Abstract
The increasing volatility of their companies’ environment is a growing concern for executives. Environmental scanning systems should enable them to focus earlier on emerging threats and opportunities. A lack of applicability means that concepts often go unused in practice. But what does applicability mean for environmental scanning systems design? Adhering to the design science paradigm, this article contributes to better information systems (IS) design by developing a systematic list approach to requirements criteria that specify the applicability of environmental scanning systems. The criteria are derived from the principle of economic efficiency, use findings from the absorptive capacity theory, and can be applied to both evaluate existing environmental scanning systems and develop a new, more applicable generation. The findings should also be applicable to other IS domains.
An extended version of this article has been published as: Bischoff S, Weitzel T, Mayer JH (2012) Requirements criteria for applicable environmental scanning systems: model development and first demonstration. In: Mattfeld D, Robra-Bissantz S (eds) Proceedings der Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2012, Braunschweig, 29.02.2012. GITO, Berlin, pp 945–957.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aguilar FJ (1967) Scanning the business environment. Macmillan, New York
Ansoff HI (1975) Managing strategic surprise by response to weak signals. Calif Manag Rev 18(2):21–33
Bischoff S, Weitzel T, Mayer JH (2012) Requirements criteria for applicable environmental scanning systems: model development and first demonstration. In: Mattfeld DC, Robra-Bissantz S (eds) Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2012 (MKWI 2012), Proceedings der Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2012. GITO Verlag, Braunschweig, pp 945–957
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) (2004) Enterprise risk management—integrated framework. COSO, New York
Davies J, Finlay M, McLenaghen T, Wilson D (2006) Key risk indicators—their role in operational risk management and measurement. In: Davis E (ed) The advanced measurement approach to operational risk. Risk Books, London, pp 215–246
Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3):318–340
DeLone WH, McLean ER (2003) The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J Manag Inform Syst 19(4):9–30
Duncan RB (1972) Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Admin Sci Q 17(3):313–327
Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA (2000) Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strat Manag J 21(10–11):1105–1121
Elofson G, Konsynski B (1991) Delegation technologies: environmental scanning with intelligent agents. J Manag Inform Syst 8(1):37–62
Frolick MN, Parzinger MJ, Rainer RKJ, Ramarapu N (1997) Using EISs for environmental scanning. Inform Syst Manag 14(1):35–40
Fuld L (2003) Be prepared. Harv Bus Rev 81(11):20–21
Gulati R, Nohria N, Zaheer A (2000) Strategic networks. Strat Manag J 21(3):203–215
Hevner AR, Chatterjee S (2010) Design research in information systems: theory and practice, vol 22, Integrated series in information systems. Springer, Berlin
IEEE (1998) IEEE recommended practice for software requirements specifications. Institute of Electrical & Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Computer Society, New York
Jansen JJP, Van Den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW (2005) Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: how do organizational antecedents matter? Acad Manag Rev 48(6):999–1015
Jiang JJ, Muhanna WA, Klein G (2000) User resistance and strategies for promoting acceptance across system types. Inform Manag 37:25–36
Lenz RT, Engledow JL (1986) The applicability of current theory. Strat Manag J 7(4):329–346
Lipschitz R, Klein G, Orasanu J, Salas E (2001) Taking stock of naturalistic decision making. J Behav Decis Making 14:331–352
Makridakis S, Hogarth RM, Gaba A (2010) Why forecasts fail. What to do instead. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 51(2):83–90
March ST, Hevner AR (2007) Integrated decision support systems: a data warehousing perspective. Decis Support Syst 43(3):1031–1043
Matek W, Muhs D, Wittel H (1987) Maschinenelemente—Normung—Berechnung—Gestaltung. Vieweg, Braunschweig
Mayer JH, Marx F (2010) Systematic development of business-driven requirements—using next-generation EIS design as an example. In: Winter R, Zhao J, Aier S (eds) Fifth international conference on design science research in information systems and technology (DESRIST), St. Gallen, 4 June 2010. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 506–521
Mayer JH, Steinecke N (2011) Quick R improving the applicability of environmental scanning systems: state of the art and future research. In: Kautz K, Gadatsch A, Nüttgens M (eds) IFIP WG 8.6 working conference, Hamburg, 22–24 Sept 2011. Springer
Niu L, Lu J, Zhang G (2008) Cognitive orientation in business intelligence systems. Stud Comput Intell 117:55–72
Oh L-B (2009) Managing external information sources in digital extended enterprises: the role of IT enabled business intelligence competence and network structure strength. In: 30th international conference on information systems (ICIS), Phoenix, AZ, USA, pp 1–13
Popper KR (1982) Logik der Forschung, 7th edn. Mohr, Tübingen
Samuelson PA (1983) Foundations of economic analysis, Enlarged edition. Harvard University Press, Harvard, MA
Stair RM, Reynolds GW (2011) Principles of information systems, 10th edn. Course Technology, Boston, MA
Sutcliffe KM, Weber K (2003) The high cost of accurate knowledge. Harv Bus Rev 81(5):74–82
Teece DJ (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strat Manag J 28(8):1319–1350
Urbach N, Smolnik S, Riempp G (2009) The state of research on information systems success—a review of existing multidimensional approaches. Bus Inform Syst Eng 51(4):315–325
Volberda HW, Foss NJ, Lyles MA (2010) Absorbing the concept of absorptive capacity: how to realize its potential in the organizational field. Organ Sci 21(4):931–951
Warmouth MT, Yen D (1992) A detailed analysis of executive information systems. Int J Inform Manag 12(2):192–208
Zahra SA, George G (2002) Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad Manag Rev 27(2):185–203
Zott C (2003) Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intra-industry differential firm performance: insights from a simulation study. Strat Manag J 24(1):97–125
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bischoff, S., Mayer, J.H., Weitzel, T., Quick, R. (2015). Applicability of Environmental Scanning Systems: A Systematic List Approach to Requirements Criteria. In: Mayer, J., Quick, R. (eds) Business Intelligence for New-Generation Managers. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15696-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15696-5_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15695-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15696-5
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)