Skip to main content

Experts and Machines against Bullies: A Hybrid Approach to Detect Cyberbullies

  • Conference paper
Advances in Artificial Intelligence (Canadian AI 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8436))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Cyberbullying is becoming a major concern in online environments with troubling consequences. However, most of the technical studies have focused on the detection of cyberbullying through identifying harassing comments rather than preventing the incidents by detecting the bullies. In this work we study the automatic detection of bully users on YouTube. We compare three types of automatic detection: an expert system, supervised machine learning models, and a hybrid type combining the two. All these systems assign a score indicating the level of “bulliness” of online bullies. We demonstrate that the expert system outperforms the machine learning models. The hybrid classifier shows an even better performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Smith, P.K., et al.: Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 49(4), 376–385 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Perren, S., et al.: Coping with Cyberbullying:ASystematic Literature Review. Final Report of the ‘COST’IS 0801’ (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Campbell, M.A.: Cyber bullying: An old problem in a new guise? Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling 15(1), 68–76 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dinakar, K., Reichart, R., Lieberman, H.: Modeling the Detection of Textual Cyberbullying. In: Social Mobile Web Workshop at International Conference on Weblog and Social Media (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yin, D., et al.: Detection of harassment on Web 2.0. In: Proceedings of the Content Analysis in the WEB 2.0 (CAW2.0) Workshop at WWW 2009, Madrid, Spain (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dadvar, M., Trieschnigg, D., Ordelman, R., de Jong, F.: Improving cyberbullying detection with user context. In: Serdyukov, P., Braslavski, P., Kuznetsov, S.O., Kamps, J., Rüger, S., Agichtein, E., Segalovich, I., Yilmaz, E. (eds.) ECIR 2013. LNCS, vol. 7814, pp. 693–696. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Argamon, S., et al.: Mining the Blogosphere: Age, gender and the varieties of self-expression. First Monday 12(9) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pazienza, M.T., Tudorache, A.G.: Interdisciplinary contributions to flame modeling. In: Pirrone, R., Sorbello, F. (eds.) AI*IA 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6934, pp. 213–224. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Dadvar, M., De Jong, F., Trieschnigg, D.: Expert knowledge for automatic detection of bullies in social networks. In: The 25th Benelux Conference on Artificial Intelligence (BNAIC 2013), Delft (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cha, M., et al.: I tube, you tube, everybody tubes: Analyzing the world’s largest user generated content video system. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement. ACM (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M.: Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys, vol. 78. Springer (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Farah, M., Vanderpooten, D.: A multiple criteria approach for information retrieval. In: Crestani, F., Ferragina, P., Sanderson, M. (eds.) SPIRE 2006. LNCS, vol. 4209, pp. 242–254. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu, Z., Khoshgoftaar, T.M., Allen, E.B.: Application of fuzzy expert systems in assessing operational risk of software. Information and Software Technology 45(7), 373–388 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Witten, I.H., Frank, E., Hall, M.A.: Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. Elsevier (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hall, M., et al.: The WEKA data mining software: An update. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 11(1), 10–18 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fielding, A.H., Bell, J.F.: A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environmental Conservation 24(1), 38–49 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dadvar, M., Trieschnigg, D., de Jong, F. (2014). Experts and Machines against Bullies: A Hybrid Approach to Detect Cyberbullies. In: Sokolova, M., van Beek, P. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Canadian AI 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8436. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06483-3_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06483-3_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06482-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06483-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics