Skip to main content

Energy in Chemical Systems: An Integrated Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Teaching and Learning of Energy in K – 12 Education

Abstract

“Energy” is a complex scientific concept central to all scientific disciplines. Here we describe three perspectives often used to address energy in the context of introductory college level courses: the macroscopic, which involves thermodynamic and mathematical treatments of energy and energy changes, the atomic-molecular, which relates to energy changes that result from bonding and intermolecular interactions, and the quantum-mechanical, which relates to energy quantization and provides the basis for understanding periodic trends, molecular structure, and electromagnetic radiation. A robust understanding of the role of energy within chemical systems requires that these three perspectives be integrated, but often they are separated into distinct sections of the course and are not explicitly connected. Moreover, prior instruction that does not explicitly address energy concepts at the molecular level almost certainly adds to student challenges. We suggest an alternate approach, illustrated by the new general chemistry course “Chemistry, Life, the Universe and Everything”, in which structure, properties and energy are presented as three interconnected learning progressions, and the treatment of energy is integrated. All three energy perspectives are explicitly addressed and related to each other in increasingly more sophisticated ways, so that students are led from the structure of the atom through to networked biological reactions, and the role that energy, entropy and Gibbs energy play in these systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Selected course materials for the course available online at http://besocratic.colorado.edu/CLUE-Chemistry/index.html

  2. 2.

    Available online at http://besocratic.colorado.edu/CLUE-Chemistry/activities/LondonDispersionForce/1.2-interactions-1.html

References

  • Achieve. (2013). Next generation science standards. Washington, DC: National Research Council. Retrieved from: http://nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards

  • Barker, V., & Millar, R. (2000). Student’s reasoning about basic chemical thermodynamics and chemical bonding: What changes occur during a context-based post-16 chemistry course? International Journal of Science Education, 22, 1171–1200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boo, H. K. (1998). Students’ understandings of chemical bonds and the energetics of chemical reactions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 569–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, J., & Watson, E. M. (2002). Undergraduate students’ understandings of entropy and Gibbs free energy. University Chemistry Education, 4, 4–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, R., & Goldsby, K. (2012). Chemistry (11th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M. M., Underwood, S. M., Hilley, C. Z., & Klymkowsky, M. W. (2012). Development and assessment of a molecular structure and properties learning progression. Journal of Chemical Education, 89, 1351–1357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadfield, L. C., & Wieman, C. E. (2010). Student interpretations of equations related to the first law of thermodynamics. Journal of Chemical Education, 87, 750–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jewett, J. W. (2008). Energy and the confused student III: Language. The Physics Teacher, 46, 149–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, H., & Anderson, C. W. (2012). A learning progression for energy in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 1149–1180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaper, W., & Goedhart, M. (2002). ‘Forms of energy’, an intermediary language on the road to thermodynamics? Part I. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, F. L. (2002). Disorder – A cracked crutch for supporting entropy discussions. Journal of Chemical Education, 79, 187–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancor, R. A. (2012). Using student-generated analogies to investigate conceptions of energy: A multidisciplinary study. International Journal of Science Education, 36, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahum, T. L., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., & Krajcik, J. (2007). Developing a new teaching approach for the chemical bonding concept aligned with current scientific and pedagogical knowledge. Science Education, 91, 579–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas (Q. Helen, S. Heidi, & K. Thomas, Eds.). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, E. J., & Light, G. (2009). Identifying atomic structure as a threshold concept: Student mental models and troublesomeness. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 233–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sozbilir, M. (2002). Turkish chemistry undergraduate students’ misunderstandings of Gibbs free energy. University Chemistry Education, 6, 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K. S. (1998). An alternative conceptual framework from chemistry education. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 597–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K. S. (2002). Conceptualizing quanta: Illuminating the ground state of student understanding of atomic orbitals. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 3, 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K. S. (2004). Learning quanta: Barriers to stimulating transitions in student understanding of orbital ideas. Science Education, 3, 94–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K. S. (2013). Revisiting the chemistry triplet: Drawing upon the nature of chemical knowledge and psychology of learning to inform chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14, 156–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, P. L., & Schwenz, R. W. (1998). College physical chemistry students’ conceptions of equilibrium and fundamental thermodynamics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 1151–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsaparlis, G., & Papaphotis, G. (2009). High-school students’ conceptual difficulties and attempts at conceptual change: The case of basic quantum chemical concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 895–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melanie M. Cooper .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cooper, M.M., Klymkowsky, M.W., Becker, N.M. (2014). Energy in Chemical Systems: An Integrated Approach. In: Chen, R., et al. Teaching and Learning of Energy in K – 12 Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05017-1_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics