Skip to main content

eFis: A Fuzzy Inference Method for Predicting Malignancy of Small Pulmonary Nodules

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Image Analysis and Recognition (ICIAR 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 8815))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Predicting malignancy of small pulmonary nodules from computer tomography scans is a difficult and important problem to diagnose lung cancer. This paper presents a rule based fuzzy inference method for predicting malignancy rating of small pulmonary nodules. We use the nodule characteristics provided by Lung Image Database Consortium dataset to determine malignancy rating. The proposed fuzzy inference method uses outputs of ensemble classifiers and rules from radiologist agreements on the nodules. The results are evaluated over classification accuracy performance and compared with single classifier methods. We observed that the preliminary results are very promising and system is open to development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Austin, J.H., et al.: Glossary of terms for CT of the lungs: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the Fleischner Society. Radiology 200 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Armato, S.G., et al.: Lung image database consortium: Developing a resource for the medical imaging research community. Radiology 232, 739–748 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Xu, D.M., et al.: Limited value of shape, margin and CT density in the discrimination between benign and malignant screen detected solid pulmonary nodules of the NELSON trial. European Journal of Radiology 68(2), 347–352 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li, Q., Li, F., Shiraishi, J., Katsuragawa, S., Sone, S., Doi, K.: Investigation of new psychophysical measures for evaluation of similar images on thoracic computed tomography for distinction between benign and malignant nodules. Medical Physics 30(10), 2584–2593 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Horsthemke, W.H., et al.: Predicting LIDC diagnostic characteristics by combining spatial and diagnostic opinions. In: SPIE Medical Imaging. International Society for Optics and Photonics (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Giuca, A.M., Seitz, K.A., Furst, J., Raicu, D.: Expanding diagnostically labeled datasets using content-based image retrieval. In: 2012 19th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 2397–2400. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zinovev, D., Raicu, D., Furst, J., Armato, S.G.: Predicting radiological panel opinions using a panel of machine learning classifiers. Algorithms 2(4), 1473–1502 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li, G., et al.: Semantic characteristics prediction of pulmonary nodule using Artificial Neural Networks. In: 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dasovich, G.M., Kim, R., Raicu, D.S., Furst, J.D.: A model for the relationship between semantic and content based similarity using LIDC. In: SPIE Medical Imaging, pp. 762431–762431. International Society for Optics and Photonics (March 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zinovev, D., Furst, J., Raicu, D.: Building an Ensemble of Probabilistic Classifiers for Lung Nodule Interpretation. In: 10th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications and Workshops (ICMLA), vol. 2, pp. 155–161. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sun, Y., Li, J.: Iterative RELIEF for feature weighting. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 913–920. ACM (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cortes, C., Vapnik, V.: Support-vector networks. Machine Learning 20(3), 273–297 (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Chawla, N.V., Bowyer, K.W., Hall, L.O., Kegelmeyer, W.P.: SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. arXiv preprint arXiv:1106.1813 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Troyanskaya, O., et al.: Missing value estimation methods for DNA microarrays. Bioinformatics 17(6), 520–525 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kodell, R.L., Zhang, C., Siegel, E.R., Nagarajan, R.: Selective voting in convex-hull ensembles improves classification accuracy. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 54(3), 171–179 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nalbantov, G.I., Groenen, P.J., Bioch, J.C.: Nearest convex hull classification (No. EI 2006-50). Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. The Cancer Imaging Archive Wiki Site: https://wiki.cancerimagingarchive.net/display/Public/Wiki (last access: December 20, 2013)

  18. Barber, C.B., Dobkin, D.P., Huhdanpaa, H.: The quickhull algorithm for convex hulls. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS) 22(4), 469–483 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aydın Kaya .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kaya, A., Can, A.B. (2014). eFis: A Fuzzy Inference Method for Predicting Malignancy of Small Pulmonary Nodules. In: Campilho, A., Kamel, M. (eds) Image Analysis and Recognition. ICIAR 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8815. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11755-3_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11755-3_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11754-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11755-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics