilistic model of user affect. User Mod. User-Ad. Inter. 19, 267–303 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Russell, J., Weiss, A., Mendelsohn, J.A.: Affect grid: A single-item scale of pleasure and arousal. J. of Pers. and Soc. Psych. 57, 493–5029 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sullins, J., Craig, S., Graesser, A.C.: Tough love: the influence of an agent’s negative affect on students’ learning. In: Dimitrova, V., Mizoguchi, R., Du Boulay, B., Graesser, A.C. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education: Building Learning Systems that Care: From Knowledge Representation to Affective Modeling, pp. 677–679. IOS Press, Am-sterdam (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Isen, A.M.: Positive affect and decision processes: some recent theoretical developments with practical implications: handbook of consumer psychology. In: Haugdevedt, C., Herr, P.M., Kardes, F.R. (eds.), pp. 273–296. Psychology Press, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Franzel, A.C., Goetz, T., Ludtke, O., Pekrun, R., Sutton, R.E.: Emotion transmission in the classroom: Exploring the relationship between teacher and student enjoyment. J. Ed. Psy. 101, 705–716 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Frederickson, B.L.: The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Amer. Psy. 56, 218–226 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lang, P.J.: The emotion probe: Studies of motivation and attention. Amer. Psy. 50, 372–385 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Martindale, C.: Cognition and Consciousness. Dorsey Press, Illinois (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pennebaker, J., Francis, M.E., Booth R.J.: Linguistic inquiry and word count (LIWC): LIWC2001, Mahwah, New Jersey (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rude, S.S., Gortner, E., Pennebaker, J.: Language use of depressed and depression- vulnerable college students. Cog. & Emot. 18, 1121–1133 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Graesser, A.C., Forsyth, C.: Discourse comprehension: oxford handbook of cognitive psychology. In: Reisberg, D. (ed.). Oxford University Press (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Graesser, A.C., Millis, K.K., Zwaan, R.A.: Discourse comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology 48, 163–189 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Graesser, A.C., McNamara, D.S.: Computational analyses of multilevel discourse comprehension. Top. Cog. Sci. (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17. Graesser, A.C., McNamara, D.S., Louwerse, M.M., Cai, Z.: Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohension and language. Beh. Res. Meth., Instru., and Comp. 36, 193–202 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Graesser, A.C., McNamara, D.S., Kulikowich, J.: Coh-Metrix: Providing multilevel analyses of text characteristics. Ed. Res. 40, 223–234 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Landauer, T., McNamara, D.S., Dennis, S., Kintsch, W.: Handbook of Latent Semantic Analysis, Mahwah, New Jersey (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jurafsky, D., Martin, J.: Speech and language processing. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cai, Z., Graesser, A.C., Forsyth, C., Burkett, C., Millis, K., Wallace, P., Halpern, D., Butler: Trialog in ARIES: user input assessment in an intelligent tutoring system. In: 3rd IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Intelligent Systems, pp. 429–433. IEEE Press, China (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jackson, G.T., Graesser, A.C., McNamara, D.S.: What students expect may have more impact than what they know or feel: artificial intelligence in education; building learning systems that care; from knowledge representation to affective modeling. In: Dimitrova, V., Mizoguchi, R., Du Boulay, B., Graesser, A.C. (eds.), pp. 73–80. IOS Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Forsyth, Carol, Graesser, Arthur, Walker, Breya, Millis, Keith, Pavlik Jr., Philip I., Halpern, Diane: Didactic galactic: types of knowledge learned in a serious game. In: Lane, HChad, Yacef, Kalina, Mostow, Jack, Pavlik, Philip (eds.) AIED 2013. LNCS, vol. 7926, pp. 832–835. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carol M. Forsyth .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Forsyth, C.M., Graesser, A., Olney, A.M., Millis, K., Walker, B., Cai, Z. (2015). Moody Agents: Affect and Discourse During Learning in a Serious Game. In: Conati, C., Heffernan, N., Mitrovic, A., Verdejo, M. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9112. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19772-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19773-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics