Skip to main content

Exploring Environmental Inequality Within US Communities Containing Coal and Nuclear Power Plants

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Hazardous Waste and Pollution

Abstract

This chapter seeks to unveil how the siting of nuclear power plants differs from the siting of coal-fired power plants in the USA. More specifically, it addresses how the demographics of surrounding communities differ according to the type of facility, and explores the possible causes of these discrepancies. Utilizing the US Environmental Protection Agency’s Emissions & Generation Resource Integrated Database (eGRID), the locations of all coal and nuclear powered plants in the country were identified. Census tracts were categorized as non-host, coal host, nuclear host, or both host tracts. Multinomial logistic regression was used to compare 2010 demographic census data among the different tract types. Discussion draws from environmental justice, green criminology, and risk perception literature to address the socio-structural implications of disparate demographics hosting coal- and nuclear-powered plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alldred, M., & Shrader-Frechette, K. (2009). Environmental injustice in siting nuclear plants. Environmental Justice, 2(2), 85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderton, D. L., Anderson, A. B., Oakes, M., & Fraser, M. R. (1994). Environmental equity: The demographics of dumping. Demography, 31(2), 229–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Newbury Park: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (2006). Living in the world risk society. A hobhouse memorial public lecture given on Wednesday 15 February 2006 at the London School of Economics. Economy and Society, 35(3), 329–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brugge, D., & Goble, R. (2002). The history of uranium mining and the Navajo people. American Journal of Public Health, 92(9), 1410–1419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brulle, R. J., & Pellow, D. N. (2006). Environmental justice: Human health and environmental inequalities. Annual Review of Public Health, 27(3), 103–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunekreef, B., & Holgate, S. (2002). Air pollution and health. Lancet, 360, 1233–1242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, B., & Mohai, P. (Eds.). (1992). Race and the Incidence of environmental hazards: A time for discourse. Boulder: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullard, R. D. (1990). Dumping in Dixie: Race, class, and environmental quality. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clapp, R. W., Cobb, S., Chan, C. K., & Walker, B. Jr. (1987). Leukemia near Massachusetts nuclear power plant. Lancet, 2, 1324–1325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dockery, D. W., Cunningham, J., Damokosh, A. I., Neas, L. M., Spengler, J. D., Koutrakis, P., Ware, J. H., Raizenne, M., & Speizer, F. E. (1996). Health effects of acid aerosols on North American children: Respiratory symptoms. Environmental Health Perspectives, 104(5), 500–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downey, L. (2005). The unintended significance of race: Environmental racial inequality in Detroit. Social Forces, 83(3), 971–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eiser, J. R., Van Der Pligt, J., & Spears, R. (1995). Nuclear neighbourhoods: Community responses to reactor siting. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Energy Action Coalition. (2012). The hub of the youth climate movement. http://www.energyactioncoalition.org/. Accessed 10 Sept 2012.

  • Energy Justice Network. (2012). Energy justice network. http://www.energyjustice.net/about. Accessed 10 Sept 2012.

  • Epstein, P. R., & Reinhart, N. (2010). Testimony for the Kentucky General Assembly, House of Representatives Committee on Health and Welfare. London, Ky: Kentuckians for the Commonwealth. http://www.kftc.org/blog/linkeddocuments/documents/Epsteinpercent20Testimony.doc. Accessed 12 Aug 2012.

  • Evans, S. (2010). Voices from the desecrated places: A Journey to end mountaintop removal mining. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 34, 521–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faber, D., & Krieg, E. (2002). Unequal exposure to ecological hazards: Environmental injustices in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Environmental Health Perspectives, 110(2), 277–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farber, S. (1998). Undesirable facilities and property values: A summary of empirical studies. Ecological Economics, 24(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galizia, A., & Kinney, P. (1999). Long-term residence in areas of high ozone: Associations with respiratory health in a nationwide sample of nonsmoking young adults. Environmental Health Perspectives, 107(8), 675–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerrard, M. (1994). Whose backyard, whose risk: Fear and fairness in toxic and nuclear waste siting. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, J. M. (1996). The enemy within: The high cost of living near nuclear reactors: Breast cancer, AIDS, Low birthweights, and other radiation-induced immune deficiency effects. New York: Four Walls Eight Windows.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grineski, S. E., Collins, T. W., Aquila, R., de Lourdes, M., & Aldouri, R. (2010). No safe place: Environmental hazards and injustices along Mexico’s northern border. Social Forces, 88(5), 2241–2266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gryparis, A., Forsberg, B., Katsouyanni, K., Analitis, A., Touloumi, G., Schwartz, J., Samoli, E., Medina, S., Anderson, H., Niciu, E., Wichmann, H., Kriz, B., Kosnik, M., Skorkovsky, J., Vonk, J., & Dortbudak, Z. (2004). Acute effects of ozone on mortality from the “Air Pollution and Health: A European Approach” project. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 170, 1080–1087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendryx, M. (2011). Poverty and mortality disparities in central Appalachia: Mountaintop mining and environmental justice. Journal of Health Disparities Research and Practice, 4(3), 50–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, B., & Keating, M. (2002). Children at risk: How air pollution from power plants threatens the health of America’s children. http://www.catf.us/resources/publications/view/14. Accessed 10 Aug 2012.

  • Hughes, J. (2006). Uranium mining and milling. The Ecologist, 36, 44–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung, H., & Wang, T. (2011). Determinants and mapping of collective perceptions of technological risk: The case of the second nuclear power plant in Taiwan. Risk Analysis, 31(4), 668–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibald- Mulli, A., Steiber, J., Wichmann, E., Koenig, W., & Peters, A. (2001). Effects of air pollution on blood pressure: A population-based approach. American Journal of Public Health, 91(4), 571–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Indigenous Environmental Network. (2012). Environmental justice. http://www.ienearth.org/energy.html. Accessed 15 Sept 2012.

  • Keating, M. (2004). Air of injustice: How air pollution affects the health of hispanics and latinos. http://lulac.org/assets/pdfs/pollutionreport2.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2012.

  • Keating, M., & Davis, F. (2002). Air of injustice: African Americans and power plant pollution. http://www.catf.us/resources/publications/view/20. Accessed 15 Aug 2012.

  • Long, M., Stretesky, P., Lynch, M., & Fenwick, E. (2012). Crime in the coal industry: Implications for green criminology and treadmill of production. Organization and Environment, 25(3), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malin, S. A., & Petrzelka, P. (2010). Left in the dust: Uranium’s legacy and victims of mill tailings exposure in Monticello, Utah. Society & Natural Resources, 23(12), 1187–1200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangano, J. J. (2002). Infant death and childhood cancer reductions after nuclear plant closings in the United States. Archives of Environmental Health, 57(1), 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangano, J. J. (2008). Excess infant mortality after nuclear plant startup in rural Mississippi. International Journal of Health Services, 38(2), 277–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, H. (1996). Dealing with risk: Why the public and the experts disagree on environmental issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markstrom, C. A., & Charley, P. H. (2003). Psychological effects of technological/human caused environmental disasters: Examination of the navajo and uranium. American Indian & Alaska Native Mental Health Research: The Journal of the National Center, 11(1), 19–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGinley, P. C. (2004). From pick and shovel to mountaintop removal: Environmental injustice in the Appalachian coalfields. Environmental Law, 34(1), 81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohai, P., & Bryant, B. (1992). Race, poverty, and the environment. EPA Journal, 1, 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohai, P., & Saha, R. (2006). Reassessing racial and socioeconomic disparities in environmental justice research. Demography, 43(2), 383–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences. (2005). Report in Brief BEIR VII: Health Effects from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation. http://dels-old.nas.edu/dels/rpt_briefs/beir_vii_final.pdf. Accessed 2 April 2012.

  • Nuclear Energy Agency. (2002). Nuclear energy agency. https://www.oecd-nea.org/. Accessed 15 Nov 2012.

  • Nuclear Energy Institute. (2012). Nuclear waste disposal. http://www.nei.org/resourcesandstats/documentlibrary/nuclearwastedisposal/factsheet/safelymanagingusednuclearfuel/. Accessed 21 Nov 2012.

  • Ochs Center for Metropolitan Studies. (2009). An analysis of the economic impacts and financing of the proposed coal‐fired power plant in early county: An economic brief by the ochs center for metropolitan studies. http://www.ochscenter.org/documents/EarlyCountyReport3909.pdf. Accessed 14 April 2012.

  • Pellow, D. N. (2000). Environmental inequality formation: Toward a theory of environmental injustice. The American Behavioral Scientist, 43(4), 581–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perlin, S. A., Wong, D., & Sexton, K. (2001). Residential proximity to industrial sources of air pollution: Interrelationships among race, poverty, and age. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 51(3), 406–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilotto, L., Douglas, R., Attewell, R., & Wilson, S. (1997). Respiratory effects associated with indoor nitrogen dioxide exposure in children. International Journal of Epidemiology, 26(4), 788–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samoli, E., Aga, E., Touloumi, G., Nisiotis, K., Forsberg, B., Lefranc, A., Pekkanen, J., Wojtyniak, B., Schindler, C., Niciu, E., Brunstein, R., Dodic Fikfak, M., Schwartz, J., & Katsouyanni, K. (2006). Short-term effects of nitrogen dioxide on mortality: An analysis with the APHEA project. European Respiratory Journal, 27(6), 1129–1138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnaiberg, A. (1980). The environment: From surplus to scarcity. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnaiberg, A., Pellow, D., & Weinberg, A. (2002). The treadmill of production and the environmental state. In A. P. J. Mol & F. H. Buttel (Eds.), The environmental state under pressure (pp. 15–32). London: Elsevier/JAI.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, C., & Banks, J. (2010). The toll from coal: An updated assessment of death and disease from America’s dirtiest energy source. Clean Air Task Force. http://www.catf.us/resources/publications/files/The_Toll_from_Coal.pdf. Accessed 5 Sept 2012.

  • Sjoberg, L. (2003). Attitudes and risk perceptions of stakeholders in a nuclear waste siting issue. Risk Analysis, 23(4), 739–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, J. (2001). Risk Perception Mapping and the Fermi II nuclear power plant: Toward an ethnography of social access to public participation in great lakes environmental management. Environment Science & Policy, 4(4), 205–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stretesky, P. B., Long, M. A., & Lynch, M. J. (2013). Treadmill of crime: Political economy and green criminology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunyer, J., Ballester, F., Le Terte, A., Atkinson, R., Ayers, J., Forastiere, F., Forsberg, B., Vonk, J., Bisanti, L., Tenias, J., Medina, S., Schwartz, J., & Katsouyanni, K. (2003). The association of daily sulfur dioxide air pollution levels with hospital admissions for cardiovascular diseases in Europe (The Aphea-II study). European Heart Journal, 24(8), 752–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swings, P. O., Bowie, C., Philipps, M. J., & Johnson, S. A. N. (1989). Incidence of leukemia in young people in the vicinity of Hinkley Point nuclear power station. BMJ (Clinical research ed. ), 299, 289–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taliman, V. (1992). Stuck Holding the Nation’s Nuclear Waste. Race, Poverty & Environment Newsletter, 3(3), 6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. M., & Taylor, S. K. (1997). Environmental uranium and human health. Review of Environmental Health, 12(3), 147–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Census Bureau. (2010). Census tiger/line shapefiles. http://www.census.gov/geo/www/tiger/tgrshp2010/tgrshp2010.html. Accessed 1 April 2012.

  • United States Energy Information Administration. (2012a). Electricity. http://www.eia.gov/electricity/. Accessed 5 Sept 2012.

  • United States Energy Information Administration. (2012b). Impacts of coal mining. http://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/index.cfm?page=coalenvironment. Accessed 1 Sept 2012.

  • United States Energy Information Administration. (2012c). What is the role of coal in the United States? http://www.eia.gov/energy_in_brief/role_coal_us.cfm. Accessed 3 March 2012.

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2012a). Greenhouse gas emissions. http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/gases/.html. Accessed 5 Aug 2012.

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2012b). http://www.epa.gov/. Accessed 8 Aug 2012.

  • Venables, D., Pidgeon, N., Simmons, P., Henwood, K., & Parkhill, K. (2009). Living with Nuclear Power: A Q-Method Study of Local Community Perceptions. Risk Analysis, 29(8), 1089–1104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Nuclear Association. (2012). Nuclear power economics and project structuring. http://www.worldnuclear.org/uploadedFiles/org/WNA/Publications/Working_Group_Reports/REPORT_Economics_Report%20(1).pdf. Accessed 7 March 2013.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael A. Long .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kosmicki, S., Long, M. (2016). Exploring Environmental Inequality Within US Communities Containing Coal and Nuclear Power Plants. In: Wyatt, T. (eds) Hazardous Waste and Pollution. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18081-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18081-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18080-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18081-6

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics