Skip to main content

Can Diversity Improve Credibility of User Review Data?

  • Chapter
Social Informatics (SocInfo 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8851))

Included in the following conference series:

  • International Conference on Social Informatics

Abstract

In this paper, we propose methods to estimate the credibility of reviewers as an individual and as a group, where the credibility is defined as the ability of precisely estimating the quality of items. Our proposed methods are built on two simple assumptions: 1) a reviewer who has reviewed many and diverse items has high credibility, and 2) a group of reviewers is credible if the group consists of many and diverse reviewers. To verify the two assumptions, we conducted experiments with a movie review dataset. The experimental results showed that the diversity of reviewed items and reviewers was effective to estimate the credibility of reviewers and reviewer groups, respectively. Therefore, yes, the diversity does improve the credibility of user review data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agrawal, R., Gollapudi, S., Halverson, A., Ieong, S.: Diversifying search results. In: Proceedings of the Second ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM 2009, pp. 5–14. ACM, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amatriain, X., Lathia, N., Pujol, J.M., Kwak, H., Oliver, N.: The wisdom of the few: A collaborative filtering approach based on expert opinions from the web. In: Proceedings of the 32nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2009, pp. 532–539. ACM, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Capannini, G., Nardini, F.M., Perego, R., Silvestri, F.: Efficient diversification of web search results. Proc. VLDB Endow. 4(7), 451–459 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carbonell, J., Goldstein, J.: The use of mmr, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 1998, pp. 335–336. ACM, New York (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu, X., Croft, W.B., Koll, M.: Finding experts in community-based question-answering services. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM 2005, pp. 315–316 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Magurran, A.E.: Measuring biological diversity. African Journal of Aquatic Science 29(2), 285–286 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McAuley, J.J., Leskovec, J.: From amateurs to connoisseurs: Modeling the evolution of user expertise through online reviews. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2013, pp. 897–908. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Nolan, K.A., Callahan, J.E.: Beachcomber biology: The shannon-weiner species diversity index. In: Proc. Workshop ABLE, vol. 27, pp. 334–338 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sha, X., Quercia, D., Michiardi, P., Dell’Amico, M.: Spotting trends: The wisdom of the few. In: Proceedings of the Sixth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, RecSys 2012, pp. 51–58. ACM, New York (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Shoji, Y., Tanaka, K.: Diversity-based HITS: Web page ranking by referrer and referral diversity. In: Jatowt, A., Lim, E.-P., Ding, Y., Miura, A., Tezuka, T., Dias, G., Tanaka, K., Flanagin, A., Dai, B.T. (eds.) SocInfo 2013. LNCS, vol. 8238, pp. 377–390. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Stirling, A.: A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 4(15), 707–719 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Surowiecki, J.: The wisdom of crowds. Anchor (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, J., Zhu, J.: Portfolio theory of information retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2009, pp. 115–122. ACM, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shoji, Y., Kato, M.P., Tanaka, K. (2014). Can Diversity Improve Credibility of User Review Data?. In: Aiello, L.M., McFarland, D. (eds) Social Informatics. SocInfo 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8851. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13734-6_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13734-6_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13733-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13734-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics