Skip to main content

Towards an XBRL Ontology Extension for Management Accounting

  • Conference paper
Conceptual Modeling (ER 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8824))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2128 Accesses

Abstract

The Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) is used in several countries to share business data and it is largely diffused, for example, for balance sheets exchange and archival. On the other side, the analysis of management accounting data poses more interoperability issues. In particular, it requires more sophisticate information models in order to integrate data generated by different parties (both internal and external to the enterprise) in different formats and for different purposes. For the same reason, the “flat” mapping, performed by automatic mechanisms often used to import XBRL streams into Web Ontology Language (OWL) for further processing, is inadequate and more sophisticate options are required. In this perspective, we propose a modification and extension of an existing XBRL ontology, with the aim of better supporting the concepts and the operations needed for management accounting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bititci, U., et al.: Performance Measurement: Challenges for Tomorrow. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 14, 305–327 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. García, R., Gil, R.: Facilitating Business Interoperability from the Semantic Web State of the Art

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lara, R., Cantador, I., Castells, P.: XBRL taxonomies and OWL ontologies for investment funds. In: Roddick, J., et al. (eds.) ER Workshops 2006. LNCS, vol. 4231, pp. 271–280. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Schreiber, G., et al.: The CommonKADS Conceptual Modelling Language. A Futur. Knowl. Acquis. 867, 1–25 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Grüninger, M.U., Ontologies, M.: principles, methods, and applications. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 11, 93–155 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. BizOntos - Business Ontologies, http://rhizomik.net/html/ontologies/bizontos/

  7. Hitzler, P., et al.: M.K.: OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Primer, 2nd edn. (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guan, J., et al.: How AIS can progress along with ontology research in IS. Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst. 14, 21–38 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Erdmann, M., Studer, R.: How to Structure and Access XML Documents With Ontologies. Data Knowl. Eng. 36, 317–335 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Fisher, I.E.: On the structure of financial accounting standards to support digital representation, storage, and retrieval. J. Emerg. Technol. Account. 1, 23–40 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pulido, J.R.G., et al.: Ontology languages for the semantic web: A never completely updated review. Knowledge-Based Syst. 19, 489–497 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bao, J., Rong, G., Li, X., Ding, L.: Representing financial reports on the semantic web: In: Dean, M., Hall, J., Rotolo, A., Tabet, S. (eds.) RuleML 2010. LNCS, vol. 6403, pp. 144–152. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Spies, M.: An ontology modelling perspective on business reporting. Inf. Syst. 35, 404–416 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chou, T.-H., et al.: Knowledge management via ontology development in accounting. Kybernetes 37, 36–48 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Hevner, A.R.: A Three Cycle View of Design Science Research. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 19 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Grüninger, M., Fox, M.S.: Methodology for the Design and Evaluation of Ontologies (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Uschold, M., et al.: The enterprise ontology. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 13, 31–89 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. van Heijst, G., et al.: Using Explicit Ontologies for KBS Development. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 46, 183–292 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Breuker, J., et al.: Developing Content for LKIF: Ontologies and Frameworks for Legal Reasoning. In: JURIX 2006 19th Annu. Conf., vol. 152 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pedrinaci, C., Domingue, J., Alves de Medeiros, A.K.: A Core Ontology for Business Process Analysis. In: Bechhofer, S., Hauswirth, M., Hoffmann, J., Koubarakis, M. (eds.) ESWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5021, pp. 49–64. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Time Ontology, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/

  22. XBRL Instance Ontology, http://rhizomik.net/ontologies/2007/11/xbrl-instance-2003-12-31.owl

  23. Protégé Ontology (ed.), http://protege.stanford.edu

  24. Sirin, E., et al.: Pellet: A Practical OWL-DL Reasoner. Web Semant. Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web. Softw. Eng. Semant. Web. 5, 51–53 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Presutti, V., et al.: eXtreme design with content ontology design patterns. In: Proc. Workshop on Ontology Patterns, Washington, DC, USA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  26. SPARQL 1.1 Query Language. W3C Recommendation, http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Livieri, B., Zappatore, M., Bochicchio, M. (2014). Towards an XBRL Ontology Extension for Management Accounting. In: Yu, E., Dobbie, G., Jarke, M., Purao, S. (eds) Conceptual Modeling. ER 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8824. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12206-9_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12206-9_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12205-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12206-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics