Abstract
“Energy” is a complex scientific concept central to all scientific disciplines. Here we describe three perspectives often used to address energy in the context of introductory college level courses: the macroscopic, which involves thermodynamic and mathematical treatments of energy and energy changes, the atomic-molecular, which relates to energy changes that result from bonding and intermolecular interactions, and the quantum-mechanical, which relates to energy quantization and provides the basis for understanding periodic trends, molecular structure, and electromagnetic radiation. A robust understanding of the role of energy within chemical systems requires that these three perspectives be integrated, but often they are separated into distinct sections of the course and are not explicitly connected. Moreover, prior instruction that does not explicitly address energy concepts at the molecular level almost certainly adds to student challenges. We suggest an alternate approach, illustrated by the new general chemistry course “Chemistry, Life, the Universe and Everything”, in which structure, properties and energy are presented as three interconnected learning progressions, and the treatment of energy is integrated. All three energy perspectives are explicitly addressed and related to each other in increasingly more sophisticated ways, so that students are led from the structure of the atom through to networked biological reactions, and the role that energy, entropy and Gibbs energy play in these systems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Selected course materials for the course available online at http://besocratic.colorado.edu/CLUE-Chemistry/index.html
- 2.
References
Achieve. (2013). Next generation science standards. Washington, DC: National Research Council. Retrieved from: http://nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards
Barker, V., & Millar, R. (2000). Student’s reasoning about basic chemical thermodynamics and chemical bonding: What changes occur during a context-based post-16 chemistry course? International Journal of Science Education, 22, 1171–1200.
Boo, H. K. (1998). Students’ understandings of chemical bonds and the energetics of chemical reactions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 569–581.
Carson, J., & Watson, E. M. (2002). Undergraduate students’ understandings of entropy and Gibbs free energy. University Chemistry Education, 4, 4–12.
Chang, R., & Goldsby, K. (2012). Chemistry (11th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Cooper, M. M., Underwood, S. M., Hilley, C. Z., & Klymkowsky, M. W. (2012). Development and assessment of a molecular structure and properties learning progression. Journal of Chemical Education, 89, 1351–1357.
Hadfield, L. C., & Wieman, C. E. (2010). Student interpretations of equations related to the first law of thermodynamics. Journal of Chemical Education, 87, 750–755.
Jewett, J. W. (2008). Energy and the confused student III: Language. The Physics Teacher, 46, 149–153.
Jin, H., & Anderson, C. W. (2012). A learning progression for energy in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 1149–1180.
Kaper, W., & Goedhart, M. (2002). ‘Forms of energy’, an intermediary language on the road to thermodynamics? Part I. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 81–95.
Lambert, F. L. (2002). Disorder – A cracked crutch for supporting entropy discussions. Journal of Chemical Education, 79, 187–192.
Lancor, R. A. (2012). Using student-generated analogies to investigate conceptions of energy: A multidisciplinary study. International Journal of Science Education, 36, 1–23.
Nahum, T. L., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., & Krajcik, J. (2007). Developing a new teaching approach for the chemical bonding concept aligned with current scientific and pedagogical knowledge. Science Education, 91, 579–603.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas (Q. Helen, S. Heidi, & K. Thomas, Eds.). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Park, E. J., & Light, G. (2009). Identifying atomic structure as a threshold concept: Student mental models and troublesomeness. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 233–258.
Sozbilir, M. (2002). Turkish chemistry undergraduate students’ misunderstandings of Gibbs free energy. University Chemistry Education, 6, 73–82.
Taber, K. S. (1998). An alternative conceptual framework from chemistry education. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 597–608.
Taber, K. S. (2002). Conceptualizing quanta: Illuminating the ground state of student understanding of atomic orbitals. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 3, 145–158.
Taber, K. S. (2004). Learning quanta: Barriers to stimulating transitions in student understanding of orbital ideas. Science Education, 3, 94–116.
Taber, K. S. (2013). Revisiting the chemistry triplet: Drawing upon the nature of chemical knowledge and psychology of learning to inform chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14, 156–168.
Thomas, P. L., & Schwenz, R. W. (1998). College physical chemistry students’ conceptions of equilibrium and fundamental thermodynamics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 1151–1191.
Tsaparlis, G., & Papaphotis, G. (2009). High-school students’ conceptual difficulties and attempts at conceptual change: The case of basic quantum chemical concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 895–930.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cooper, M.M., Klymkowsky, M.W., Becker, N.M. (2014). Energy in Chemical Systems: An Integrated Approach. In: Chen, R., et al. Teaching and Learning of Energy in K – 12 Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05017-1_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05017-1_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05016-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05017-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)